Cargando…

The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of Ethanol Wet Bonding Technique (EWBT) on postoperative hypersensitivity (POH) of composite restorations in premolar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized trial, 24 patients with at least three proximal carious lesions with similar axial depth and posit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boruziniat, Alireza, Alizadeh, Sanaz, Gifani, Mahshid, Cehreli, Zafer C., Khazaei, Yeganeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003562
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.330878
_version_ 1784615294375821312
author Boruziniat, Alireza
Alizadeh, Sanaz
Gifani, Mahshid
Cehreli, Zafer C.
Khazaei, Yeganeh
author_facet Boruziniat, Alireza
Alizadeh, Sanaz
Gifani, Mahshid
Cehreli, Zafer C.
Khazaei, Yeganeh
author_sort Boruziniat, Alireza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of Ethanol Wet Bonding Technique (EWBT) on postoperative hypersensitivity (POH) of composite restorations in premolar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized trial, 24 patients with at least three proximal carious lesions with similar axial depth and position of gingival floor in their premolars were enrolled. Following cavity preparation, the teeth were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restoration using an etch-and-rinse adhesive + wet bonding technique (Control); (2) RBC restoration using EWBT + hydrophobic adhesive; and (3) RBC restoration using EWBT + hydrophilic adhesive. Tooth hypersensitivity was evaluated before and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days after treatment according to the Visual Analog Scale. Data were analyzed statistically with Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman tests (P = 0.05). RESULTS: All teeth showed similar levels of hypersensitivity after treatment (both P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no difference between POH levels of the test and control groups at any control period (P < 0.05). Friedman test indicated that the POH significantly reduced within time in all groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of ethanol-wet bonding technique, either with hydrophobic or hydrophilic adhesives did not affect the POH of Class II composite restorations in premolars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8672124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86721242022-01-06 The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial Boruziniat, Alireza Alizadeh, Sanaz Gifani, Mahshid Cehreli, Zafer C. Khazaei, Yeganeh Dent Res J (Isfahan) Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of Ethanol Wet Bonding Technique (EWBT) on postoperative hypersensitivity (POH) of composite restorations in premolar teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized trial, 24 patients with at least three proximal carious lesions with similar axial depth and position of gingival floor in their premolars were enrolled. Following cavity preparation, the teeth were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Class II resin-based composite (RBC) restoration using an etch-and-rinse adhesive + wet bonding technique (Control); (2) RBC restoration using EWBT + hydrophobic adhesive; and (3) RBC restoration using EWBT + hydrophilic adhesive. Tooth hypersensitivity was evaluated before and 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30 days after treatment according to the Visual Analog Scale. Data were analyzed statistically with Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman tests (P = 0.05). RESULTS: All teeth showed similar levels of hypersensitivity after treatment (both P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no difference between POH levels of the test and control groups at any control period (P < 0.05). Friedman test indicated that the POH significantly reduced within time in all groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Application of ethanol-wet bonding technique, either with hydrophobic or hydrophilic adhesives did not affect the POH of Class II composite restorations in premolars. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8672124/ /pubmed/35003562 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.330878 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Dental Research Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trial
Boruziniat, Alireza
Alizadeh, Sanaz
Gifani, Mahshid
Cehreli, Zafer C.
Khazaei, Yeganeh
The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title_full The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title_fullStr The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title_short The effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of Class II composite restorations: A randomized trial
title_sort effect of ethanol wet bonding technique on postoperative hypersensitivity of class ii composite restorations: a randomized trial
topic Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003562
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.330878
work_keys_str_mv AT boruziniatalireza theeffectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT alizadehsanaz theeffectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT gifanimahshid theeffectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT cehrelizaferc theeffectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT khazaeiyeganeh theeffectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT boruziniatalireza effectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT alizadehsanaz effectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT gifanimahshid effectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT cehrelizaferc effectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial
AT khazaeiyeganeh effectofethanolwetbondingtechniqueonpostoperativehypersensitivityofclassiicompositerestorationsarandomizedtrial