Cargando…

Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years

INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland malignancies account for 2 to 4% of head and neck cancers. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used in preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Although FNAC is a highly reliable technique for preoperative diagnosis, there were no consensus on salivary gla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isgor, Irem S., Ercetin, Selim Yigit, Enver, Necati, Cinel, Leyla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_193_20
_version_ 1784614983106035712
author Isgor, Irem S.
Ercetin, Selim Yigit
Enver, Necati
Cinel, Leyla
author_facet Isgor, Irem S.
Ercetin, Selim Yigit
Enver, Necati
Cinel, Leyla
author_sort Isgor, Irem S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland malignancies account for 2 to 4% of head and neck cancers. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used in preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Although FNAC is a highly reliable technique for preoperative diagnosis, there were no consensus on salivary gland cytopathology reporting. Recently, an international group has recommended a classification system for salivary gland FNAC reporting titled “Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology” (MSRSGC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usability of the Milan System, its ability to determine the risk of malignancy for each category, with comparisons of inital cytologic and final histopathological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of salivary gland lesion FNAC in our department from 2013 to 2019. A total of 578 FNACs were performed in 514 patients. Of these, 85 cases had surgical follow-up (parotid gland, n = 73, submandibular gland, n = 12). The cytological samples were categorized according to the MSRSGC into six categories by two pathologists. The risk of malignancy (ROM) and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each diagnostic categories. RESULTS: A total of 85 aspirates of the patients with follow-up, the MSRSGC diagnostic categories were as follows: non-diagnostic in 7 aspirates (8.2%), non-neoplastic in 3 (3.5%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in 9 (10.5%), benign neoplasm in 43 (50.5%), salivary gland neoplasm of undetermined malignant potential in 7 (8.2%), suspicious for malignancy in 10 (11.7%), and malignant in 6 (7%). The ROM for each category was 28, 5%, 0%, 33%, 0%, 28.5%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FNAC plays a critical role in the evaluation of patients with salivary gland lesions. The MSRSGC helps in the standardization of the process of diagnosis and clinical management of salivary gland lesions, especially of AUS and SUMP categories that are indeterminate categories in nature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8670457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86704572022-01-06 Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years Isgor, Irem S. Ercetin, Selim Yigit Enver, Necati Cinel, Leyla J Cytol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Salivary gland malignancies account for 2 to 4% of head and neck cancers. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is used in preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Although FNAC is a highly reliable technique for preoperative diagnosis, there were no consensus on salivary gland cytopathology reporting. Recently, an international group has recommended a classification system for salivary gland FNAC reporting titled “Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology” (MSRSGC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usability of the Milan System, its ability to determine the risk of malignancy for each category, with comparisons of inital cytologic and final histopathological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of salivary gland lesion FNAC in our department from 2013 to 2019. A total of 578 FNACs were performed in 514 patients. Of these, 85 cases had surgical follow-up (parotid gland, n = 73, submandibular gland, n = 12). The cytological samples were categorized according to the MSRSGC into six categories by two pathologists. The risk of malignancy (ROM) and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each diagnostic categories. RESULTS: A total of 85 aspirates of the patients with follow-up, the MSRSGC diagnostic categories were as follows: non-diagnostic in 7 aspirates (8.2%), non-neoplastic in 3 (3.5%), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in 9 (10.5%), benign neoplasm in 43 (50.5%), salivary gland neoplasm of undetermined malignant potential in 7 (8.2%), suspicious for malignancy in 10 (11.7%), and malignant in 6 (7%). The ROM for each category was 28, 5%, 0%, 33%, 0%, 28.5%, 90%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FNAC plays a critical role in the evaluation of patients with salivary gland lesions. The MSRSGC helps in the standardization of the process of diagnosis and clinical management of salivary gland lesions, especially of AUS and SUMP categories that are indeterminate categories in nature. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8670457/ /pubmed/35002113 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_193_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Cytology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Isgor, Irem S.
Ercetin, Selim Yigit
Enver, Necati
Cinel, Leyla
Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title_full Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title_fullStr Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title_full_unstemmed Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title_short Histopathological Review of Diagnostic Categories of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology – An Institutional Experience of 6 Years
title_sort histopathological review of diagnostic categories of the milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology – an institutional experience of 6 years
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002113
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOC.JOC_193_20
work_keys_str_mv AT isgorirems histopathologicalreviewofdiagnosticcategoriesofthemilansystemforreportingsalivaryglandcytopathologyaninstitutionalexperienceof6years
AT ercetinselimyigit histopathologicalreviewofdiagnosticcategoriesofthemilansystemforreportingsalivaryglandcytopathologyaninstitutionalexperienceof6years
AT envernecati histopathologicalreviewofdiagnosticcategoriesofthemilansystemforreportingsalivaryglandcytopathologyaninstitutionalexperienceof6years
AT cinelleyla histopathologicalreviewofdiagnosticcategoriesofthemilansystemforreportingsalivaryglandcytopathologyaninstitutionalexperienceof6years