Cargando…

A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Lingsong, Zhao, Xin, Lu, Lin, Xing, Qingna, Wang, Kaiyu, Guo, Yafei, Shang, Honglei, Chen, Yan, Huang, Mengyue, Sun, Yongbing, Zhang, Xiaoan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.779642
_version_ 1784615805034430464
author Meng, Lingsong
Zhao, Xin
Lu, Lin
Xing, Qingna
Wang, Kaiyu
Guo, Yafei
Shang, Honglei
Chen, Yan
Huang, Mengyue
Sun, Yongbing
Zhang, Xiaoan
author_facet Meng, Lingsong
Zhao, Xin
Lu, Lin
Xing, Qingna
Wang, Kaiyu
Guo, Yafei
Shang, Honglei
Chen, Yan
Huang, Mengyue
Sun, Yongbing
Zhang, Xiaoan
author_sort Meng, Lingsong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test. RESULTS: The study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity. CONCLUSION: For MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86750812021-12-17 A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Meng, Lingsong Zhao, Xin Lu, Lin Xing, Qingna Wang, Kaiyu Guo, Yafei Shang, Honglei Chen, Yan Huang, Mengyue Sun, Yongbing Zhang, Xiaoan Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category 4 lesions at dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent breast MRI from March 2020 to June 2021. All image data were acquired with a 3-T MRI system. Kaiser score of each lesion was assigned by an experienced breast radiologist. Kaiser score+ was determined by combining ADC and Kaiser score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Kaiser score+, Kaiser score, and ADC. The area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared by using the Delong test. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between different indicators were determined by the McNemar test. RESULTS: The study involved 243 women (mean age, 43.1 years; age range, 18–67 years) with 268 MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. Overall diagnostic performance for Kaiser score (AUC, 0.902) was significantly higher than for ADC (AUC, 0.81; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in AUCs between Kaiser score and Kaiser score+ (p = 0.134). The Kaiser score was superior to ADC in avoiding unnecessary biopsies (p < 0.001). Compared with the Kaiser score alone, the specificity of Kaiser score+ increased by 7.82%, however, at the price of a lower sensitivity. CONCLUSION: For MR BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions, the Kaiser score was superior to ADC mapping regarding the potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies. However, the combination of both indicators did not significantly contribute to breast cancer diagnosis of this subgroup. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8675081/ /pubmed/34926290 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.779642 Text en Copyright © 2021 Meng, Zhao, Lu, Xing, Wang, Guo, Shang, Chen, Huang, Sun and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Meng, Lingsong
Zhao, Xin
Lu, Lin
Xing, Qingna
Wang, Kaiyu
Guo, Yafei
Shang, Honglei
Chen, Yan
Huang, Mengyue
Sun, Yongbing
Zhang, Xiaoan
A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_full A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_fullStr A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_short A Comparative Assessment of MR BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions With Kaiser Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
title_sort comparative assessment of mr bi-rads 4 breast lesions with kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient value
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926290
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.779642
work_keys_str_mv AT menglingsong acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT zhaoxin acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT lulin acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xingqingna acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT wangkaiyu acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT guoyafei acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT shanghonglei acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT chenyan acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT huangmengyue acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT sunyongbing acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT zhangxiaoan acomparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT menglingsong comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT zhaoxin comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT lulin comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT xingqingna comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT wangkaiyu comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT guoyafei comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT shanghonglei comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT chenyan comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT huangmengyue comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT sunyongbing comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue
AT zhangxiaoan comparativeassessmentofmrbirads4breastlesionswithkaiserscoreandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvalue