Cargando…

Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials to increase retention rate at follow-ups, and to explore the feasibility of doing a study within a trial (SWAT) across multiple host trials simultaneously. DESIGN: Randomised SWAT co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coleman, Elizabeth, Arundel, Catherine, Clark, Laura, Doherty, Laura, Gillies, Katie, Hewitt, Catherine, Innes, Karen, Parker, Adwoa, Torgerson, David, Treweek, Shaun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067742
_version_ 1784614806558343168
author Coleman, Elizabeth
Arundel, Catherine
Clark, Laura
Doherty, Laura
Gillies, Katie
Hewitt, Catherine
Innes, Karen
Parker, Adwoa
Torgerson, David
Treweek, Shaun
author_facet Coleman, Elizabeth
Arundel, Catherine
Clark, Laura
Doherty, Laura
Gillies, Katie
Hewitt, Catherine
Innes, Karen
Parker, Adwoa
Torgerson, David
Treweek, Shaun
author_sort Coleman, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials to increase retention rate at follow-ups, and to explore the feasibility of doing a study within a trial (SWAT) across multiple host trials simultaneously. DESIGN: Randomised SWAT conducted simultaneously across eight host trials. SETTING: Eight randomised controlled trials researching various areas including surgery and smoking cessation. PARTICIPANTS: 3223 trial participants who were still due at least one follow-up from their host randomised controlled trial. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised (1:1, separately by each host trial) to either received a Christmas card in mid-December 2019 or to not receive a card. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of participants completing their next follow-up (retention rate) within their host randomised controlled trial. RESULTS: 1469 participants (age 16-94 years; 70% (n=1033) female; 96% (813/847) white ethnicity) across the eight host randomised controlled trials were involved in the analysis (cut short owing to covid-19). No evidence was found of a difference in retention rate between the two arms for any of the host trials when analysed separately or when the results were combined (85.3% (639/749) for cards versus 85.4% (615/720) for no card; odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.29; P=0.77). No difference was observed when comparing just participants who were due a follow-up in the 30 days after receiving the card (odds ratio 0.96, 0.42 to 2.21). No evidence of a difference in time to complete the questionnaire was found (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.13; P=0.80). These results were robust to post hoc sensitivity analyses. The cost of this intervention was £0.76 (€0.91; $1.02) per participant, and it will have a carbon footprint of approximately 140 g CO(2) equivalent per card. One benefit of this approach was the need to only submit one ethics application. CONCLUSIONS: Sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials does not increase retention. Undertaking a SWAT within multiple randomised controlled trials at the same time is, however, possible. This approach should be used more often to build an evidence base to support selection of recruitment and retention strategies. Although no evidence of a boost to retention was found, embedding a SWAT in multiple host trials simultaneously has been shown to be possible. STUDY REGISTRATION: SWAT repository https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,846275,en.pdf#search=SWAT%2082.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8669570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86695702021-12-28 Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials Coleman, Elizabeth Arundel, Catherine Clark, Laura Doherty, Laura Gillies, Katie Hewitt, Catherine Innes, Karen Parker, Adwoa Torgerson, David Treweek, Shaun BMJ Research OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials to increase retention rate at follow-ups, and to explore the feasibility of doing a study within a trial (SWAT) across multiple host trials simultaneously. DESIGN: Randomised SWAT conducted simultaneously across eight host trials. SETTING: Eight randomised controlled trials researching various areas including surgery and smoking cessation. PARTICIPANTS: 3223 trial participants who were still due at least one follow-up from their host randomised controlled trial. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomised (1:1, separately by each host trial) to either received a Christmas card in mid-December 2019 or to not receive a card. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of participants completing their next follow-up (retention rate) within their host randomised controlled trial. RESULTS: 1469 participants (age 16-94 years; 70% (n=1033) female; 96% (813/847) white ethnicity) across the eight host randomised controlled trials were involved in the analysis (cut short owing to covid-19). No evidence was found of a difference in retention rate between the two arms for any of the host trials when analysed separately or when the results were combined (85.3% (639/749) for cards versus 85.4% (615/720) for no card; odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.29; P=0.77). No difference was observed when comparing just participants who were due a follow-up in the 30 days after receiving the card (odds ratio 0.96, 0.42 to 2.21). No evidence of a difference in time to complete the questionnaire was found (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.13; P=0.80). These results were robust to post hoc sensitivity analyses. The cost of this intervention was £0.76 (€0.91; $1.02) per participant, and it will have a carbon footprint of approximately 140 g CO(2) equivalent per card. One benefit of this approach was the need to only submit one ethics application. CONCLUSIONS: Sending Christmas cards to participants in randomised controlled trials does not increase retention. Undertaking a SWAT within multiple randomised controlled trials at the same time is, however, possible. This approach should be used more often to build an evidence base to support selection of recruitment and retention strategies. Although no evidence of a boost to retention was found, embedding a SWAT in multiple host trials simultaneously has been shown to be possible. STUDY REGISTRATION: SWAT repository https://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/FileStore/Filetoupload,846275,en.pdf#search=SWAT%2082. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8669570/ /pubmed/34906985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067742 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Coleman, Elizabeth
Arundel, Catherine
Clark, Laura
Doherty, Laura
Gillies, Katie
Hewitt, Catherine
Innes, Karen
Parker, Adwoa
Torgerson, David
Treweek, Shaun
Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title_full Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title_fullStr Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title_full_unstemmed Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title_short Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
title_sort bah humbug! association between sending christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067742
work_keys_str_mv AT colemanelizabeth bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT arundelcatherine bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT clarklaura bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT dohertylaura bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT gillieskatie bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT hewittcatherine bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT inneskaren bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT parkeradwoa bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT torgersondavid bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials
AT treweekshaun bahhumbugassociationbetweensendingchristmascardstotrialparticipantsandtrialretentionrandomisedstudywithinatrialconductedsimultaneouslyacrosseighthosttrials