Cargando…

Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears

CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahajan, Swati, Rajwanshi, Arvind, Srinivasan, Radhika, Radotra, Bishan Dass, Panda, Naresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002112
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17
_version_ 1784614982431801344
author Mahajan, Swati
Rajwanshi, Arvind
Srinivasan, Radhika
Radotra, Bishan Dass
Panda, Naresh
author_facet Mahajan, Swati
Rajwanshi, Arvind
Srinivasan, Radhika
Radotra, Bishan Dass
Panda, Naresh
author_sort Mahajan, Swati
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in thyroid FNA samples for diagnostic efficacy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective case-control study using split sample analysis in 200 non-consecutive cases of thyroid FNA reported as per the Bethesda system. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated in CS and LBC preparations. Cellularity was scored as 0–3. Based on diagnostic efficacy, they were categorized into three groups:(i) CS and LBC equivalent for diagnosis, (ii) CS better than LBC, and (iii) LBC better than CS for providing the diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired t test for cellularity scores and descriptive for diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: There were 7 unsatisfactory, 118 benign, 10 atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 25 follicular neoplasms, 6 suspicious for malignancy, and 34 malignant thyroid FNA cases based on routine conventional smears. Cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher than paired LBC smears (paired t test, P < 0.005). Comparison of overall diagnostic efficacy showed that LBC and CS were equivalent in 59% of cases; CS was superior to LBC in 37% cases and LBC was better than CS in 4% cases only. LBC smears showed higher unsatisfactory rate as compared to CS (18% vs. 3.5%). In category 2, the two techniques were equivalent in 87% of cases. In categories 4 and 6, CS were superior to LBC. CONCLUSIONS: In thyroid FNA cases, conventional smears are superior to LBC preparation in terms of cellularity and diagnostic efficacy and hence, LBC preparations should not replace conventional smears for making a routine cytomorphological diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8670454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86704542022-01-06 Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears Mahajan, Swati Rajwanshi, Arvind Srinivasan, Radhika Radotra, Bishan Dass Panda, Naresh J Cytol Original Article CONTEXT: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a cyto-preparatory technique that may be applied to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples. However, its efficacy over conventional smears (CS) in thyroid is controversial. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare CS versus LBC (SurePath, BD) preparations in thyroid FNA samples for diagnostic efficacy. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective case-control study using split sample analysis in 200 non-consecutive cases of thyroid FNA reported as per the Bethesda system. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Detailed cytomorphological features were evaluated in CS and LBC preparations. Cellularity was scored as 0–3. Based on diagnostic efficacy, they were categorized into three groups:(i) CS and LBC equivalent for diagnosis, (ii) CS better than LBC, and (iii) LBC better than CS for providing the diagnosis. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Paired t test for cellularity scores and descriptive for diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS: There were 7 unsatisfactory, 118 benign, 10 atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance, 25 follicular neoplasms, 6 suspicious for malignancy, and 34 malignant thyroid FNA cases based on routine conventional smears. Cellularity of conventional smears was significantly higher than paired LBC smears (paired t test, P < 0.005). Comparison of overall diagnostic efficacy showed that LBC and CS were equivalent in 59% of cases; CS was superior to LBC in 37% cases and LBC was better than CS in 4% cases only. LBC smears showed higher unsatisfactory rate as compared to CS (18% vs. 3.5%). In category 2, the two techniques were equivalent in 87% of cases. In categories 4 and 6, CS were superior to LBC. CONCLUSIONS: In thyroid FNA cases, conventional smears are superior to LBC preparation in terms of cellularity and diagnostic efficacy and hence, LBC preparations should not replace conventional smears for making a routine cytomorphological diagnosis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8670454/ /pubmed/35002112 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Cytology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahajan, Swati
Rajwanshi, Arvind
Srinivasan, Radhika
Radotra, Bishan Dass
Panda, Naresh
Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title_full Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title_fullStr Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title_full_unstemmed Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title_short Should Liquid Based Cytology (LBC) be Applied to Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Samples?: Comparative Analysis of Conventional and LBC Smears
title_sort should liquid based cytology (lbc) be applied to thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology samples?: comparative analysis of conventional and lbc smears
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002112
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_6_17
work_keys_str_mv AT mahajanswati shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears
AT rajwanshiarvind shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears
AT srinivasanradhika shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears
AT radotrabishandass shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears
AT pandanaresh shouldliquidbasedcytologylbcbeappliedtothyroidfineneedleaspirationcytologysamplescomparativeanalysisofconventionalandlbcsmears