Cargando…
Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17 |
_version_ | 1784614982431801344 |
---|---|
author | Mahajan, Swati Rajwanshi, Arvind Srinivasan, Radhika Radotra, Bishan Dass Panda, Naresh |
author_facet | Mahajan, Swati Rajwanshi, Arvind Srinivasan, Radhika Radotra, Bishan Dass Panda, Naresh |
author_sort | Mahajan, Swati |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in thyroid FNA samples for diagnostic efficacy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective case-control study using split sample analysis in 200 non-consecutive cases of thyroid FNA reported as per the Bethesda system. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated in CS and LBC preparations. Cellularity was scored as 0–3. Based on diagnostic efficacy, they were categorized into three groups:(i) CS and LBC equivalent for diagnosis, (ii) CS better than LBC, and (iii) LBC better than CS for providing the diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired t test for cellularity scores and descriptive for diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: There were 7 unsatisfactory, 118 benign, 10 atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 25 follicular neoplasms, 6 suspicious for malignancy, and 34 malignant thyroid FNA cases based on routine conventional smears. Cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher than paired LBC smears (paired t test, P < 0.005). Comparison of overall diagnostic efficacy showed that LBC and CS were equivalent in 59% of cases; CS was superior to LBC in 37% cases and LBC was better than CS in 4% cases only. LBC smears showed higher unsatisfactory rate as compared to CS (18% vs. 3.5%). In category 2, the two techniques were equivalent in 87% of cases. In categories 4 and 6, CS were superior to LBC. CONCLUSIONS: In thyroid FNA cases, conventional smears are superior to LBC preparation in terms of cellularity and diagnostic efficacy and hence, LBC preparations should not replace conventional smears for making a routine cytomorphological diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8670454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86704542022-01-06 Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears Mahajan, Swati Rajwanshi, Arvind Srinivasan, Radhika Radotra, Bishan Dass Panda, Naresh J Cytol Original Article CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in thyroid FNA samples for diagnostic efficacy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective case-control study using split sample analysis in 200 non-consecutive cases of thyroid FNA reported as per the Bethesda system. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated in CS and LBC preparations. Cellularity was scored as 0–3. Based on diagnostic efficacy, they were categorized into three groups:(i) CS and LBC equivalent for diagnosis, (ii) CS better than LBC, and (iii) LBC better than CS for providing the diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired t test for cellularity scores and descriptive for diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: There were 7 unsatisfactory, 118 benign, 10 atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 25 follicular neoplasms, 6 suspicious for malignancy, and 34 malignant thyroid FNA cases based on routine conventional smears. Cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher than paired LBC smears (paired t test, P < 0.005). Comparison of overall diagnostic efficacy showed that LBC and CS were equivalent in 59% of cases; CS was superior to LBC in 37% cases and LBC was better than CS in 4% cases only. LBC smears showed higher unsatisfactory rate as compared to CS (18% vs. 3.5%). In category 2, the two techniques were equivalent in 87% of cases. In categories 4 and 6, CS were superior to LBC. CONCLUSIONS: In thyroid FNA cases, conventional smears are superior to LBC preparation in terms of cellularity and diagnostic efficacy and hence, LBC preparations should not replace conventional smears for making a routine cytomorphological diagnosis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8670454/ /pubmed/35002112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Cytology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahajan, Swati Rajwanshi, Arvind Srinivasan, Radhika Radotra, Bishan Dass Panda, Naresh Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title | Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title_full | Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title_fullStr | Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title_full_unstemmed | Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title_short | Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears |
title_sort | should liquid based cytology (lbc) be applied to thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology samples?: comparative analysis of conventional and lbc smears |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahajanswati shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears AT rajwanshiarvind shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears AT srinivasanradhika shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears AT radotrabishandass shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears AT pandanaresh shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears |