Cargando…

Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units

Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramsey, Tam, Ostrowski, Tyler, Curran, Kent, Mouzakes, Jason, Gildener-Leapman, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984052
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153
_version_ 1784615906896248832
author Ramsey, Tam
Ostrowski, Tyler
Curran, Kent
Mouzakes, Jason
Gildener-Leapman, Neil
author_facet Ramsey, Tam
Ostrowski, Tyler
Curran, Kent
Mouzakes, Jason
Gildener-Leapman, Neil
author_sort Ramsey, Tam
collection PubMed
description Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate objective measures evaluated in this study are length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day morbidity. Methods: We collected data on otolaryngologic cases from 2016 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to associate work RVUs with objective measures of surgeon work. Linear regressions were used to identify predictors of work RVUs from the surrogate objective measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying procedures. Results: Work RVUs correlated strongly with operative time (R=0.6775), 30-day readmission (R=0.6100), and LOS (R=0.6083); moderately with 30-day reoperation (R=0.5257) and 30-day morbidity (R=0.4842); and very weakly with 30-day mortality (R=0.1383). The best predictors for work RVUs based on multivariable linear regression analysis were morbidity, reoperation, and operative time. Analysis revealed that the projected work RVU is 12.23 units higher than the current value for excision of bone, mandible (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 21025) and 19.48 units lower than the current value for resection/excision of lesion infratemporal fossa space apex extradural (CPT code 61605). Conclusion: Using objective surrogate measures for time and intensity of physician work in head and neck cases may improve work RVU assignment accuracy compared to the current system of physician survey. Future investigation with additional objective parameters may be beneficial to make work RVU assignments less subjective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86756182022-01-03 Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units Ramsey, Tam Ostrowski, Tyler Curran, Kent Mouzakes, Jason Gildener-Leapman, Neil Ochsner J Original Research Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate objective measures evaluated in this study are length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day morbidity. Methods: We collected data on otolaryngologic cases from 2016 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to associate work RVUs with objective measures of surgeon work. Linear regressions were used to identify predictors of work RVUs from the surrogate objective measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying procedures. Results: Work RVUs correlated strongly with operative time (R=0.6775), 30-day readmission (R=0.6100), and LOS (R=0.6083); moderately with 30-day reoperation (R=0.5257) and 30-day morbidity (R=0.4842); and very weakly with 30-day mortality (R=0.1383). The best predictors for work RVUs based on multivariable linear regression analysis were morbidity, reoperation, and operative time. Analysis revealed that the projected work RVU is 12.23 units higher than the current value for excision of bone, mandible (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 21025) and 19.48 units lower than the current value for resection/excision of lesion infratemporal fossa space apex extradural (CPT code 61605). Conclusion: Using objective surrogate measures for time and intensity of physician work in head and neck cases may improve work RVU assignment accuracy compared to the current system of physician survey. Future investigation with additional objective parameters may be beneficial to make work RVU assignments less subjective. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2021 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8675618/ /pubmed/34984052 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153 Text en ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/©2021 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ramsey, Tam
Ostrowski, Tyler
Curran, Kent
Mouzakes, Jason
Gildener-Leapman, Neil
Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title_full Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title_fullStr Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title_full_unstemmed Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title_short Association of Surrogate Objective Measures With Work Relative Value Units
title_sort association of surrogate objective measures with work relative value units
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984052
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0153
work_keys_str_mv AT ramseytam associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits
AT ostrowskityler associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits
AT currankent associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits
AT mouzakesjason associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits
AT gildenerleapmanneil associationofsurrogateobjectivemeasureswithworkrelativevalueunits