Cargando…
Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate obje...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984052 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153 |
_version_ | 1784615906896248832 |
---|---|
author | Ramsey, Tam Ostrowski, Tyler Curran, Kent Mouzakes, Jason Gildener-Leapman, Neil |
author_facet | Ramsey, Tam Ostrowski, Tyler Curran, Kent Mouzakes, Jason Gildener-Leapman, Neil |
author_sort | Ramsey, Tam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate objective measures evaluated in this study are length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day morbidity. Methods: We collected data on otolaryngologic cases from 2016 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to associate work RVUs with objective measures of surgeon work. Linear regressions were used to identify predictors of work RVUs from the surrogate objective measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying procedures. Results: Work RVUs correlated strongly with operative time (R=0.6775), 30-day readmission (R=0.6100), and LOS (R=0.6083); moderately with 30-day reoperation (R=0.5257) and 30-day morbidity (R=0.4842); and very weakly with 30-day mortality (R=0.1383). The best predictors for work RVUs based on multivariable linear regression analysis were morbidity, reoperation, and operative time. Analysis revealed that the projected work RVU is 12.23 units higher than the current value for excision of bone, mandible (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 21025) and 19.48 units lower than the current value for resection/excision of lesion infratemporal fossa space apex extradural (CPT code 61605). Conclusion: Using objective surrogate measures for time and intensity of physician work in head and neck cases may improve work RVU assignment accuracy compared to the current system of physician survey. Future investigation with additional objective parameters may be beneficial to make work RVU assignments less subjective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8675618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86756182022-01-03 Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units Ramsey, Tam Ostrowski, Tyler Curran, Kent Mouzakes, Jason Gildener-Leapman, Neil Ochsner J Original Research Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate objective measures evaluated in this study are length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day morbidity. Methods: We collected data on otolaryngologic cases from 2016 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to associate work RVUs with objective measures of surgeon work. Linear regressions were used to identify predictors of work RVUs from the surrogate objective measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying procedures. Results: Work RVUs correlated strongly with operative time (R=0.6775), 30-day readmission (R=0.6100), and LOS (R=0.6083); moderately with 30-day reoperation (R=0.5257) and 30-day morbidity (R=0.4842); and very weakly with 30-day mortality (R=0.1383). The best predictors for work RVUs based on multivariable linear regression analysis were morbidity, reoperation, and operative time. Analysis revealed that the projected work RVU is 12.23 units higher than the current value for excision of bone, mandible (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 21025) and 19.48 units lower than the current value for resection/excision of lesion infratemporal fossa space apex extradural (CPT code 61605). Conclusion: Using objective surrogate measures for time and intensity of physician work in head and neck cases may improve work RVU assignment accuracy compared to the current system of physician survey. Future investigation with additional objective parameters may be beneficial to make work RVU assignments less subjective. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2021 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8675618/ /pubmed/34984052 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153 Text en ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/©2021 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ramsey, Tam Ostrowski, Tyler Curran, Kent Mouzakes, Jason Gildener-Leapman, Neil Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title | Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title_full | Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title_fullStr | Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title_full_unstemmed | Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title_short | Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units |
title_sort | association of surrogate objective measures with work relative value units |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984052 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramseytam associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits AT ostrowskityler associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits AT currankent associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits AT mouzakesjason associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits AT gildenerleapmanneil associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits |