Cargando…
“Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion
Previous research has mostly focused on Internet use behaviors, such as usage time of the Internet or social media after individuals experienced offline social exclusion. However, the extant literature has ignored online response behaviors, such as online review responses to social exclusion. To add...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783483 |
_version_ | 1784615645247176704 |
---|---|
author | Liang, Shichang Chu, Yuxuan Wang, Yunshan Zhang, Ziqi Wu, Yunjie Chang, Yaping |
author_facet | Liang, Shichang Chu, Yuxuan Wang, Yunshan Zhang, Ziqi Wu, Yunjie Chang, Yaping |
author_sort | Liang, Shichang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has mostly focused on Internet use behaviors, such as usage time of the Internet or social media after individuals experienced offline social exclusion. However, the extant literature has ignored online response behaviors, such as online review responses to social exclusion. To address this gap, drawing on self-protection and self-serving bias, we proposed three hypotheses that examine the effect of offline social exclusion on online reviews, which are verified by two studies using different simulating scenarios with 464 participants. The results show that when individuals are socially excluded offline, regardless of where the exclusion comes from (businesses or peers), they will be more likely to give negative online reviews. In addition, brand awareness moderates the effect of offline social exclusion on online reviews. Specifically, if the brand is less known, compared with social inclusion, offline social exclusion will lead individuals to give more negative online reviews; conversely, for well-known brands, no significant difference exists in the online reviews between social exclusion and inclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8674422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86744222021-12-17 “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion Liang, Shichang Chu, Yuxuan Wang, Yunshan Zhang, Ziqi Wu, Yunjie Chang, Yaping Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has mostly focused on Internet use behaviors, such as usage time of the Internet or social media after individuals experienced offline social exclusion. However, the extant literature has ignored online response behaviors, such as online review responses to social exclusion. To address this gap, drawing on self-protection and self-serving bias, we proposed three hypotheses that examine the effect of offline social exclusion on online reviews, which are verified by two studies using different simulating scenarios with 464 participants. The results show that when individuals are socially excluded offline, regardless of where the exclusion comes from (businesses or peers), they will be more likely to give negative online reviews. In addition, brand awareness moderates the effect of offline social exclusion on online reviews. Specifically, if the brand is less known, compared with social inclusion, offline social exclusion will lead individuals to give more negative online reviews; conversely, for well-known brands, no significant difference exists in the online reviews between social exclusion and inclusion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8674422/ /pubmed/34925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783483 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liang, Chu, Wang, Zhang, Wu and Chang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Liang, Shichang Chu, Yuxuan Wang, Yunshan Zhang, Ziqi Wu, Yunjie Chang, Yaping “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title | “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title_full | “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title_fullStr | “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title_full_unstemmed | “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title_short | “Scapegoat” for Offline Consumption: Online Review Response to Social Exclusion |
title_sort | “scapegoat” for offline consumption: online review response to social exclusion |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.783483 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liangshichang scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion AT chuyuxuan scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion AT wangyunshan scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion AT zhangziqi scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion AT wuyunjie scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion AT changyaping scapegoatforofflineconsumptiononlinereviewresponsetosocialexclusion |