Cargando…

Interaction Between Macrophage Extracellular Traps and Colon Cancer Cells Promotes Colon Cancer Invasion and Correlates With Unfavorable Prognosis

BACKGROUND: Macrophage extracellular traps (METs) and tumor-infiltrating macrophages contribute to the progression of several diseases. But the role of METs and tumor-infiltrating macrophages in colon cancer (CC) has not been illuminated. In this study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic value of ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tianli, Wang, Yue, Nan, Zhaodi, Wu, Jie, Li, Ailu, Zhang, Tingguo, Qu, Xun, Li, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925357
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.779325
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Macrophage extracellular traps (METs) and tumor-infiltrating macrophages contribute to the progression of several diseases. But the role of METs and tumor-infiltrating macrophages in colon cancer (CC) has not been illuminated. In this study, we aimed to clarify the prognostic value of METs for CC patients and to explore the interaction between CC cells and METs in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: A training cohort consisting of 116 patients and a validation cohort of 94 patients were enrolled in this study. Immunofluorescence (IF) staining was conducted to determine METs formation in CC patients. Cox regression was used to perform prognostic analysis and screen out the best prognostic model. A nomogram was established to predict 5-year overall survival (OS). The correlation between METs with clinicopathological features and inflammatory markers was analyzed. The formation of METs in vitro was detected by SYTOX(®) green and IF staining, and the effect of METs on CC cells was detected by transwell assays. PAD2-IN-1, a selective inhibitor of peptidylarginine deiminase 2 (PAD2), was introduced to destroy the crosstalk between CC cells and METs in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: METs levels were higher in CC tissues and were an independent prognostic factor for CC patients. The prognostic model consisting of age, tumors local invasion, lymph node metastasis and METs were confirmed to be consistent and accurate for predicting the 5-year OS of CC patients. Besides, METs were correlated with distant metastasis and inflammation. Through in vitro experiments, we confirmed that there was a positive feedback loop between CC cells and METs, in that METs promoted the invasion of CC cells and CC cells enhanced the production of METs, in turn. This interaction could be blocked by PAD2-IN-1 inhibitors. More importantly, animal experiments revealed that PAD2-IN-1 inhibited METs formation and CC liver metastasis in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: METs were the potential biomarker of CC patient prognosis. PAD2-IN-1 inhibited the crosstalk between CC cells and METs in vitro and in vivo, which should be emphasized in CC therapy.