Cargando…
Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol
BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0 |
_version_ | 1784615874402975744 |
---|---|
author | Chicoine, Gabrielle Côté, José Pepin, Jacinthe Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Hong, Quan Nha Rouleau, Geneviève Ziegler, Daniela Jutras-Aswad, Didier |
author_facet | Chicoine, Gabrielle Côté, José Pepin, Jacinthe Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Hong, Quan Nha Rouleau, Geneviève Ziegler, Daniela Jutras-Aswad, Didier |
author_sort | Chicoine, Gabrielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO model is increasingly available in the literature, what influences the model effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) evidence regarding the ECHO Model effectiveness and the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants about what influences the development of competencies in healthcare professionals. METHODS: The proposed systematic review was inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSR) and will follow a convergent segregated approach. A systematic search will be undertaken using QUAN, QUAL and mixed methods (MM) studies of ECHO-affiliated programs identified in six databases. A publication date filter will be applied to find the articles published from 2003 onwards. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched as well. Retrieved citations will independently be screened by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion until a consensus is reached or by including a third reviewer. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria will be assessed on methodological quality and the data will be extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Separate QUAN and QUAL synthesis will be performed, and findings will be integrated using a matrix approach for the purpose of comparison and complementarity. DISCUSSION: This MMSR will fulfill important gaps in the current literature on the ECHO Model as the first to provide estimates on its effectiveness and consider simultaneously the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants. As each replication of the ECHO Model greatly varies depending on the context, topic, and targeted professionals, a better understanding of what influences the model effectiveness in developing healthcare professionals’ competencies is crucial to inform future implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197579 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8675457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86754572021-12-20 Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol Chicoine, Gabrielle Côté, José Pepin, Jacinthe Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Hong, Quan Nha Rouleau, Geneviève Ziegler, Daniela Jutras-Aswad, Didier Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model of continuing tele-education is an innovative guided-practice model aiming at amplifying healthcare professionals’ competencies in the management of chronic and complex health conditions. While data on the impact of the ECHO model is increasingly available in the literature, what influences the model effectiveness remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the available quantitative (QUAN) and qualitative (QUAL) evidence regarding the ECHO Model effectiveness and the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants about what influences the development of competencies in healthcare professionals. METHODS: The proposed systematic review was inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews (MMSR) and will follow a convergent segregated approach. A systematic search will be undertaken using QUAN, QUAL and mixed methods (MM) studies of ECHO-affiliated programs identified in six databases. A publication date filter will be applied to find the articles published from 2003 onwards. Sources of unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched as well. Retrieved citations will independently be screened by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion until a consensus is reached or by including a third reviewer. Studies meeting the predefined inclusion criteria will be assessed on methodological quality and the data will be extracted using standardized data extraction forms. Separate QUAN and QUAL synthesis will be performed, and findings will be integrated using a matrix approach for the purpose of comparison and complementarity. DISCUSSION: This MMSR will fulfill important gaps in the current literature on the ECHO Model as the first to provide estimates on its effectiveness and consider simultaneously the experiences/views of ECHO’s participants. As each replication of the ECHO Model greatly varies depending on the context, topic, and targeted professionals, a better understanding of what influences the model effectiveness in developing healthcare professionals’ competencies is crucial to inform future implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020197579 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0. BioMed Central 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8675457/ /pubmed/34911579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Chicoine, Gabrielle Côté, José Pepin, Jacinthe Fontaine, Guillaume Maheu-Cadotte, Marc-André Hong, Quan Nha Rouleau, Geneviève Ziegler, Daniela Jutras-Aswad, Didier Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title | Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title_full | Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title_short | Effectiveness and experiences of the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
title_sort | effectiveness and experiences of the extension for community healthcare outcomes (echo) model in developing competencies among healthcare professionals: a mixed methods systematic review protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01832-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chicoinegabrielle effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT cotejose effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT pepinjacinthe effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT fontaineguillaume effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT maheucadottemarcandre effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT hongquannha effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT rouleaugenevieve effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT zieglerdaniela effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol AT jutrasaswaddidier effectivenessandexperiencesoftheextensionforcommunityhealthcareoutcomesechomodelindevelopingcompetenciesamonghealthcareprofessionalsamixedmethodssystematicreviewprotocol |