Cargando…
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.748944 |
_version_ | 1784614991112962048 |
---|---|
author | Granata, Vincenza Coppola, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Fusco, Roberta Tafuto, Salvatore Izzo, Francesco Reginelli, Alfonso Maggialetti, Nicola Buccicardi, Duccio Frittoli, Barbara Rengo, Marco Bortolotto, Chandra Prost, Roberto Lacasella, Giorgia Viola Montella, Marco Ciaghi, Eleonora Bellifemine, Francesco De Muzio, Federica Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia De Filippo, Massimo Cappabianca, Salvatore Barresi, Carmelo Iafrate, Franco Stoppino, Luca Pio Laghi, Andrea Grassi, Roberto Brunese, Luca Neri, Emanuele Miele, Vittorio Faggioni, Lorenzo |
author_facet | Granata, Vincenza Coppola, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Fusco, Roberta Tafuto, Salvatore Izzo, Francesco Reginelli, Alfonso Maggialetti, Nicola Buccicardi, Duccio Frittoli, Barbara Rengo, Marco Bortolotto, Chandra Prost, Roberto Lacasella, Giorgia Viola Montella, Marco Ciaghi, Eleonora Bellifemine, Francesco De Muzio, Federica Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia De Filippo, Massimo Cappabianca, Salvatore Barresi, Carmelo Iafrate, Franco Stoppino, Luca Pio Laghi, Andrea Grassi, Roberto Brunese, Luca Neri, Emanuele Miele, Vittorio Faggioni, Lorenzo |
author_sort | Granata, Vincenza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. RESULTS: The final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n=13 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n=8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n=17 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8670531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86705312021-12-15 Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal Granata, Vincenza Coppola, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Fusco, Roberta Tafuto, Salvatore Izzo, Francesco Reginelli, Alfonso Maggialetti, Nicola Buccicardi, Duccio Frittoli, Barbara Rengo, Marco Bortolotto, Chandra Prost, Roberto Lacasella, Giorgia Viola Montella, Marco Ciaghi, Eleonora Bellifemine, Francesco De Muzio, Federica Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia De Filippo, Massimo Cappabianca, Salvatore Barresi, Carmelo Iafrate, Franco Stoppino, Luca Pio Laghi, Andrea Grassi, Roberto Brunese, Luca Neri, Emanuele Miele, Vittorio Faggioni, Lorenzo Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming increasingly necessary and has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured CT-based reports in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A Modified Delphi process was used to develop the SR and to assess a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. RESULTS: The final SR version was built by including n=16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n=13 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n=8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n=17 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 54 items were included in the final version of the SR. Both in the first and second round, all sections received more than a good rating: a mean value of 4.7 and range of 4.2-5.0 in the first round and a mean value 4.9 and range of 4.9-5 in the second round. In the first round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a poor 0.57: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.7 (range 1-5) and 728 (mean value 52.00 and standard deviation 2.83), respectively. In the second round, the Cα correlation coefficient was a good 0.82: the overall mean score of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.9 (range 4-5) and 760 (mean value 54.29 and standard deviation 1.64), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present SR, based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise following in-depth discussion between expert radiologists in gastro-enteric and oncological imaging, derived from a multidisciplinary agreement between a radiologist, medical oncologist and surgeon in order to obtain the most appropriate communication tool for referring physicians. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8670531/ /pubmed/34917023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.748944 Text en Copyright © 2021 Granata, Coppola, Grassi, Fusco, Tafuto, Izzo, Reginelli, Maggialetti, Buccicardi, Frittoli, Rengo, Bortolotto, Prost, Lacasella, Montella, Ciaghi, Bellifemine, De Muzio, Danti, Grazzini, De Filippo, Cappabianca, Barresi, Iafrate, Stoppino, Laghi, Grassi, Brunese, Neri, Miele and Faggioni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Granata, Vincenza Coppola, Francesca Grassi, Roberta Fusco, Roberta Tafuto, Salvatore Izzo, Francesco Reginelli, Alfonso Maggialetti, Nicola Buccicardi, Duccio Frittoli, Barbara Rengo, Marco Bortolotto, Chandra Prost, Roberto Lacasella, Giorgia Viola Montella, Marco Ciaghi, Eleonora Bellifemine, Francesco De Muzio, Federica Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia De Filippo, Massimo Cappabianca, Salvatore Barresi, Carmelo Iafrate, Franco Stoppino, Luca Pio Laghi, Andrea Grassi, Roberto Brunese, Luca Neri, Emanuele Miele, Vittorio Faggioni, Lorenzo Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title | Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title_full | Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title_fullStr | Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title_full_unstemmed | Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title_short | Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography in the Staging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Delphi Consensus Proposal |
title_sort | structured reporting of computed tomography in the staging of neuroendocrine neoplasms: a delphi consensus proposal |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.748944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granatavincenza structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT coppolafrancesca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT grassiroberta structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT fuscoroberta structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT tafutosalvatore structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT izzofrancesco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT reginellialfonso structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT maggialettinicola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT buccicardiduccio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT frittolibarbara structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT rengomarco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT bortolottochandra structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT prostroberto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT lacasellagiorgiaviola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT montellamarco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT ciaghieleonora structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT bellifeminefrancesco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT demuziofederica structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT dantiginevra structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT grazzinigiulia structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT defilippomassimo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT cappabiancasalvatore structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT barresicarmelo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT iafratefranco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT stoppinolucapio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT laghiandrea structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT grassiroberto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT bruneseluca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT neriemanuele structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT mielevittorio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal AT faggionilorenzo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyinthestagingofneuroendocrineneoplasmsadelphiconsensusproposal |