Cargando…

The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning

Feedback is essential for many kinds of learning, but the cognitive processes involved in learning from feedback are unclear. Models of category learning incorporate selective attention to stimulus features while generating a response, but during the feedback phase of an experiment, it is assumed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dolguikh, Katerina, Tracey, Tyrus, Blair, Mark R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259517
_version_ 1784615938663907328
author Dolguikh, Katerina
Tracey, Tyrus
Blair, Mark R.
author_facet Dolguikh, Katerina
Tracey, Tyrus
Blair, Mark R.
author_sort Dolguikh, Katerina
collection PubMed
description Feedback is essential for many kinds of learning, but the cognitive processes involved in learning from feedback are unclear. Models of category learning incorporate selective attention to stimulus features while generating a response, but during the feedback phase of an experiment, it is assumed that participants receive complete information about stimulus features as well as the correct category. The present work looks at eye tracking data from six category learning datasets covering a variety of category complexities and types. We find that selective attention to task-relevant information is pervasive throughout feedback processing, suggesting a role for selective attention in memory encoding of category exemplars. We also find that error trials elicit additional stimulus processing during the feedback phase. Finally, our data reveal that participants increasingly skip the processing of feedback altogether. At the broadest level, these three findings reveal that selective attention is ubiquitous throughout the entire category learning task, functioning to emphasize the importance of certain stimulus features, the helpfulness of extra stimulus encoding during times of uncertainty, and the superfluousness of feedback once one has learned the task. We discuss the implications of our findings for modelling efforts in category learning from the perspective of researchers trying to capture the full dynamic interaction of selective attention and learning, as well as for researchers focused on other issues, such as category representation, whose work only requires simplifications that do a reasonable job of capturing learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8675756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86757562021-12-17 The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning Dolguikh, Katerina Tracey, Tyrus Blair, Mark R. PLoS One Research Article Feedback is essential for many kinds of learning, but the cognitive processes involved in learning from feedback are unclear. Models of category learning incorporate selective attention to stimulus features while generating a response, but during the feedback phase of an experiment, it is assumed that participants receive complete information about stimulus features as well as the correct category. The present work looks at eye tracking data from six category learning datasets covering a variety of category complexities and types. We find that selective attention to task-relevant information is pervasive throughout feedback processing, suggesting a role for selective attention in memory encoding of category exemplars. We also find that error trials elicit additional stimulus processing during the feedback phase. Finally, our data reveal that participants increasingly skip the processing of feedback altogether. At the broadest level, these three findings reveal that selective attention is ubiquitous throughout the entire category learning task, functioning to emphasize the importance of certain stimulus features, the helpfulness of extra stimulus encoding during times of uncertainty, and the superfluousness of feedback once one has learned the task. We discuss the implications of our findings for modelling efforts in category learning from the perspective of researchers trying to capture the full dynamic interaction of selective attention and learning, as well as for researchers focused on other issues, such as category representation, whose work only requires simplifications that do a reasonable job of capturing learning. Public Library of Science 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8675756/ /pubmed/34914743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259517 Text en © 2021 Dolguikh et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dolguikh, Katerina
Tracey, Tyrus
Blair, Mark R.
The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title_full The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title_fullStr The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title_full_unstemmed The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title_short The ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
title_sort ubiquity of selective attention in the processing of feedback during category learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8675756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34914743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259517
work_keys_str_mv AT dolguikhkaterina theubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning
AT traceytyrus theubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning
AT blairmarkr theubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning
AT dolguikhkaterina ubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning
AT traceytyrus ubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning
AT blairmarkr ubiquityofselectiveattentionintheprocessingoffeedbackduringcategorylearning