Cargando…
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: People with psychosis tend to have smaller social networks than both people in the general population and other people with long-term health conditions. Small social networks are associated with poor quality of life. Preliminary evidence suggests that coaching patients to increase thei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050627 |
_version_ | 1784615263208996864 |
---|---|
author | Giacco, Domenico Chevalier, Agnes Patterson, Megan Hamborg, Thomas Mortimer, Rianna Feng, Yan Webber, Martin Xanthopoulou, Penny Priebe, Stefan |
author_facet | Giacco, Domenico Chevalier, Agnes Patterson, Megan Hamborg, Thomas Mortimer, Rianna Feng, Yan Webber, Martin Xanthopoulou, Penny Priebe, Stefan |
author_sort | Giacco, Domenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: People with psychosis tend to have smaller social networks than both people in the general population and other people with long-term health conditions. Small social networks are associated with poor quality of life. Preliminary evidence suggests that coaching patients to increase their social contacts may be effective. In this study, we assessed whether structured social coaching improves the quality of life of patients with psychosis (primary outcome) compared with an active control group, receiving information on local social activities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A structured social coaching intervention was developed based on the literature and refined through stakeholder involvement. It draws on principles from motivational interviewing, solution focused therapy and structured information giving. It is provided over a 6-month period and can be delivered by a range of different mental health professionals. Its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are assessed in a randomised controlled trial, compared with an active control group, in which participants are given an information booklet on local social activities. Participants are aged 18 or over, have a primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (International Classification of Disease: F20–29) and capacity to provide informed consent. Participants are assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after individual randomisation. The primary outcome is quality of life at 6 months (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life). We hypothesise that the effects on quality of life are mediated by an increase in social contacts. Secondary outcomes are symptoms, social situation and time spent in social activities. Costs and cost-effectiveness analyses will consider service use and health-related quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service REC London Hampstead (19/LO/0088) provided a favourable opinion. Findings will be disseminated through a website, social media, scientific papers and user-friendly reports, in collaboration with a lived experience advisory panel. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15815862. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8671980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86719802021-12-28 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial Giacco, Domenico Chevalier, Agnes Patterson, Megan Hamborg, Thomas Mortimer, Rianna Feng, Yan Webber, Martin Xanthopoulou, Penny Priebe, Stefan BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: People with psychosis tend to have smaller social networks than both people in the general population and other people with long-term health conditions. Small social networks are associated with poor quality of life. Preliminary evidence suggests that coaching patients to increase their social contacts may be effective. In this study, we assessed whether structured social coaching improves the quality of life of patients with psychosis (primary outcome) compared with an active control group, receiving information on local social activities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A structured social coaching intervention was developed based on the literature and refined through stakeholder involvement. It draws on principles from motivational interviewing, solution focused therapy and structured information giving. It is provided over a 6-month period and can be delivered by a range of different mental health professionals. Its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are assessed in a randomised controlled trial, compared with an active control group, in which participants are given an information booklet on local social activities. Participants are aged 18 or over, have a primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (International Classification of Disease: F20–29) and capacity to provide informed consent. Participants are assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after individual randomisation. The primary outcome is quality of life at 6 months (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life). We hypothesise that the effects on quality of life are mediated by an increase in social contacts. Secondary outcomes are symptoms, social situation and time spent in social activities. Costs and cost-effectiveness analyses will consider service use and health-related quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: National Health Service REC London Hampstead (19/LO/0088) provided a favourable opinion. Findings will be disseminated through a website, social media, scientific papers and user-friendly reports, in collaboration with a lived experience advisory panel. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15815862. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8671980/ /pubmed/34903539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050627 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Giacco, Domenico Chevalier, Agnes Patterson, Megan Hamborg, Thomas Mortimer, Rianna Feng, Yan Webber, Martin Xanthopoulou, Penny Priebe, Stefan Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (scene): protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giaccodomenico effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chevalieragnes effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pattersonmegan effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hamborgthomas effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mortimerrianna effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fengyan effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT webbermartin effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT xanthopouloupenny effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT priebestefan effectivenessandcosteffectivenessofastructuredsocialcoachinginterventionforpeoplewithpsychosissceneprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |