Cargando…

How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species

Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Douhard, Frédéric, Douhard, Mathieu, Gilbert, Hélène, Monget, Philippe, Gaillard, Jean‐Michel, Lemaître, Jean‐François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320
_version_ 1784615767414669312
author Douhard, Frédéric
Douhard, Mathieu
Gilbert, Hélène
Monget, Philippe
Gaillard, Jean‐Michel
Lemaître, Jean‐François
author_facet Douhard, Frédéric
Douhard, Mathieu
Gilbert, Hélène
Monget, Philippe
Gaillard, Jean‐Michel
Lemaître, Jean‐François
author_sort Douhard, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade‐offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self‐maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade‐off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade‐offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8674892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86748922021-12-22 How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species Douhard, Frédéric Douhard, Mathieu Gilbert, Hélène Monget, Philippe Gaillard, Jean‐Michel Lemaître, Jean‐François Evol Appl Perspective Trade‐offs between life history traits are expected to occur due to the limited amount of resources that organisms can obtain and share among biological functions, but are of least concern for selection responses in nutrient‐rich or benign environments. In domestic animals, selection limits have not yet been reached despite strong selection for higher meat, milk or egg yields. Yet, negative genetic correlations between productivity traits and health or fertility traits have often been reported, supporting the view that trade‐offs do occur in the context of nonlimiting resources. The importance of allocation mechanisms in limiting genetic changes can thus be questioned when animals are mostly constrained by their time to acquire and process energy rather than by feed availability. Selection for high productivity traits early in life should promote a fast metabolism with less energy allocated to self‐maintenance (contributing to soma preservation and repair). Consequently, the capacity to breed shortly after an intensive period of production or to remain healthy should be compromised. We assessed those predictions in mammalian and avian livestock and related laboratory model species. First, we surveyed studies that compared energy allocation to maintenance between breeds or lines of contrasting productivity but found little support for the occurrence of an energy allocation trade‐off. Second, selection experiments for lower feed intake per unit of product (i.e. higher feed efficiency) generally resulted in reduced allocation to maintenance, but this did not entail fitness costs in terms of survival or future reproduction. These findings indicate that the consequences of a particular selection in domestic animals are much more difficult to predict than one could anticipate from the energy allocation framework alone. Future developments to predict the contribution of time constraints and trade‐offs to selection limits will be insightful to breed livestock in increasingly challenging environments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8674892/ /pubmed/34950226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Douhard, Frédéric
Douhard, Mathieu
Gilbert, Hélène
Monget, Philippe
Gaillard, Jean‐Michel
Lemaître, Jean‐François
How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_full How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_fullStr How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_full_unstemmed How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_short How much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? Insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
title_sort how much energetic trade‐offs limit selection? insights from livestock and related laboratory model species
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8674892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34950226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13320
work_keys_str_mv AT douhardfrederic howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT douhardmathieu howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT gilberthelene howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT mongetphilippe howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT gaillardjeanmichel howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies
AT lemaitrejeanfrancois howmuchenergetictradeoffslimitselectioninsightsfromlivestockandrelatedlaboratorymodelspecies