Cargando…

Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study

BACKGROUND: In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziemann, S., Coburn, M., Rossaint, R., Van Waesberghe, J., Bürkle, H., Fries, M., Henrich, M., Henzler, D., Iber, T., Karst, J., Kunitz, O., Löb, R., Meißner, W., Meybohm, P., Mierke, B., Pabst, F., Schaelte, G., Schiff, J., Soehle, M., Winterhalter, M., Kowark, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y
_version_ 1784615591956447232
author Ziemann, S.
Coburn, M.
Rossaint, R.
Van Waesberghe, J.
Bürkle, H.
Fries, M.
Henrich, M.
Henzler, D.
Iber, T.
Karst, J.
Kunitz, O.
Löb, R.
Meißner, W.
Meybohm, P.
Mierke, B.
Pabst, F.
Schaelte, G.
Schiff, J.
Soehle, M.
Winterhalter, M.
Kowark, A.
author_facet Ziemann, S.
Coburn, M.
Rossaint, R.
Van Waesberghe, J.
Bürkle, H.
Fries, M.
Henrich, M.
Henzler, D.
Iber, T.
Karst, J.
Kunitz, O.
Löb, R.
Meißner, W.
Meybohm, P.
Mierke, B.
Pabst, F.
Schaelte, G.
Schiff, J.
Soehle, M.
Winterhalter, M.
Kowark, A.
author_sort Ziemann, S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals. OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids (www.qi-an.org) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation. RESULTS: The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources. CONCLUSION: In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8674175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86741752021-12-28 Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study Ziemann, S. Coburn, M. Rossaint, R. Van Waesberghe, J. Bürkle, H. Fries, M. Henrich, M. Henzler, D. Iber, T. Karst, J. Kunitz, O. Löb, R. Meißner, W. Meybohm, P. Mierke, B. Pabst, F. Schaelte, G. Schiff, J. Soehle, M. Winterhalter, M. Kowark, A. Anaesthesist Originalien BACKGROUND: In 2016 the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthetists (BDA) published 10 quality indicators (QI) to compare and improve the quality of anesthesia care in Germany. So far, there is no evidence for the feasibility of implementation of these QI in hospitals. OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that the implementation of the 10 QI is feasible in German hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective three-phase national multicenter quality improvement study was conducted in 15 German hospitals and 1 outpatient anesthesia center from March 2017 to February 2018. The trial consisted of an initial evaluation of pre-existing structures and processes by the heads of the participating anesthesia departments, followed by a 6-month implementation phase of the QI as well as a final re-evaluation phase. The implementation procedure was supported by web-based implementation aids (www.qi-an.org) and internal quality management programs. The primary endpoint was the difference in the number of implemented QI per center before and after implementation. Secondary endpoints were the number of newly implemented QI per center, the overall number of successful implementations of each QI, the identification of problems during the implementation as well as the kind of impediments preventing the QI implementation. RESULTS: The average number of implemented QI increased from 5.8 to 6.8 (mean of the differences 1.1 ± 1.3; P < 0.01). Most frequently the QI perioperative morbidity and mortality report (5 centers) and the QI temperature management (4 centers) could be implemented. After the implementation phase, the QI incidence management and patient blood management were implemented in all 16 centers. Implementation of other quality indicators failed mainly due to a lack of time and lack of structural resources. CONCLUSION: In this study the implementation of QI was proven to be mostly feasible in the participating German hospitals. Although several QI could be implemented with minor effort, more time, financial and structural resources would be required for some QI, such as the QI postoperative visit. Springer Medizin 2020-07-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8674175/ /pubmed/32377798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Originalien
Ziemann, S.
Coburn, M.
Rossaint, R.
Van Waesberghe, J.
Bürkle, H.
Fries, M.
Henrich, M.
Henzler, D.
Iber, T.
Karst, J.
Kunitz, O.
Löb, R.
Meißner, W.
Meybohm, P.
Mierke, B.
Pabst, F.
Schaelte, G.
Schiff, J.
Soehle, M.
Winterhalter, M.
Kowark, A.
Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title_full Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title_fullStr Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title_short Implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in Germany: A prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
title_sort implementation of anesthesia quality indicators in germany: a prospective, national, multicenter quality improvement study
topic Originalien
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32377798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00773-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ziemanns implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT coburnm implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT rossaintr implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT vanwaesberghej implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT burkleh implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT friesm implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT henrichm implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT henzlerd implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT ibert implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT karstj implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT kunitzo implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT lobr implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT meißnerw implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT meybohmp implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT mierkeb implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT pabstf implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT schaelteg implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT schiffj implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT soehlem implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT winterhalterm implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy
AT kowarka implementationofanesthesiaqualityindicatorsingermanyaprospectivenationalmulticenterqualityimprovementstudy