Cargando…
Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging
Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327 |
_version_ | 1784614926141095936 |
---|---|
author | Fu, Qing Kong, Xiang-chuang Liu, Ding-Xi Zhou, Kun Guo, Yi-hao Lei, Zi-Qiao Zheng, Chuan-sheng Yang, Fan |
author_facet | Fu, Qing Kong, Xiang-chuang Liu, Ding-Xi Zhou, Kun Guo, Yi-hao Lei, Zi-Qiao Zheng, Chuan-sheng Yang, Fan |
author_sort | Fu, Qing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients with suspected orbital tumors were enrolled to perform the two DWIs with comparable spatial resolution on 3T. The overall image qualities, geometric distortions, susceptibility artifacts, and lesion conspicuities were scored by using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Quantitative measurements, including contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), geometric distortion rates (GDRs), and lesion sizes, were calculated and compared. The two ADCs for differentiating malignant from benign orbital tumors were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kappa statistic, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used. Results: TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI performed superior in all subjective scores and quantitative GDR evaluation than rs-EPI (p < 0.001), and excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for Kappa value ranging from 0.876 to 1.000. ADC(lesion) of TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI was significantly higher than those of rs-EPI (p < 0.001). Mean ADC of malignant tumors was significantly lower than that of benign tumors both in two DWIs. However, the AUC for differentiating malignant and benign tumors showed no significant difference in the two DWIs (0.860 vs. 0.854, p = 0.7448). Sensitivity and specificity could achieve 92.86% and 72.73% for TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI with a cutoff value of 1.23 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s, and 85.71% and 81.82% for rs-EPI with a cutoff value of 0.99 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s. Conclusion: Compared with rs-EPI, TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI showed minimized geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts significantly improved the image quality for orbital tumors and achieved comparable diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign orbital tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8670178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86701782021-12-15 Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging Fu, Qing Kong, Xiang-chuang Liu, Ding-Xi Zhou, Kun Guo, Yi-hao Lei, Zi-Qiao Zheng, Chuan-sheng Yang, Fan Front Neurosci Neuroscience Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of turbo gradient and spin echo PROPELLER diffusion-weighted imaging (TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI) vs. readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (rs-EPI) in the evaluation of orbital tumors. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients with suspected orbital tumors were enrolled to perform the two DWIs with comparable spatial resolution on 3T. The overall image qualities, geometric distortions, susceptibility artifacts, and lesion conspicuities were scored by using a four-point scale (1, poor; 4, excellent). Quantitative measurements, including contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), geometric distortion rates (GDRs), and lesion sizes, were calculated and compared. The two ADCs for differentiating malignant from benign orbital tumors were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kappa statistic, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used. Results: TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI performed superior in all subjective scores and quantitative GDR evaluation than rs-EPI (p < 0.001), and excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for Kappa value ranging from 0.876 to 1.000. ADC(lesion) of TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI was significantly higher than those of rs-EPI (p < 0.001). Mean ADC of malignant tumors was significantly lower than that of benign tumors both in two DWIs. However, the AUC for differentiating malignant and benign tumors showed no significant difference in the two DWIs (0.860 vs. 0.854, p = 0.7448). Sensitivity and specificity could achieve 92.86% and 72.73% for TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI with a cutoff value of 1.23 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s, and 85.71% and 81.82% for rs-EPI with a cutoff value of 0.99 × 10(–3) mm(2)/s. Conclusion: Compared with rs-EPI, TGSE-PROPELLER-DWI showed minimized geometric distortion and susceptibility artifacts significantly improved the image quality for orbital tumors and achieved comparable diagnostic performance in differentiating malignant and benign orbital tumors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8670178/ /pubmed/34916899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327 Text en Copyright © 2021 Fu, Kong, Liu, Zhou, Guo, Lei, Zheng and Yang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Fu, Qing Kong, Xiang-chuang Liu, Ding-Xi Zhou, Kun Guo, Yi-hao Lei, Zi-Qiao Zheng, Chuan-sheng Yang, Fan Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title | Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_full | Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_fullStr | Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_short | Turbo Gradient and Spin Echo PROPELLER-Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Orbital Tumors: A Comparative Study With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging |
title_sort | turbo gradient and spin echo propeller-diffusion weighted imaging for orbital tumors: a comparative study with readout-segmented echo-planar imaging |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.755327 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuqing turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT kongxiangchuang turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT liudingxi turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT zhoukun turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT guoyihao turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT leiziqiao turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT zhengchuansheng turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging AT yangfan turbogradientandspinechopropellerdiffusionweightedimagingfororbitaltumorsacomparativestudywithreadoutsegmentedechoplanarimaging |