Cargando…

Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Qing, Kong, Xiang-chuang, Liu, Ding-Xi, Zhou, Kun, Guo, Yi-hao, Lei, Zi-Qiao, Zheng, Chuan-sheng, Yang, Fan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327
_version_ 1784614926141095936
author Fu, Qing
Kong, Xiang-chuang
Liu, Ding-Xi
Zhou, Kun
Guo, Yi-hao
Lei, Zi-Qiao
Zheng, Chuan-sheng
Yang, Fan
author_facet Fu, Qing
Kong, Xiang-chuang
Liu, Ding-Xi
Zhou, Kun
Guo, Yi-hao
Lei, Zi-Qiao
Zheng, Chuan-sheng
Yang, Fan
author_sort Fu, Qing
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients with suspected orbital tumors were enrolled to perform the two DWIs with comparable spatial resolution on 3T. The overall image qualities, geometric distortions, susceptibility artifacts, and lesion conspicuities were scored by using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Quantitative measurements, including contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), geometric distortion rates (GDRs), and lesion sizes, were calculated and compared. The two ADCs for differentiating malignant from benign orbital tumors were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kappa statistic, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used. Results: TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI performed superior in all subjective scores and quantitative GDR evaluation than rs-EPI (p < 0.001), and excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for Kappa value ranging from 0.876 to 1.000. ADC(lesion) of TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI was significantly higher than those of rs-EPI (p < 0.001). Mean ADC of malignant tumors was significantly lower than that of benign tumors both in two DWIs. However, the AUC for differentiating malignant and benign tumors showed no significant difference in the two DWIs (0.860 vs. 0.854, p = 0.7448). Sensitivity and specificity could achieve 92.86% and 72.73% for TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI with a cutoff value of 1.23 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s, and 85.71% and 81.82% for rs-EPI with a cutoff value of 0.99 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s. Conclusion: Compared with rs-EPI, TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI showed minimized geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts significantly improved the image quality for orbital tumors and achieved comparable diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign orbital tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8670178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86701782021-12-15 Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Fu, Qing Kong, Xiang-chuang Liu, Ding-Xi Zhou, Kun Guo, Yi-hao Lei, Zi-Qiao Zheng, Chuan-sheng Yang, Fan Front Neurosci Neuroscience Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients with suspected orbital tumors were enrolled to perform the two DWIs with comparable spatial resolution on 3T. The overall image qualities, geometric distortions, susceptibility artifacts, and lesion conspicuities were scored by using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Quantitative measurements, including contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), geometric distortion rates (GDRs), and lesion sizes, were calculated and compared. The two ADCs for differentiating malignant from benign orbital tumors were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kappa statistic, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used. Results: TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI performed superior in all subjective scores and quantitative GDR evaluation than rs-EPI (p < 0.001), and excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for Kappa value ranging from 0.876 to 1.000. ADC(lesion) of TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI was significantly higher than those of rs-EPI (p < 0.001). Mean ADC of malignant tumors was significantly lower than that of benign tumors both in two DWIs. However, the AUC for differentiating malignant and benign tumors showed no significant difference in the two DWIs (0.860 vs. 0.854, p = 0.7448). Sensitivity and specificity could achieve 92.86% and 72.73% for TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI with a cutoff value of 1.23 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s, and 85.71% and 81.82% for rs-EPI with a cutoff value of 0.99 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s. Conclusion: Compared with rs-EPI, TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI showed minimized geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts significantly improved the image quality for orbital tumors and achieved comparable diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign orbital tumors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8670178/ /pubmed/34916899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fu, Kong, Liu, Zhou, Guo, Lei, Zheng and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Fu, Qing
Kong, Xiang-chuang
Liu, Ding-Xi
Zhou, Kun
Guo, Yi-hao
Lei, Zi-Qiao
Zheng, Chuan-sheng
Yang, Fan
Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title_full Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title_fullStr Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title_short Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
title_sort turbo gradient and spin echo propeller-diffusion weighted imaging for orbital tumors: a comparative study with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327
work_keys_str_mv AT fuqing turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT kongxiangchuang turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT liudingxi turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT zhoukun turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT guoyihao turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT leiziqiao turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT zhengchuansheng turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging
AT yangfan turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging