Cargando…

Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance

BACKGROUND: Stationary cycling is commonly used for postoperative rehabilitation of physical disabilities; however, few studies have focused on the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of rehabilitation. This study aimed to elucidate the three-dimensional lower limb kinematics of people with healthy mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yum, Haeun, Kim, Hyang, Lee, Taeyong, Park, Moon Seok, Lee, Seung Yeol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2
_version_ 1784615885249445888
author Yum, Haeun
Kim, Hyang
Lee, Taeyong
Park, Moon Seok
Lee, Seung Yeol
author_facet Yum, Haeun
Kim, Hyang
Lee, Taeyong
Park, Moon Seok
Lee, Seung Yeol
author_sort Yum, Haeun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stationary cycling is commonly used for postoperative rehabilitation of physical disabilities; however, few studies have focused on the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of rehabilitation. This study aimed to elucidate the three-dimensional lower limb kinematics of people with healthy musculoskeletal function and the effect of sex and age on kinematics using a controlled bicycle configuration. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy adults participated in the study. The position of the stationary cycle was standardized using the LeMond method by setting the saddle height to 85.5% of the participant’s inseam. The participants maintained a pedaling rate of 10–12 km/h, and the average value of three successive cycles of the right leg was used for analysis. The pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle joint motions during cycling were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. Kinematic data were normalized to 0–100% of the cycling cycle. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and k-fold cross-validation were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the sagittal plane, the cycling ranges of motion (ROMs) were 1.6° (pelvis), 43.9° (hip), 75.2° (knee), and 26.9° (ankle). The coronal plane movement was observed in all joints, and the specific ROMs were 6.6° (knee) and 5.8° (ankle). There was significant internal and external rotation of the hip (ROM: 11.6°), knee (ROM: 6.6°), and ankle (ROM: 10.3°) during cycling. There was no difference in kinematic data of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle between the sexes (p = 0.12 to 0.95) and between different age groups (p = 0.11 to 0.96) in all anatomical planes. CONCLUSIONS: The kinematic results support the view that cycling is highly beneficial for comprehensive musculoskeletal rehabilitation. These results might help clinicians set a target of recovery ROM based on healthy and non-elite individuals and issue suitable guidelines to patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86755122021-12-20 Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance Yum, Haeun Kim, Hyang Lee, Taeyong Park, Moon Seok Lee, Seung Yeol BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Stationary cycling is commonly used for postoperative rehabilitation of physical disabilities; however, few studies have focused on the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of rehabilitation. This study aimed to elucidate the three-dimensional lower limb kinematics of people with healthy musculoskeletal function and the effect of sex and age on kinematics using a controlled bicycle configuration. METHODS: Thirty-one healthy adults participated in the study. The position of the stationary cycle was standardized using the LeMond method by setting the saddle height to 85.5% of the participant’s inseam. The participants maintained a pedaling rate of 10–12 km/h, and the average value of three successive cycles of the right leg was used for analysis. The pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle joint motions during cycling were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes. Kinematic data were normalized to 0–100% of the cycling cycle. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and k-fold cross-validation were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the sagittal plane, the cycling ranges of motion (ROMs) were 1.6° (pelvis), 43.9° (hip), 75.2° (knee), and 26.9° (ankle). The coronal plane movement was observed in all joints, and the specific ROMs were 6.6° (knee) and 5.8° (ankle). There was significant internal and external rotation of the hip (ROM: 11.6°), knee (ROM: 6.6°), and ankle (ROM: 10.3°) during cycling. There was no difference in kinematic data of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle between the sexes (p = 0.12 to 0.95) and between different age groups (p = 0.11 to 0.96) in all anatomical planes. CONCLUSIONS: The kinematic results support the view that cycling is highly beneficial for comprehensive musculoskeletal rehabilitation. These results might help clinicians set a target of recovery ROM based on healthy and non-elite individuals and issue suitable guidelines to patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2. BioMed Central 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8675512/ /pubmed/34911507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yum, Haeun
Kim, Hyang
Lee, Taeyong
Park, Moon Seok
Lee, Seung Yeol
Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title_full Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title_fullStr Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title_full_unstemmed Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title_short Cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
title_sort cycling kinematics in healthy adults for musculoskeletal rehabilitation guidance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34911507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04905-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yumhaeun cyclingkinematicsinhealthyadultsformusculoskeletalrehabilitationguidance
AT kimhyang cyclingkinematicsinhealthyadultsformusculoskeletalrehabilitationguidance
AT leetaeyong cyclingkinematicsinhealthyadultsformusculoskeletalrehabilitationguidance
AT parkmoonseok cyclingkinematicsinhealthyadultsformusculoskeletalrehabilitationguidance
AT leeseungyeol cyclingkinematicsinhealthyadultsformusculoskeletalrehabilitationguidance