Cargando…

Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data

Careful quantitative analysis of histological preparations of muscle samples is crucial to accurate investigation of myopathies in man and of interpretation of data from animals subjected to experimental or potentially therapeutic treatments. Protocols for measuring cell numbers are subject to probl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Partridge, Terence A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8673506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-210736
_version_ 1784615465518104576
author Partridge, Terence A.
author_facet Partridge, Terence A.
author_sort Partridge, Terence A.
collection PubMed
description Careful quantitative analysis of histological preparations of muscle samples is crucial to accurate investigation of myopathies in man and of interpretation of data from animals subjected to experimental or potentially therapeutic treatments. Protocols for measuring cell numbers are subject to problems arising from biases associated with preparative and analytical techniques. Prominent among these is the effect of polarized structure of skeletal muscle on sampling bias. It is also common in this tissue to collect data as ratios to convenient reference dominators, the fundamental bases of which are ill-defined, or unrecognized or not accurately assessable. Use of such ‘floating’ denominators raises a barrier to estimation of the absolute values that assume practical importance in medical research, where accurate comparison between different scenarios in different species is essential to the aim of translating preclinical research findings in animal models to clinical utility in Homo sapiens. This review identifies some of the underappreciated problems with current morphometric practice, some of which are exacerbated in skeletal muscle, and evaluates the extent of their intrusiveness into the of building an objective, accurate, picture of the structure of the muscle sample. It also contains recommendations for eliminating or at least minimizing these problems. Principal among these, would be the use of stereological procedures to avoid the substantial counting biases arising from inter-procedure differences in object size and section thickness. Attention is also drawn to the distortions of interpretation arising from use of undefined or inappropriate denominators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8673506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86735062021-12-29 Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data Partridge, Terence A. J Neuromuscul Dis Review Careful quantitative analysis of histological preparations of muscle samples is crucial to accurate investigation of myopathies in man and of interpretation of data from animals subjected to experimental or potentially therapeutic treatments. Protocols for measuring cell numbers are subject to problems arising from biases associated with preparative and analytical techniques. Prominent among these is the effect of polarized structure of skeletal muscle on sampling bias. It is also common in this tissue to collect data as ratios to convenient reference dominators, the fundamental bases of which are ill-defined, or unrecognized or not accurately assessable. Use of such ‘floating’ denominators raises a barrier to estimation of the absolute values that assume practical importance in medical research, where accurate comparison between different scenarios in different species is essential to the aim of translating preclinical research findings in animal models to clinical utility in Homo sapiens. This review identifies some of the underappreciated problems with current morphometric practice, some of which are exacerbated in skeletal muscle, and evaluates the extent of their intrusiveness into the of building an objective, accurate, picture of the structure of the muscle sample. It also contains recommendations for eliminating or at least minimizing these problems. Principal among these, would be the use of stereological procedures to avoid the substantial counting biases arising from inter-procedure differences in object size and section thickness. Attention is also drawn to the distortions of interpretation arising from use of undefined or inappropriate denominators. IOS Press 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8673506/ /pubmed/34511511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-210736 Text en © 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Partridge, Terence A.
Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title_full Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title_fullStr Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title_short Enhancing Interrogation of Skeletal Muscle Samples for Informative Quantitative Data
title_sort enhancing interrogation of skeletal muscle samples for informative quantitative data
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8673506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511511
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JND-210736
work_keys_str_mv AT partridgeterencea enhancinginterrogationofskeletalmusclesamplesforinformativequantitativedata