Cargando…

“Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study

Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Fengsu, Cerulli, Catherine, Wittink, Marsha N., Caine, Eric D., Qiu, Peiyuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711819
_version_ 1784615646823186432
author Hou, Fengsu
Cerulli, Catherine
Wittink, Marsha N.
Caine, Eric D.
Qiu, Peiyuan
author_facet Hou, Fengsu
Cerulli, Catherine
Wittink, Marsha N.
Caine, Eric D.
Qiu, Peiyuan
author_sort Hou, Fengsu
collection PubMed
description Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prevent and address IPV. This study completed the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) among a subset sample from a large epidemiology study in rural Sichuan China. The social ecological model was applied to analyze qualitative interviews. Among 339 participants, the average age was 46.01 ± 12.42 years old. There were 31.86% of them had been educated, 14.75% of them had migrant worker partners, and 49.26% of them had experienced violence from their partners in the last year. There were 252 participants attributed IPV to individual factors, and they primarily discussed the social characteristics, behaviors, personalities or even health problems of the husband or the wife in the vignette. Under this theme, there were 86 participants blaming the victim for being anxious, social disconnectedness or lazy; and there were 166 participants blaming to the perpetrator being abusive, irresponsibility, lack of understanding, and cheating. There were 44 women believed the cause was relational, in which there were 41 participants attributed the problem to the broken relationship between the couple and three participants attributed to the lack of support. There were 28 participants believed the cause was communal and societal, such as being poor, family problems, fate, and believed IPV was a common scene. There were 15 participants could not identify the cause of IPV. These participants usually provided very brief responses and barely had insight on violent behaviors or confidence in discussing the cause. Our findings offer a direction for understanding the rural Chinese women's beliefs about the etiology of IPV to better develop interventions which must consider raising a public awareness campaign about the risk factors of IPV and focus on reducing self-blame among victims.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8674428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86744282021-12-17 “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study Hou, Fengsu Cerulli, Catherine Wittink, Marsha N. Caine, Eric D. Qiu, Peiyuan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prevent and address IPV. This study completed the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) among a subset sample from a large epidemiology study in rural Sichuan China. The social ecological model was applied to analyze qualitative interviews. Among 339 participants, the average age was 46.01 ± 12.42 years old. There were 31.86% of them had been educated, 14.75% of them had migrant worker partners, and 49.26% of them had experienced violence from their partners in the last year. There were 252 participants attributed IPV to individual factors, and they primarily discussed the social characteristics, behaviors, personalities or even health problems of the husband or the wife in the vignette. Under this theme, there were 86 participants blaming the victim for being anxious, social disconnectedness or lazy; and there were 166 participants blaming to the perpetrator being abusive, irresponsibility, lack of understanding, and cheating. There were 44 women believed the cause was relational, in which there were 41 participants attributed the problem to the broken relationship between the couple and three participants attributed to the lack of support. There were 28 participants believed the cause was communal and societal, such as being poor, family problems, fate, and believed IPV was a common scene. There were 15 participants could not identify the cause of IPV. These participants usually provided very brief responses and barely had insight on violent behaviors or confidence in discussing the cause. Our findings offer a direction for understanding the rural Chinese women's beliefs about the etiology of IPV to better develop interventions which must consider raising a public awareness campaign about the risk factors of IPV and focus on reducing self-blame among victims. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8674428/ /pubmed/34925082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711819 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hou, Cerulli, Wittink, Caine and Qiu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Hou, Fengsu
Cerulli, Catherine
Wittink, Marsha N.
Caine, Eric D.
Qiu, Peiyuan
“Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_full “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_short “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_sort “whose fault is it?” how rural chinese women explain intimate partner violence: a qualitative study
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711819
work_keys_str_mv AT houfengsu whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT cerullicatherine whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT wittinkmarshan whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT caineericd whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT qiupeiyuan whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy