Cargando…

Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is an alternative to complete autopsy for determining causes of death. Multiplex molecular testing performed on MITS specimens poses challenges of interpretation, due to high sensitivity and indiscriminate detection of pathogenic, commensal, or c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritter, Jana M, Seixas, Josilene N, Walong, Edwin, Dawa, Jeanette, Onyango, Clayton, Pimenta, Fabiana C, da Gloria Carvalho, Maria, Silva-Flannery, Luciana, Jenkinson, Tiffany, Howard, Katie, Bhatnagar, Julu, Diaz, Maureen, Winchell, Jonas M, Zaki, Sherif R, Chaves, Sandra S, Martines, Roosecelis B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab772
_version_ 1784615414752346112
author Ritter, Jana M
Seixas, Josilene N
Walong, Edwin
Dawa, Jeanette
Onyango, Clayton
Pimenta, Fabiana C
da Gloria Carvalho, Maria
Silva-Flannery, Luciana
Jenkinson, Tiffany
Howard, Katie
Bhatnagar, Julu
Diaz, Maureen
Winchell, Jonas M
Zaki, Sherif R
Chaves, Sandra S
Martines, Roosecelis B
author_facet Ritter, Jana M
Seixas, Josilene N
Walong, Edwin
Dawa, Jeanette
Onyango, Clayton
Pimenta, Fabiana C
da Gloria Carvalho, Maria
Silva-Flannery, Luciana
Jenkinson, Tiffany
Howard, Katie
Bhatnagar, Julu
Diaz, Maureen
Winchell, Jonas M
Zaki, Sherif R
Chaves, Sandra S
Martines, Roosecelis B
author_sort Ritter, Jana M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is an alternative to complete autopsy for determining causes of death. Multiplex molecular testing performed on MITS specimens poses challenges of interpretation, due to high sensitivity and indiscriminate detection of pathogenic, commensal, or contaminating microorganisms. METHODS: MITS was performed on 20 deceased children with respiratory illness, at 10 timepoints up to 88 hours postmortem. Samples were evaluated by multiplex molecular testing on fresh tissues by TaqMan® Array Card (TAC) and by histopathology, special stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and molecular testing (PCR) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Results were correlated to determine overall pathologic and etiologic diagnoses and to guide interpretation of TAC results. RESULTS: MITS specimens collected up to 3 days postmortem were adequate for histopathologic evaluation and testing. Seven different etiologic agents were detected by TAC in 10 cases. Three cases had etiologic agents detected by FFPE or other methods and not TAC; 2 were agents not present on TAC, and 2 were streptococci that may have been species other than those present on TAC. Result agreement was 43% for TAC and IHC or PCR, and 69% for IHC and PCR. Extraneous TAC results were common, especially when aspiration was present. CONCLUSIONS: TAC can be performed on MITS up to 3 days after death with refrigeration and provides a sensitive method for detection of pathogens but requires careful interpretation in the context of clinicoepidemiologic and histopathologic findings. Interpretation of all diagnostic tests in aggregate to establish overall case diagnoses maximizes the utility of TAC in MITS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8672755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86727552021-12-16 Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples Ritter, Jana M Seixas, Josilene N Walong, Edwin Dawa, Jeanette Onyango, Clayton Pimenta, Fabiana C da Gloria Carvalho, Maria Silva-Flannery, Luciana Jenkinson, Tiffany Howard, Katie Bhatnagar, Julu Diaz, Maureen Winchell, Jonas M Zaki, Sherif R Chaves, Sandra S Martines, Roosecelis B Clin Infect Dis Supplement Articles BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is an alternative to complete autopsy for determining causes of death. Multiplex molecular testing performed on MITS specimens poses challenges of interpretation, due to high sensitivity and indiscriminate detection of pathogenic, commensal, or contaminating microorganisms. METHODS: MITS was performed on 20 deceased children with respiratory illness, at 10 timepoints up to 88 hours postmortem. Samples were evaluated by multiplex molecular testing on fresh tissues by TaqMan® Array Card (TAC) and by histopathology, special stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and molecular testing (PCR) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Results were correlated to determine overall pathologic and etiologic diagnoses and to guide interpretation of TAC results. RESULTS: MITS specimens collected up to 3 days postmortem were adequate for histopathologic evaluation and testing. Seven different etiologic agents were detected by TAC in 10 cases. Three cases had etiologic agents detected by FFPE or other methods and not TAC; 2 were agents not present on TAC, and 2 were streptococci that may have been species other than those present on TAC. Result agreement was 43% for TAC and IHC or PCR, and 69% for IHC and PCR. Extraneous TAC results were common, especially when aspiration was present. CONCLUSIONS: TAC can be performed on MITS up to 3 days after death with refrigeration and provides a sensitive method for detection of pathogens but requires careful interpretation in the context of clinicoepidemiologic and histopathologic findings. Interpretation of all diagnostic tests in aggregate to establish overall case diagnoses maximizes the utility of TAC in MITS. Oxford University Press 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8672755/ /pubmed/34910182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab772 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Ritter, Jana M
Seixas, Josilene N
Walong, Edwin
Dawa, Jeanette
Onyango, Clayton
Pimenta, Fabiana C
da Gloria Carvalho, Maria
Silva-Flannery, Luciana
Jenkinson, Tiffany
Howard, Katie
Bhatnagar, Julu
Diaz, Maureen
Winchell, Jonas M
Zaki, Sherif R
Chaves, Sandra S
Martines, Roosecelis B
Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title_full Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title_fullStr Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title_full_unstemmed Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title_short Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples
title_sort histopathology is key to interpreting multiplex molecular test results from postmortem minimally invasive tissue samples
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8672755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab772
work_keys_str_mv AT ritterjanam histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT seixasjosilenen histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT walongedwin histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT dawajeanette histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT onyangoclayton histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT pimentafabianac histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT dagloriacarvalhomaria histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT silvaflanneryluciana histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT jenkinsontiffany histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT howardkatie histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT bhatnagarjulu histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT diazmaureen histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT winchelljonasm histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT zakisherifr histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT chavessandras histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples
AT martinesroosecelisb histopathologyiskeytointerpretingmultiplexmoleculartestresultsfrompostmortemminimallyinvasivetissuesamples