Cargando…
Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials
Background: Health literacy, a recently determined construct plays an important role in how individuals are able to manage their health. A useful approach for the assessment of health literacy is to measure the comprehension of available patient education materials (PEMs). Objective: We aimed at ass...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840 |
_version_ | 1784615028044857344 |
---|---|
author | Szabó, Pálma Bíró, Éva Kósa, Karolina |
author_facet | Szabó, Pálma Bíró, Éva Kósa, Karolina |
author_sort | Szabó, Pálma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Health literacy, a recently determined construct plays an important role in how individuals are able to manage their health. A useful approach for the assessment of health literacy is to measure the comprehension of available patient education materials (PEMs). Objective: We aimed at assessing the usefulness of PEMS available in Hungarian by testing comprehension of selected PEMs in different groups of users. Methods: Comprehension of patient education materials in the domain of healthcare was tested by selecting PEMs and creating questions based on their text in 3 dimensions of health literacy: understand, process/appraise, apply/use. Twenty questions were created that could be answered without pre-existing knowledge by reading the appropriate text taken from PEMs. Comprehension was examined in four groups: laypersons, non-professional healthcare workers, 1st year healthcare students, and 5th year medical students. Readability indices were calculated for the same texts to which questions were created. Results: Laypersons answered <50% of the PEMs-based questions correctly. Non-professional healthcare workers performed better with 57% of right answers but significantly worse than healthcare students or medical students. Those with at least high school qualification (maturity exam) showed significantly higher comprehension compared to those with lower educational attainment. Persons in good or very good health also had significantly better comprehension than those in less favorable health. All readability indices showed that comprehension of the tested PEMs required at least 10 years of schooling or more. Therefore, these PEMS are difficult to understand for persons with less than high school level of education. Conclusion: Rephrasing of the investigated patient educational materials would be recommended so that they better fit the educational attainment of the Hungarian population. Evaluation of the readability and comprehensibility of other PEMs also seems warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8670754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86707542021-12-15 Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials Szabó, Pálma Bíró, Éva Kósa, Karolina Front Public Health Public Health Background: Health literacy, a recently determined construct plays an important role in how individuals are able to manage their health. A useful approach for the assessment of health literacy is to measure the comprehension of available patient education materials (PEMs). Objective: We aimed at assessing the usefulness of PEMS available in Hungarian by testing comprehension of selected PEMs in different groups of users. Methods: Comprehension of patient education materials in the domain of healthcare was tested by selecting PEMs and creating questions based on their text in 3 dimensions of health literacy: understand, process/appraise, apply/use. Twenty questions were created that could be answered without pre-existing knowledge by reading the appropriate text taken from PEMs. Comprehension was examined in four groups: laypersons, non-professional healthcare workers, 1st year healthcare students, and 5th year medical students. Readability indices were calculated for the same texts to which questions were created. Results: Laypersons answered <50% of the PEMs-based questions correctly. Non-professional healthcare workers performed better with 57% of right answers but significantly worse than healthcare students or medical students. Those with at least high school qualification (maturity exam) showed significantly higher comprehension compared to those with lower educational attainment. Persons in good or very good health also had significantly better comprehension than those in less favorable health. All readability indices showed that comprehension of the tested PEMs required at least 10 years of schooling or more. Therefore, these PEMS are difficult to understand for persons with less than high school level of education. Conclusion: Rephrasing of the investigated patient educational materials would be recommended so that they better fit the educational attainment of the Hungarian population. Evaluation of the readability and comprehensibility of other PEMs also seems warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8670754/ /pubmed/34917569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840 Text en Copyright © 2021 Szabó, Bíró and Kósa. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Szabó, Pálma Bíró, Éva Kósa, Karolina Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title | Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title_full | Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title_fullStr | Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title_short | Readability and Comprehension of Printed Patient Education Materials |
title_sort | readability and comprehension of printed patient education materials |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917569 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szabopalma readabilityandcomprehensionofprintedpatienteducationmaterials AT biroeva readabilityandcomprehensionofprintedpatienteducationmaterials AT kosakarolina readabilityandcomprehensionofprintedpatienteducationmaterials |