Cargando…
Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and in...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386 |
_version_ | 1784615299543203840 |
---|---|
author | Boyd, A.E. |
author_facet | Boyd, A.E. |
author_sort | Boyd, A.E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and inequities, alter our approaches from the standard perfunctory tasks, reflect how we aid and abide by systems and structures of power, and begin to break the habit of recolonizing ourselves as data scientists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8672146 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86721462021-12-22 Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process Boyd, A.E. Patterns (N Y) Opinion Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and inequities, alter our approaches from the standard perfunctory tasks, reflect how we aid and abide by systems and structures of power, and begin to break the habit of recolonizing ourselves as data scientists. Elsevier 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8672146/ /pubmed/34950906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386 Text en © 2021 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Opinion Boyd, A.E. Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title | Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title_full | Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title_fullStr | Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title_full_unstemmed | Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title_short | Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
title_sort | intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process |
topic | Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672146/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boydae intersectionalityandreflexivitydecolonizingmethodologiesforthedatascienceprocess |