Cargando…

Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis

Purpose: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Methods: A total of 185 women with early breast cancer undergoing breast-con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Jinling, Yang, Ya, Han, Dan, Zhao, Qian, Liu, Chengxin, Sun, Hongfu, Wang, Zhongtang, Lin, Haiqun, Huang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211064719
_version_ 1784615185287217152
author Dong, Jinling
Yang, Ya
Han, Dan
Zhao, Qian
Liu, Chengxin
Sun, Hongfu
Wang, Zhongtang
Lin, Haiqun
Huang, Wei
author_facet Dong, Jinling
Yang, Ya
Han, Dan
Zhao, Qian
Liu, Chengxin
Sun, Hongfu
Wang, Zhongtang
Lin, Haiqun
Huang, Wei
author_sort Dong, Jinling
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Methods: A total of 185 women with early breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery were retrospectively divided into hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group and conventional fractionation group. Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost included 104 patients and the dose of whole-breast radiation reached 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions and simultaneously tumor bed boost to 48 Gy in 16 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 22 days. The 81 patients of the conventional fractionation group received whole breast radiation to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by tumor bed boost to 10 Gy in 5 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 40 days. Clinical information including patients’ characteristics, skin toxicity, myelosuppression, radiation pneumonia, and cosmetic effects was recorded to analyze the influence of age, chemotherapy, position, and breast volume on the results of radiotherapy. Results: Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group had no case of recurrence after a median follow-up of 25.6 months (9-47 months)) as compared with 2 after a median follow-up of 33.4 months (25-45 months) in the conventional fractionation group. The 2 groups had similar results in skin toxicity, cosmetic outcomes, and radiation pneumonia. In terms of myelosuppression, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 of myelosuppression in the hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group accounted for 16.7%, 12.3%, and 3.5% as compared with 30.0%, 21.1%, and 12.3% of the conventional fractionation group, respectively (P = .000). Conclusions: HF-SIB RT is a considerable option in patients after breast-conserving surgery with a lower degree of myelosuppression and shorter treatment time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86716642021-12-16 Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis Dong, Jinling Yang, Ya Han, Dan Zhao, Qian Liu, Chengxin Sun, Hongfu Wang, Zhongtang Lin, Haiqun Huang, Wei Technol Cancer Res Treat Original Article Purpose: The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Methods: A total of 185 women with early breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery were retrospectively divided into hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group and conventional fractionation group. Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost included 104 patients and the dose of whole-breast radiation reached 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions and simultaneously tumor bed boost to 48 Gy in 16 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 22 days. The 81 patients of the conventional fractionation group received whole breast radiation to 50 Gy in 25 fractions and followed by tumor bed boost to 10 Gy in 5 fractions, which course of radiotherapy was 40 days. Clinical information including patients’ characteristics, skin toxicity, myelosuppression, radiation pneumonia, and cosmetic effects was recorded to analyze the influence of age, chemotherapy, position, and breast volume on the results of radiotherapy. Results: Hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group had no case of recurrence after a median follow-up of 25.6 months (9-47 months)) as compared with 2 after a median follow-up of 33.4 months (25-45 months) in the conventional fractionation group. The 2 groups had similar results in skin toxicity, cosmetic outcomes, and radiation pneumonia. In terms of myelosuppression, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 of myelosuppression in the hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost group accounted for 16.7%, 12.3%, and 3.5% as compared with 30.0%, 21.1%, and 12.3% of the conventional fractionation group, respectively (P = .000). Conclusions: HF-SIB RT is a considerable option in patients after breast-conserving surgery with a lower degree of myelosuppression and shorter treatment time. SAGE Publications 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8671664/ /pubmed/34898315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211064719 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Dong, Jinling
Yang, Ya
Han, Dan
Zhao, Qian
Liu, Chengxin
Sun, Hongfu
Wang, Zhongtang
Lin, Haiqun
Huang, Wei
Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title_full Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title_fullStr Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title_short Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy of Early Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Clinical Observation and Analysis
title_sort hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy versus conventional fractionation radiotherapy of early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery: clinical observation and analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338211064719
work_keys_str_mv AT dongjinling hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT yangya hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT handan hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT zhaoqian hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT liuchengxin hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT sunhongfu hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT wangzhongtang hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT linhaiqun hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis
AT huangwei hypofractionatedsimultaneousintegratedboostradiotherapyversusconventionalfractionationradiotherapyofearlybreastcancerafterbreastconservingsurgeryclinicalobservationandanalysis