Cargando…

High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs

Introduction: At a professional level, pianists have a high prevalence of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders. This exploratory crossover study was carried out to assess and compare quantitatively [using high density surface electromyography (HDsEMG)], and qualitatively (using musculoskeletal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra, Russo, Alessandro, D’Emanuele, Samuel, Serafino, Francesca, Merletti, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.743730
_version_ 1784615119132557312
author Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra
Russo, Alessandro
D’Emanuele, Samuel
Serafino, Francesca
Merletti, Roberto
author_facet Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra
Russo, Alessandro
D’Emanuele, Samuel
Serafino, Francesca
Merletti, Roberto
author_sort Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra
collection PubMed
description Introduction: At a professional level, pianists have a high prevalence of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders. This exploratory crossover study was carried out to assess and compare quantitatively [using high density surface electromyography (HDsEMG)], and qualitatively (using musculoskeletal questionnaires) the activity of the lumbar erector spinae muscles (ESM) and the comfort/discomfort in 16 pianists sitting on a standard piano stool (SS) and on an alternative chair (A-chair) with lumbar support and a trunk-thigh angle between 105° and 135°. Materials and Methods: The subjects played for 55 min and HDsEMG was recorded for 20 s every 5 min. For the quantitative assessment of the muscle activity, the spatial mean of the root mean square (RMS(ROA)) and the centroid of the region of activity (ROA) of the ESM were compared between the two chairs. For the qualitative assessment, musculoskeletal questionnaire-based scales were used: General Comfort Rating (GCR); Helander and Zhang’s comfort (HZc) and discomfort (HZd); and Body Part Discomfort (BPD). Results: When using the A-chair, 14 out of 16 pianists (87.5%) showed a significantly lower RMS(ROA) on the left and right side (p < 0.05). The mixed effects model revealed that both chairs (F = 28.21, p < 0.001) and sides (F = 204.01, p < 0.001) contributed to the mean RMS(ROA) variation by subject (Z = 2.64, p = 0.004). GCR comfort indicated that participants found the A-Chair to be “quite comfortable,” and the SS to be “uncomfortable.” GCR discomfort indicated that the SS caused more numbness than the A-Chair (p = 0.05) and indicated the A-Chair to cause more feeling of cramps (p = 0.034). No difference was found on HZc (p = 0.091) or HZd (p = 0.31) between chairs. Female participants (n = 9) reported greater comfort when using the A-Chair than the SS (F = 7.09, p = 0.01) with respect to males. No differences between chairs were indicated by the BPD assessment. Conclusion: It is concluded that using a chair with lumbar support, such as the A-chair, will provide greater comfort, less exertion of the ESM and less discomfort than the standard piano stool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86713022021-12-16 High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra Russo, Alessandro D’Emanuele, Samuel Serafino, Francesca Merletti, Roberto Front Physiol Physiology Introduction: At a professional level, pianists have a high prevalence of playing-related musculoskeletal disorders. This exploratory crossover study was carried out to assess and compare quantitatively [using high density surface electromyography (HDsEMG)], and qualitatively (using musculoskeletal questionnaires) the activity of the lumbar erector spinae muscles (ESM) and the comfort/discomfort in 16 pianists sitting on a standard piano stool (SS) and on an alternative chair (A-chair) with lumbar support and a trunk-thigh angle between 105° and 135°. Materials and Methods: The subjects played for 55 min and HDsEMG was recorded for 20 s every 5 min. For the quantitative assessment of the muscle activity, the spatial mean of the root mean square (RMS(ROA)) and the centroid of the region of activity (ROA) of the ESM were compared between the two chairs. For the qualitative assessment, musculoskeletal questionnaire-based scales were used: General Comfort Rating (GCR); Helander and Zhang’s comfort (HZc) and discomfort (HZd); and Body Part Discomfort (BPD). Results: When using the A-chair, 14 out of 16 pianists (87.5%) showed a significantly lower RMS(ROA) on the left and right side (p < 0.05). The mixed effects model revealed that both chairs (F = 28.21, p < 0.001) and sides (F = 204.01, p < 0.001) contributed to the mean RMS(ROA) variation by subject (Z = 2.64, p = 0.004). GCR comfort indicated that participants found the A-Chair to be “quite comfortable,” and the SS to be “uncomfortable.” GCR discomfort indicated that the SS caused more numbness than the A-Chair (p = 0.05) and indicated the A-Chair to cause more feeling of cramps (p = 0.034). No difference was found on HZc (p = 0.091) or HZd (p = 0.31) between chairs. Female participants (n = 9) reported greater comfort when using the A-Chair than the SS (F = 7.09, p = 0.01) with respect to males. No differences between chairs were indicated by the BPD assessment. Conclusion: It is concluded that using a chair with lumbar support, such as the A-chair, will provide greater comfort, less exertion of the ESM and less discomfort than the standard piano stool. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8671302/ /pubmed/34925054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.743730 Text en Copyright © 2021 Aranceta-Garza, Russo, D’Emanuele, Serafino and Merletti. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Aranceta-Garza, Alejandra
Russo, Alessandro
D’Emanuele, Samuel
Serafino, Francesca
Merletti, Roberto
High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title_full High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title_fullStr High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title_full_unstemmed High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title_short High Density Surface Electromyography Activity of the Lumbar Erector Spinae Muscles and Comfort/Discomfort Assessment in Piano Players: Comparison of Two Chairs
title_sort high density surface electromyography activity of the lumbar erector spinae muscles and comfort/discomfort assessment in piano players: comparison of two chairs
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.743730
work_keys_str_mv AT arancetagarzaalejandra highdensitysurfaceelectromyographyactivityofthelumbarerectorspinaemusclesandcomfortdiscomfortassessmentinpianoplayerscomparisonoftwochairs
AT russoalessandro highdensitysurfaceelectromyographyactivityofthelumbarerectorspinaemusclesandcomfortdiscomfortassessmentinpianoplayerscomparisonoftwochairs
AT demanuelesamuel highdensitysurfaceelectromyographyactivityofthelumbarerectorspinaemusclesandcomfortdiscomfortassessmentinpianoplayerscomparisonoftwochairs
AT serafinofrancesca highdensitysurfaceelectromyographyactivityofthelumbarerectorspinaemusclesandcomfortdiscomfortassessmentinpianoplayerscomparisonoftwochairs
AT merlettiroberto highdensitysurfaceelectromyographyactivityofthelumbarerectorspinaemusclesandcomfortdiscomfortassessmentinpianoplayerscomparisonoftwochairs