Cargando…

Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID‐19 forced healthcare systems to implement telehealth programs, facilitated in Massachusetts by a policy requiring insurers to reimburse for telehealth visits. Prior studies suggest that telehealth is effective for obstetric care, but little is known about its implementatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith, Qasba, Neena, Cayton, Colby, Niakan, Shiva, Knee, Alexander, Goff, Sarah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.455
_version_ 1784615023485648896
author Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith
Qasba, Neena
Cayton, Colby
Niakan, Shiva
Knee, Alexander
Goff, Sarah L.
author_facet Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith
Qasba, Neena
Cayton, Colby
Niakan, Shiva
Knee, Alexander
Goff, Sarah L.
author_sort Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID‐19 forced healthcare systems to implement telehealth programs, facilitated in Massachusetts by a policy requiring insurers to reimburse for telehealth visits. Prior studies suggest that telehealth is effective for obstetric care, but little is known about its implementation in response to policy changes in underserved communities. We utilized the RE‐AIM framework to evaluate telehealth implementation in a large academic urban obstetric practice that serves a medically underserved population. METHODS: RE‐AIM elements were assessed through retrospective review of electronic health record (EHR) data for all obstetric encounters between March 19 and August 31, 2020 and review of clinic implementation processes. Data extracted included demographics, number and type (in‐person or telehealth) of prenatal visits, prenatal diagnoses, delivery outcomes, and number and type of postpartum visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients (60.6% Hispanic; 13.2% primary language Spanish) had 1788 prenatal visits, of which 698 (39.0%) were telehealth visits. A total of 209 patients had 230 postpartum visits, of which 101 (48.3%) were telehealth visits. The Reach of the intervention increased from 0% of patients at baseline to 69% in August. Effectiveness measures were limited but suggested potential for earlier diagnosis of some prenatal conditions. Adoption was high, with all 30 providers using telehealth, and the telehealth was found to likely be feasible and acceptable based on uptake. Increases in the percentage of telehealth visits over time and continuation post‐lockdown suggested maintenance was potentially achievable. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic has changed traditional approaches to healthcare delivery. We demonstrate that the use of the RE‐AIM framework can be effective in facilitating implementation of telephone visits in a large academic urban obstetric practice after state‐level policy change. This may be of particular importance in settings serving patients at higher risk for maternal morbidity and poor birth outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8670728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86707282021-12-21 Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith Qasba, Neena Cayton, Colby Niakan, Shiva Knee, Alexander Goff, Sarah L. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: COVID‐19 forced healthcare systems to implement telehealth programs, facilitated in Massachusetts by a policy requiring insurers to reimburse for telehealth visits. Prior studies suggest that telehealth is effective for obstetric care, but little is known about its implementation in response to policy changes in underserved communities. We utilized the RE‐AIM framework to evaluate telehealth implementation in a large academic urban obstetric practice that serves a medically underserved population. METHODS: RE‐AIM elements were assessed through retrospective review of electronic health record (EHR) data for all obstetric encounters between March 19 and August 31, 2020 and review of clinic implementation processes. Data extracted included demographics, number and type (in‐person or telehealth) of prenatal visits, prenatal diagnoses, delivery outcomes, and number and type of postpartum visits. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients (60.6% Hispanic; 13.2% primary language Spanish) had 1788 prenatal visits, of which 698 (39.0%) were telehealth visits. A total of 209 patients had 230 postpartum visits, of which 101 (48.3%) were telehealth visits. The Reach of the intervention increased from 0% of patients at baseline to 69% in August. Effectiveness measures were limited but suggested potential for earlier diagnosis of some prenatal conditions. Adoption was high, with all 30 providers using telehealth, and the telehealth was found to likely be feasible and acceptable based on uptake. Increases in the percentage of telehealth visits over time and continuation post‐lockdown suggested maintenance was potentially achievable. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID‐19 pandemic has changed traditional approaches to healthcare delivery. We demonstrate that the use of the RE‐AIM framework can be effective in facilitating implementation of telephone visits in a large academic urban obstetric practice after state‐level policy change. This may be of particular importance in settings serving patients at higher risk for maternal morbidity and poor birth outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8670728/ /pubmed/34938899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.455 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Reisinger‐Kindle, Keith
Qasba, Neena
Cayton, Colby
Niakan, Shiva
Knee, Alexander
Goff, Sarah L.
Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title_full Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title_fullStr Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title_short Evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the COVID‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
title_sort evaluation of rapid telehealth implementation for prenatal and postpartum care visits during the covid‐19 pandemic in an academic clinic in springfield, massachusetts, united states of america
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.455
work_keys_str_mv AT reisingerkindlekeith evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica
AT qasbaneena evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica
AT caytoncolby evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica
AT niakanshiva evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica
AT kneealexander evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica
AT goffsarahl evaluationofrapidtelehealthimplementationforprenatalandpostpartumcarevisitsduringthecovid19pandemicinanacademicclinicinspringfieldmassachusettsunitedstatesofamerica