Cargando…

Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?

Multimodal perception is a key factor in obtaining a rich and meaningful representation of the world. However, how each stimulus combines to determine the overall percept remains a matter of research. The present work investigates the effect of sound on the bimodal perception of motion. A visual mov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlini, Alessandro, Bigand, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751248
_version_ 1784615809533870080
author Carlini, Alessandro
Bigand, Emmanuel
author_facet Carlini, Alessandro
Bigand, Emmanuel
author_sort Carlini, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description Multimodal perception is a key factor in obtaining a rich and meaningful representation of the world. However, how each stimulus combines to determine the overall percept remains a matter of research. The present work investigates the effect of sound on the bimodal perception of motion. A visual moving target was presented to the participants, associated with a concurrent sound, in a time reproduction task. Particular attention was paid to the structure of both the auditory and the visual stimuli. Four different laws of motion were tested for the visual motion, one of which is biological. Nine different sound profiles were tested, from an easier constant sound to more variable and complex pitch profiles, always presented synchronously with motion. Participants’ responses show that constant sounds produce the worst duration estimation performance, even worse than the silent condition; more complex sounds, instead, guarantee significantly better performance. The structure of the visual stimulus and that of the auditory stimulus appear to condition the performance independently. Biological motion provides the best performance, while the motion featured by a constant-velocity profile provides the worst performance. Results clearly show that a concurrent sound influences the unified perception of motion; the type and magnitude of the bias depends on the structure of the sound stimulus. Contrary to expectations, the best performance is not generated by the simplest stimuli, but rather by more complex stimuli that are richer in information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86751012021-12-17 Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion? Carlini, Alessandro Bigand, Emmanuel Front Psychol Psychology Multimodal perception is a key factor in obtaining a rich and meaningful representation of the world. However, how each stimulus combines to determine the overall percept remains a matter of research. The present work investigates the effect of sound on the bimodal perception of motion. A visual moving target was presented to the participants, associated with a concurrent sound, in a time reproduction task. Particular attention was paid to the structure of both the auditory and the visual stimuli. Four different laws of motion were tested for the visual motion, one of which is biological. Nine different sound profiles were tested, from an easier constant sound to more variable and complex pitch profiles, always presented synchronously with motion. Participants’ responses show that constant sounds produce the worst duration estimation performance, even worse than the silent condition; more complex sounds, instead, guarantee significantly better performance. The structure of the visual stimulus and that of the auditory stimulus appear to condition the performance independently. Biological motion provides the best performance, while the motion featured by a constant-velocity profile provides the worst performance. Results clearly show that a concurrent sound influences the unified perception of motion; the type and magnitude of the bias depends on the structure of the sound stimulus. Contrary to expectations, the best performance is not generated by the simplest stimuli, but rather by more complex stimuli that are richer in information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8675101/ /pubmed/34925155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751248 Text en Copyright © 2021 Carlini and Bigand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Carlini, Alessandro
Bigand, Emmanuel
Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title_full Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title_fullStr Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title_full_unstemmed Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title_short Does Sound Influence Perceived Duration of Visual Motion?
title_sort does sound influence perceived duration of visual motion?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925155
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751248
work_keys_str_mv AT carlinialessandro doessoundinfluenceperceiveddurationofvisualmotion
AT bigandemmanuel doessoundinfluenceperceiveddurationofvisualmotion