Cargando…

Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering

According to influential accounts of mind wandering (MW), working memory capacity (WMC) plays a key role in controlling the amount of off-task thought during the execution of a demanding task. Whereas WMC has primarily been associated with reduced levels of involuntarily occurring MW episodes in pri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soemer, Alexander, Schiefele, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32333324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4
_version_ 1784615588497195008
author Soemer, Alexander
Schiefele, Ulrich
author_facet Soemer, Alexander
Schiefele, Ulrich
author_sort Soemer, Alexander
collection PubMed
description According to influential accounts of mind wandering (MW), working memory capacity (WMC) plays a key role in controlling the amount of off-task thought during the execution of a demanding task. Whereas WMC has primarily been associated with reduced levels of involuntarily occurring MW episodes in prior research, here we demonstrate for the first time that high-WMC individuals exhibit lower levels of voluntary MW. One hundred and eighty participants carried out a demanding reading task and reported their attentional state in response to random thought probes. In addition, participants’ WMC was measured with two common complex span tasks (operation span and symmetry span). As a result, WMC was negatively related to both voluntary and involuntary MW, and the two forms of MW partially mediated the positive effect of WMC on reading performance. Furthermore, the negative relation between voluntary WM and reading remained significant after controlling for interest. Thus, in contrast to prior research suggesting that voluntary MW might be more closely related to motivation rather than WMC, the present results demonstrate that high-WMC individuals tend to limit both involuntary and voluntary MW more strictly than low-WMC individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8674160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86741602021-12-28 Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering Soemer, Alexander Schiefele, Ulrich Psychon Bull Rev Brief Report According to influential accounts of mind wandering (MW), working memory capacity (WMC) plays a key role in controlling the amount of off-task thought during the execution of a demanding task. Whereas WMC has primarily been associated with reduced levels of involuntarily occurring MW episodes in prior research, here we demonstrate for the first time that high-WMC individuals exhibit lower levels of voluntary MW. One hundred and eighty participants carried out a demanding reading task and reported their attentional state in response to random thought probes. In addition, participants’ WMC was measured with two common complex span tasks (operation span and symmetry span). As a result, WMC was negatively related to both voluntary and involuntary MW, and the two forms of MW partially mediated the positive effect of WMC on reading performance. Furthermore, the negative relation between voluntary WM and reading remained significant after controlling for interest. Thus, in contrast to prior research suggesting that voluntary MW might be more closely related to motivation rather than WMC, the present results demonstrate that high-WMC individuals tend to limit both involuntary and voluntary MW more strictly than low-WMC individuals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-04-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8674160/ /pubmed/32333324 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4 Text en © The Authors 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Soemer, Alexander
Schiefele, Ulrich
Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title_full Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title_fullStr Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title_full_unstemmed Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title_short Working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
title_sort working memory capacity and (in)voluntary mind wandering
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32333324
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01737-4
work_keys_str_mv AT soemeralexander workingmemorycapacityandinvoluntarymindwandering
AT schiefeleulrich workingmemorycapacityandinvoluntarymindwandering