Cargando…

Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Over the past decade, numerous gene-editing platforms which alter host DNA in a highly specific and targeted fashion have been described. Two notable examples are zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), the first gene-editing platform to be tested in clinical trials, and more recently, CRISPR/Cas9. Although C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peterson, Christopher W., Venkataraman, Rasika, Reddy, Sowmya S., Pande, Dnyanada, Enstrom, Mark R., Radtke, Stefan, Humbert, Olivier, Kiem, Hans-Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.11.010
_version_ 1784615201588379648
author Peterson, Christopher W.
Venkataraman, Rasika
Reddy, Sowmya S.
Pande, Dnyanada
Enstrom, Mark R.
Radtke, Stefan
Humbert, Olivier
Kiem, Hans-Peter
author_facet Peterson, Christopher W.
Venkataraman, Rasika
Reddy, Sowmya S.
Pande, Dnyanada
Enstrom, Mark R.
Radtke, Stefan
Humbert, Olivier
Kiem, Hans-Peter
author_sort Peterson, Christopher W.
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade, numerous gene-editing platforms which alter host DNA in a highly specific and targeted fashion have been described. Two notable examples are zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), the first gene-editing platform to be tested in clinical trials, and more recently, CRISPR/Cas9. Although CRISPR/Cas9 approaches have become arguably the most popular platform in the field, the therapeutic advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are only beginning to emerge. We have established a nonhuman primate (NHP) model that serves as a strong predictor of successful gene therapy and gene-editing approaches in humans; our recent work shows that ZFN-edited hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) engraft at lower levels than CRISPR/Cas9-edited cells. Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying this difference. We show that optimized culture conditions, including defined serum-free media, augment engraftment of gene-edited NHP HSPCs in a mouse xenograft model. Furthermore, we identify intracellular RNases as major barriers for mRNA-encoded nucleases relative to preformed enzymatically active CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. We conclude that CRISPR/Cas9 RNP gene editing is more stable and efficient than ZFN mRNA-based delivery and identify co-delivered RNase inhibitors as a strategy to enhance the expression of gene-editing proteins from mRNA intermediates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86717322021-12-30 Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Peterson, Christopher W. Venkataraman, Rasika Reddy, Sowmya S. Pande, Dnyanada Enstrom, Mark R. Radtke, Stefan Humbert, Olivier Kiem, Hans-Peter Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Original Article Over the past decade, numerous gene-editing platforms which alter host DNA in a highly specific and targeted fashion have been described. Two notable examples are zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), the first gene-editing platform to be tested in clinical trials, and more recently, CRISPR/Cas9. Although CRISPR/Cas9 approaches have become arguably the most popular platform in the field, the therapeutic advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are only beginning to emerge. We have established a nonhuman primate (NHP) model that serves as a strong predictor of successful gene therapy and gene-editing approaches in humans; our recent work shows that ZFN-edited hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) engraft at lower levels than CRISPR/Cas9-edited cells. Here, we investigate the mechanisms underlying this difference. We show that optimized culture conditions, including defined serum-free media, augment engraftment of gene-edited NHP HSPCs in a mouse xenograft model. Furthermore, we identify intracellular RNases as major barriers for mRNA-encoded nucleases relative to preformed enzymatically active CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. We conclude that CRISPR/Cas9 RNP gene editing is more stable and efficient than ZFN mRNA-based delivery and identify co-delivered RNase inhibitors as a strategy to enhance the expression of gene-editing proteins from mRNA intermediates. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8671732/ /pubmed/34977270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.11.010 Text en © 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Peterson, Christopher W.
Venkataraman, Rasika
Reddy, Sowmya S.
Pande, Dnyanada
Enstrom, Mark R.
Radtke, Stefan
Humbert, Olivier
Kiem, Hans-Peter
Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title_full Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title_fullStr Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title_full_unstemmed Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title_short Intracellular RNase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
title_sort intracellular rnase activity dampens zinc finger nuclease-mediated gene editing in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34977270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT petersonchristopherw intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT venkataramanrasika intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT reddysowmyas intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT pandednyanada intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT enstrommarkr intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT radtkestefan intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT humbertolivier intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells
AT kiemhanspeter intracellularrnaseactivitydampenszincfingernucleasemediatedgeneeditinginhematopoieticstemandprogenitorcells