Cargando…

Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chicoine, Gabrielle, Côté, José, Pepin, Jacinthe, Fontaine, Guillaume, Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André, Hong, Quan Nha, Rouleau, Geneviève, Ziegler, Daniela, Jutras-Aswad, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0
_version_ 1784615874402975744
author Chicoine, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Pepin, Jacinthe
Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Hong, Quan Nha
Rouleau, Geneviève
Ziegler, Daniela
Jutras-Aswad, Didier
author_facet Chicoine, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Pepin, Jacinthe
Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Hong, Quan Nha
Rouleau, Geneviève
Ziegler, Daniela
Jutras-Aswad, Didier
author_sort Chicoine, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO model is increasingly available in the literature, what influences the model effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) evidence regarding the ECHO Model effectiveness and the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants about what influences the development of competencies in healthcare professionals. METHODS: The proposed systematic review was inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSR) and will follow a convergent segregated approach. A systematic search will be undertaken using QUAN, QUAL and mixed methods (MM) studies of ECHO-affiliated programs identified in six databases. A publication date filter will be applied to find the articles published from 2003 onwards. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched as well. Retrieved citations will independently be screened by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion until a consensus is reached or by including a third reviewer. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria will be assessed on methodological quality and the data will be extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Separate QUAN and QUAL synthesis will be performed, and findings will be integrated using a matrix approach for the purpose of comparison and complementarity. DISCUSSION: This MMSR will fulfill important gaps in the current literature on the ECHO Model as the first to provide estimates on its effectiveness and consider simultaneously the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants. As each replication of the ECHO Model greatly varies depending on the context, topic, and targeted professionals, a better understanding of what influences the model effectiveness in developing healthcare professionals’ competencies is crucial to inform future implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197579 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86754572021-12-20 Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol Chicoine, Gabrielle Côté, José Pepin, Jacinthe Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Hong, Quan Nha Rouleau, Geneviève Ziegler, Daniela Jutras-Aswad, Didier Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO model is increasingly available in the literature, what influences the model effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) evidence regarding the ECHO Model effectiveness and the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants about what influences the development of competencies in healthcare professionals. METHODS: The proposed systematic review was inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSR) and will follow a convergent segregated approach. A systematic search will be undertaken using QUAN, QUAL and mixed methods (MM) studies of ECHO-affiliated programs identified in six databases. A publication date filter will be applied to find the articles published from 2003 onwards. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched as well. Retrieved citations will independently be screened by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion until a consensus is reached or by including a third reviewer. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria will be assessed on methodological quality and the data will be extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Separate QUAN and QUAL synthesis will be performed, and findings will be integrated using a matrix approach for the purpose of comparison and complementarity. DISCUSSION: This MMSR will fulfill important gaps in the current literature on the ECHO Model as the first to provide estimates on its effectiveness and consider simultaneously the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants. As each replication of the ECHO Model greatly varies depending on the context, topic, and targeted professionals, a better understanding of what influences the model effectiveness in developing healthcare professionals’ competencies is crucial to inform future implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197579 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0. BioMed Central 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8675457/ /pubmed/34911579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Chicoine, Gabrielle
Côté, José
Pepin, Jacinthe
Fontaine, Guillaume
Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André
Hong, Quan Nha
Rouleau, Geneviève
Ziegler, Daniela
Jutras-Aswad, Didier
Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title_full Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title_short Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
title_sort effectiveness and experiences of the extension for community healthcare outcomes (echo) model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chicoinegabrielle effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT cotejose effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT pepinjacinthe effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT fontaineguillaume effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT maheucadottemarcandre effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT hongquannha effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT rouleaugenevieve effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT zieglerdaniela effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol
AT jutrasaswaddidier effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol