Cargando…

Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes

To reconstruct locomotor behaviors of fossil hominins and understand the evolution of bipedal locomotion in the human lineage, it is important to clarify the functional morphology of the talar trochlea in humans and extant great apes. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the interspecif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nozaki, Shuhei, Oishi, Motoharu, Ogihara, Naomichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03429-y
_version_ 1784615633369956352
author Nozaki, Shuhei
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
author_facet Nozaki, Shuhei
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
author_sort Nozaki, Shuhei
collection PubMed
description To reconstruct locomotor behaviors of fossil hominins and understand the evolution of bipedal locomotion in the human lineage, it is important to clarify the functional morphology of the talar trochlea in humans and extant great apes. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the interspecific-differences of the talar trochlear morphology among humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans by means of cone frustum approximation to calculate an apical angle and geometric morphometrics for detailed variability in the shape of the talar trochlea. The apical angles in gorillas and orangutans were significantly greater than those in humans and chimpanzees, but no statistical difference was observed between humans and chimpanzees, indicating that the apical angle did not necessarily correspond with the degree of arboreality in hominoids. The geometric morphometrics revealed clear interspecific differences in the trochlear morphology, but no clear association between the morphological characteristics of the trochlea and locomotor behavior was observed. The morphology of the trochlea may not be a distinct skeletal correlate of locomotor behavior, possibly because the morphology is determined not only by locomotor behavior, but also by other factors such as phylogeny and body size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8674354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86743542021-12-20 Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes Nozaki, Shuhei Oishi, Motoharu Ogihara, Naomichi Sci Rep Article To reconstruct locomotor behaviors of fossil hominins and understand the evolution of bipedal locomotion in the human lineage, it is important to clarify the functional morphology of the talar trochlea in humans and extant great apes. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the interspecific-differences of the talar trochlear morphology among humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans by means of cone frustum approximation to calculate an apical angle and geometric morphometrics for detailed variability in the shape of the talar trochlea. The apical angles in gorillas and orangutans were significantly greater than those in humans and chimpanzees, but no statistical difference was observed between humans and chimpanzees, indicating that the apical angle did not necessarily correspond with the degree of arboreality in hominoids. The geometric morphometrics revealed clear interspecific differences in the trochlear morphology, but no clear association between the morphological characteristics of the trochlea and locomotor behavior was observed. The morphology of the trochlea may not be a distinct skeletal correlate of locomotor behavior, possibly because the morphology is determined not only by locomotor behavior, but also by other factors such as phylogeny and body size. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8674354/ /pubmed/34911997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03429-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nozaki, Shuhei
Oishi, Motoharu
Ogihara, Naomichi
Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title_full Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title_fullStr Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title_full_unstemmed Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title_short Talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
title_sort talar trochlear morphology may not be a good skeletal indicator of locomotor behavior in humans and great apes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03429-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nozakishuhei talartrochlearmorphologymaynotbeagoodskeletalindicatoroflocomotorbehaviorinhumansandgreatapes
AT oishimotoharu talartrochlearmorphologymaynotbeagoodskeletalindicatoroflocomotorbehaviorinhumansandgreatapes
AT ogiharanaomichi talartrochlearmorphologymaynotbeagoodskeletalindicatoroflocomotorbehaviorinhumansandgreatapes