Cargando…

Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare two radiomic models in predicting the progression of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and the speed of progression from conventional magnetic resonance images. Methods: In this study, 232 people were retrospectively analyzed at Medical Center A (trainin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shao, Yuan, Ruan, Jingru, Xu, Yuyun, Shu, Zhenyu, He, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924990
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.789295
_version_ 1784615173267390464
author Shao, Yuan
Ruan, Jingru
Xu, Yuyun
Shu, Zhenyu
He, Xiaodong
author_facet Shao, Yuan
Ruan, Jingru
Xu, Yuyun
Shu, Zhenyu
He, Xiaodong
author_sort Shao, Yuan
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare two radiomic models in predicting the progression of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and the speed of progression from conventional magnetic resonance images. Methods: In this study, 232 people were retrospectively analyzed at Medical Center A (training and testing groups) and Medical Center B (external validation group). A visual rating scale was used to divide all patients into WMH progression and non-progression groups. Two regions of interest (ROIs)—ROI whole-brain white matter (WBWM) and ROI WMH penumbra (WMHp)—were segmented from the baseline image. For predicting WMH progression, logistic regression was applied to create radiomic models in the two ROIs. Then, age, sex, clinical course, vascular risk factors, and imaging factors were incorporated into a stepwise regression analysis to construct the combined diagnosis model. Finally, the presence of a correlation between radiomic findings and the speed of progression was analyzed. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) was higher for the WMHp-based radiomic model than the WBWM-based radiomic model in training, testing, and validation groups (0.791, 0.768, and 0.767 vs. 0.725, 0.693, and 0.691, respectively). The WBWM-based combined model was established by combining age, hypertension, and rad-score of the ROI WBWM. Also, the WMHp-based combined model is built by combining the age and rad-score of the ROI WMHp. Compared with the WBWM-based model (AUC = 0.779, 0.716, 0.673 in training, testing, and validation groups, respectively), the WMHp-based combined model has higher diagnostic efficiency and better generalization ability (AUC = 0.793, 0.774, 0.777 in training, testing, and validation groups, respectively). The speed of WMH progression was related to the rad-score from ROI WMHp (r = 0.49) but not from ROI WBWM. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of the penumbra could help identify the individuals at high risk of WMH progression and the rad-score of it was correlated with the speed of progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86716092021-12-16 Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities Shao, Yuan Ruan, Jingru Xu, Yuyun Shu, Zhenyu He, Xiaodong Front Neuroinform Neuroinformatics Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare two radiomic models in predicting the progression of white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and the speed of progression from conventional magnetic resonance images. Methods: In this study, 232 people were retrospectively analyzed at Medical Center A (training and testing groups) and Medical Center B (external validation group). A visual rating scale was used to divide all patients into WMH progression and non-progression groups. Two regions of interest (ROIs)—ROI whole-brain white matter (WBWM) and ROI WMH penumbra (WMHp)—were segmented from the baseline image. For predicting WMH progression, logistic regression was applied to create radiomic models in the two ROIs. Then, age, sex, clinical course, vascular risk factors, and imaging factors were incorporated into a stepwise regression analysis to construct the combined diagnosis model. Finally, the presence of a correlation between radiomic findings and the speed of progression was analyzed. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) was higher for the WMHp-based radiomic model than the WBWM-based radiomic model in training, testing, and validation groups (0.791, 0.768, and 0.767 vs. 0.725, 0.693, and 0.691, respectively). The WBWM-based combined model was established by combining age, hypertension, and rad-score of the ROI WBWM. Also, the WMHp-based combined model is built by combining the age and rad-score of the ROI WMHp. Compared with the WBWM-based model (AUC = 0.779, 0.716, 0.673 in training, testing, and validation groups, respectively), the WMHp-based combined model has higher diagnostic efficiency and better generalization ability (AUC = 0.793, 0.774, 0.777 in training, testing, and validation groups, respectively). The speed of WMH progression was related to the rad-score from ROI WMHp (r = 0.49) but not from ROI WBWM. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of the penumbra could help identify the individuals at high risk of WMH progression and the rad-score of it was correlated with the speed of progression. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8671609/ /pubmed/34924990 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.789295 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shao, Ruan, Xu, Shu and He. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroinformatics
Shao, Yuan
Ruan, Jingru
Xu, Yuyun
Shu, Zhenyu
He, Xiaodong
Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title_full Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title_fullStr Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title_short Comparing the Performance of Two Radiomic Models to Predict Progression and Progression Speed of White Matter Hyperintensities
title_sort comparing the performance of two radiomic models to predict progression and progression speed of white matter hyperintensities
topic Neuroinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924990
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.789295
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoyuan comparingtheperformanceoftworadiomicmodelstopredictprogressionandprogressionspeedofwhitematterhyperintensities
AT ruanjingru comparingtheperformanceoftworadiomicmodelstopredictprogressionandprogressionspeedofwhitematterhyperintensities
AT xuyuyun comparingtheperformanceoftworadiomicmodelstopredictprogressionandprogressionspeedofwhitematterhyperintensities
AT shuzhenyu comparingtheperformanceoftworadiomicmodelstopredictprogressionandprogressionspeedofwhitematterhyperintensities
AT hexiaodong comparingtheperformanceoftworadiomicmodelstopredictprogressionandprogressionspeedofwhitematterhyperintensities