Cargando…

Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process

Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Boyd, A.E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386
_version_ 1784615299543203840
author Boyd, A.E.
author_facet Boyd, A.E.
author_sort Boyd, A.E.
collection PubMed
description Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and inequities, alter our approaches from the standard perfunctory tasks, reflect how we aid and abide by systems and structures of power, and begin to break the habit of recolonizing ourselves as data scientists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8672146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86721462021-12-22 Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process Boyd, A.E. Patterns (N Y) Opinion Using intersectionality as a methodology illuminated the shortcomings of the data science process when analyzing the viral #metoo movement and simultaneously allowed me to reflect on my role in that process. The key is to implement intersectionality to its fullest potential, to expose nuances and inequities, alter our approaches from the standard perfunctory tasks, reflect how we aid and abide by systems and structures of power, and begin to break the habit of recolonizing ourselves as data scientists. Elsevier 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8672146/ /pubmed/34950906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386 Text en © 2021 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Boyd, A.E.
Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title_full Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title_fullStr Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title_full_unstemmed Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title_short Intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
title_sort intersectionality and reflexivity—decolonizing methodologies for the data science process
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100386
work_keys_str_mv AT boydae intersectionalityandreflexivitydecolonizingmethodologiesforthedatascienceprocess