Cargando…

Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study

BACKGROUND: In economic evaluation, the quality of life of people with a disability has traditionally been assessed using preference-based instruments designed to measure and value quality of life. To provide robust measurement of the effectiveness of programs designed to improve the quality of life...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crocker, Matthew, Hutchinson, Claire, Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine, Walker, Ruth, Chen, Gang, Ratcliffe, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01901-x
_version_ 1784614933898461184
author Crocker, Matthew
Hutchinson, Claire
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Walker, Ruth
Chen, Gang
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_facet Crocker, Matthew
Hutchinson, Claire
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Walker, Ruth
Chen, Gang
Ratcliffe, Julie
author_sort Crocker, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In economic evaluation, the quality of life of people with a disability has traditionally been assessed using preference-based instruments designed to measure and value quality of life. To provide robust measurement of the effectiveness of programs designed to improve the quality of life of people living with a disability, preference-based measures need to be sufficiently sensitive to detect incremental changes in the quality of life dimensions that are most important to people who have a disability. This study sought to explore whether there was a difference in the ranked order of importance of quality of life dimensions between people with a disability and people without a disability. METHODS: An online survey was developed and administered Australia wide. The first sample (n = 410) comprised adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a disability (n = 208) and family carers of person/s with a disability who were asked to respond on behalf of the person with a disability (n = 202). The second sample included adults without disability (n = 443). Respondents were asked to rank the importance of 12 quality of life dimensions extracted from the content of established preference-based quality of life measures (EQ-5D, AQoL and ASCOT). RESULTS: People with a disability placed relatively higher importance on broader quality of life dimensions (e.g. Control, Independence, Self-care) relative to health status focused dimensions (e.g. Vision, Hearing, Physical mobility). This distinction was less differentiable for those ‘without a disability’. The biggest differences in ranked importance of dimensions were in: Vision (‘with disability’ = 10th, ‘without disability’ = 4th), Self-care (‘with disability’ = 3rd, ‘without disability’ = 7th) and Mental well-being (‘with disability’ = 6th, ‘without disability’ = 2nd). CONCLUSIONS: The relative importance of quality of life dimensions for people with a disability differs to people without a disability. Quality of life is a key outcome for economic evaluation and for assessing the impact of disability care policy and practice in Australia and internationally. It is important that the effectiveness of interventions is measured and valued in ways which are fully reflective of the quality of life preferences of people with a disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8670215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86702152021-12-15 Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study Crocker, Matthew Hutchinson, Claire Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine Walker, Ruth Chen, Gang Ratcliffe, Julie Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: In economic evaluation, the quality of life of people with a disability has traditionally been assessed using preference-based instruments designed to measure and value quality of life. To provide robust measurement of the effectiveness of programs designed to improve the quality of life of people living with a disability, preference-based measures need to be sufficiently sensitive to detect incremental changes in the quality of life dimensions that are most important to people who have a disability. This study sought to explore whether there was a difference in the ranked order of importance of quality of life dimensions between people with a disability and people without a disability. METHODS: An online survey was developed and administered Australia wide. The first sample (n = 410) comprised adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a disability (n = 208) and family carers of person/s with a disability who were asked to respond on behalf of the person with a disability (n = 202). The second sample included adults without disability (n = 443). Respondents were asked to rank the importance of 12 quality of life dimensions extracted from the content of established preference-based quality of life measures (EQ-5D, AQoL and ASCOT). RESULTS: People with a disability placed relatively higher importance on broader quality of life dimensions (e.g. Control, Independence, Self-care) relative to health status focused dimensions (e.g. Vision, Hearing, Physical mobility). This distinction was less differentiable for those ‘without a disability’. The biggest differences in ranked importance of dimensions were in: Vision (‘with disability’ = 10th, ‘without disability’ = 4th), Self-care (‘with disability’ = 3rd, ‘without disability’ = 7th) and Mental well-being (‘with disability’ = 6th, ‘without disability’ = 2nd). CONCLUSIONS: The relative importance of quality of life dimensions for people with a disability differs to people without a disability. Quality of life is a key outcome for economic evaluation and for assessing the impact of disability care policy and practice in Australia and internationally. It is important that the effectiveness of interventions is measured and valued in ways which are fully reflective of the quality of life preferences of people with a disability. BioMed Central 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8670215/ /pubmed/34906156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01901-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Crocker, Matthew
Hutchinson, Claire
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Walker, Ruth
Chen, Gang
Ratcliffe, Julie
Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title_full Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title_fullStr Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title_short Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
title_sort assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01901-x
work_keys_str_mv AT crockermatthew assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy
AT hutchinsonclaire assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy
AT mpundukaambwachristine assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy
AT walkerruth assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy
AT chengang assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy
AT ratcliffejulie assessingtherelativeimportanceofkeyqualityoflifedimensionsforpeoplewithandwithoutadisabilityanempiricalrankingcomparisonstudy