Cargando…

miR-145-5p: A Potential Biomarker in Predicting Gleason Upgrading of Prostate Biopsy Samples Scored 3+3=6

BACKGROUND: The Gleason grading system is a major tool used for prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) behavior. Because of heterogeneity and sampling errors, prognosis is variable even among patients with the same Gleason score (GS). Therefore, more accurate biomarkers that complement the Gleason syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Wang, Tao, Dong, Lei, Sun, Juanjuan, Shao, Jialiang, Zhang, Jian, Chen, Siteng, Wang, Chaofu, Wu, Gangfeng, Wang, Xiang
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dove 2021
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916852 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S336671

Ejemplares similares

Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
por: Moon, Seung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

pT3 Predictive Factors in Patients with a Gleason Score of 6 in Prostate Biopsies
por: Kim, Sung Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Prediction of prostate cancer Gleason score upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI PIRADS scoring system
por: Alqahtani, Saeed, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi‐institutional analysis
por: Barsky, Andrew R., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Erratum: pT3 Predictive Factors in Patients with a Gleason Score of 6 in Prostate Biopsies
Publicado: (2011)

The values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and/or prostate-specific antigen in discriminating real Gleason score ≥ 7 prostate cancer from group of biopsy-based Gleason score ≤ 6
por: Wang, Hanfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer with biopsy Gleason score of 6
por: Oh, Jong Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Importance and determinants of Gleason score undergrading on biopsy sample of prostate cancer in a population-based study
por: Rapiti, Elisabetta, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
por: Pham, Duc Minh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Does the Time From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Clinical T1c Prostate Cancer?
por: Eroglu, Muzaffer, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
por: Reis, Leonardo Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
por: Chung, Mun Su, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

CRMP4 CpG Hypermethylation Predicts Upgrading to Gleason Score ≥ 8 in Prostate Cancer
por: Qin, Xiao-Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Wenzel, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Significance of Nuclear Factor - Kappa Beta Activation on Prostate Needle Biopsy Samples in the Evaluation of Gleason Score 6 Prostatic Carcinoma Indolence
por: Zupancic, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Kayano, Paulo Priante, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The correlation between the gleason score of the biopsy and that of the prostatectomy patch
por: Bai, W., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Upgrading of Gleason score on radical prostatectomy specimen compared to the pre-operative needle core biopsy: An Indian experience
por: Nayyar, Rishi, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Can Contemporary Patients with Biopsy Gleason Score 3+4 Be Eligible for Active Surveillance?
por: Kwon, Ohseong, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low‐risk prostate cancer on active surveillance
por: Tomer, Anirudh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
por: Promsen, Worapong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Re: Comparison of Gleason upgrading rates in transrectal ultrasound systematic random biopsies versus US-MRI fusion biopsies for prostate cancer
por: Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
por: Hu, Xuanhan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correlation between body mass index (BMI) and the Gleason score of prostate biopsies in Chinese population
por: Zhou, Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prostate-specific antigen 10–20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6
por: Santok, Glen Denmer R., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
por: Tohi, Yoichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
por: Novak, Vojtech, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Kim, Hwanik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Role of inflammatory factors in prediction of Gleason score and its upgrading in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
por: Wang, Shuo, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
por: Milonas, Daimantas, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
por: Press, Benjamin H., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Does prostate acinar adenocarcinoma with Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 have the potential to metastasize?
por: Montironi, Rodolfo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy Enables Gleason Scoring of Prostate Core Needle Biopsy by a Convolutional Neural Network
por: Ao, Jianpeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of “regression to the mean” using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates
por: Altok, Muammer, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction model of gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy based on a bayesian network
por: Wang, Guipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
por: Park, Juhyun, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prostate Cancer in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated with Low Grade Gleason Score When Diagnosed on Biopsy
por: Jeon, Kyoung Pil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Prostate cancer: Relationship between vascular diameter, shape and density and Gleason score in needle biopsy specimens
por: Tadayyon, Farhad, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_74mo4o5hqqfqrinsavcrr8ulu3