Cargando…

Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals

BACKGROUND: Due to its severe negative consequences, human violence has been targeted by a vast number of studies. Yet, neurobiological mechanisms underlying violence are still widely unclear and it seems necessary to aim for high ecological validity to learn about mechanisms contributing to violenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taubner, Svenja, Hauschild, Sophie, Wisniewski, David, Wolter, Silke, Roth, Gerhard, Fehr, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2400
_version_ 1784615215502983168
author Taubner, Svenja
Hauschild, Sophie
Wisniewski, David
Wolter, Silke
Roth, Gerhard
Fehr, Thorsten
author_facet Taubner, Svenja
Hauschild, Sophie
Wisniewski, David
Wolter, Silke
Roth, Gerhard
Fehr, Thorsten
author_sort Taubner, Svenja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to its severe negative consequences, human violence has been targeted by a vast number of studies. Yet, neurobiological mechanisms underlying violence are still widely unclear and it seems necessary to aim for high ecological validity to learn about mechanisms contributing to violence in real life. METHODS: The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the neurofunction of individuals with a history of violent offenses compared with that of controls using a laboratory paradigm requesting individuals to empathically engage in videos depicting provocative aggressive and positive social interactions from a first‐person perspective. RESULTS: The contrast of aggressive vs. positive scenarios revealed midbrain activation patterns associated with caudal periaqueductal gray (PAG) in violent offenders; In controls, the rostral PAG was involved. Additionally, only in controls, this contrast revealed an involvement of the amygdaloidal complex. Moreover, in violent offenders the contrast of positive vs. aggressive situations revealed an involvement of areas in the insula, post‐central gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support findings on the differential role of PAG subdivisions in response to threat and point to altered processing of positive social interactions in violent offenders. They further support the notion that changes in PAG recruitment might contribute to violent individuals “taking action” instead of freezing in case of threatening situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86717902021-12-21 Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals Taubner, Svenja Hauschild, Sophie Wisniewski, David Wolter, Silke Roth, Gerhard Fehr, Thorsten Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Due to its severe negative consequences, human violence has been targeted by a vast number of studies. Yet, neurobiological mechanisms underlying violence are still widely unclear and it seems necessary to aim for high ecological validity to learn about mechanisms contributing to violence in real life. METHODS: The present functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study investigated the neurofunction of individuals with a history of violent offenses compared with that of controls using a laboratory paradigm requesting individuals to empathically engage in videos depicting provocative aggressive and positive social interactions from a first‐person perspective. RESULTS: The contrast of aggressive vs. positive scenarios revealed midbrain activation patterns associated with caudal periaqueductal gray (PAG) in violent offenders; In controls, the rostral PAG was involved. Additionally, only in controls, this contrast revealed an involvement of the amygdaloidal complex. Moreover, in violent offenders the contrast of positive vs. aggressive situations revealed an involvement of areas in the insula, post‐central gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support findings on the differential role of PAG subdivisions in response to threat and point to altered processing of positive social interactions in violent offenders. They further support the notion that changes in PAG recruitment might contribute to violent individuals “taking action” instead of freezing in case of threatening situations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8671790/ /pubmed/34758197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2400 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Taubner, Svenja
Hauschild, Sophie
Wisniewski, David
Wolter, Silke
Roth, Gerhard
Fehr, Thorsten
Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title_full Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title_fullStr Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title_full_unstemmed Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title_short Neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
title_sort neural response to aggressive and positive interactions in violent offenders and nonviolent individuals
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2400
work_keys_str_mv AT taubnersvenja neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals
AT hauschildsophie neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals
AT wisniewskidavid neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals
AT woltersilke neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals
AT rothgerhard neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals
AT fehrthorsten neuralresponsetoaggressiveandpositiveinteractionsinviolentoffendersandnonviolentindividuals