Redisplacement of paediatric distal radius fractures: what is the problem?

PURPOSE: Distal radius fractures represent one of the most common fractures in children. Our purpose is to analyze risk factors for redisplacement in children with distal radius fractures treated by means of closed reduction and plaster cast immobilization. METHODS: Retrospective study, including children under the age of 17 years, who underwent closed manipulation and cast immobilization for a distal third radius fracture, between 2012 and 2015. Preoperative radiographs were reviewed for initial translation, angulation and shortening, distance of the fracture from the physis, degree of fracture obliquity and the presence of an ulna fracture. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for translation, angulation and shortening, as well as the quality of closed reduction. Cast index, gap index and three-point index, were measured on the postoperative radiographs. Redisplacement and re-intervention during follow-up were registered. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were included in this study. Comparison between post-reduction and immediate post-cast removal radiographs did not show any statistically significant difference between translation or shortening. Coronal (p = 0.002) and sagittal (p = 0.002) angulation showed a statistically significant difference, but both median values remained below cut-off values for redisplacement. Redisplacement was observed in four patients. Only one patient underwent remanipulation. All four had full remodelling and proper radiological alignment at final follow-up. Quality of reduction was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for redisplacement (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Closed reduction and cast immobilization under general anaesthesia yields good results in the treatment of distal forearm fractures in paediatric patients. Quality of reduction was the only risk factor that we found to be predictive of redisplacement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III – Retrospective comparative study