Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model

Background: With the advent of aging society of China, fundus diseases related to pathological neovascularization, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and pathological myopia (PM), have become an increasingly serious medical and health problems. As effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Zhuang, Zhou, Wei, Chang, Qinxue, Zhang, Tiantian, Wang, Hui, Meng, Xiangda, Liu, Yuanyuan, Yan, Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.750132
_version_ 1784615980652036096
author Cui, Zhuang
Zhou, Wei
Chang, Qinxue
Zhang, Tiantian
Wang, Hui
Meng, Xiangda
Liu, Yuanyuan
Yan, Hua
author_facet Cui, Zhuang
Zhou, Wei
Chang, Qinxue
Zhang, Tiantian
Wang, Hui
Meng, Xiangda
Liu, Yuanyuan
Yan, Hua
author_sort Cui, Zhuang
collection PubMed
description Background: With the advent of aging society of China, fundus diseases related to pathological neovascularization, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and pathological myopia (PM), have become an increasingly serious medical and health problems. As effective drugs of the treatment, conbercept and ranibizumab have been commonly used and covered by the national basic medical insurance in China. However, the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of conbercept vs. ranibizumab for DME and PM remains lacking. This study would assess the cost-effectiveness of conbercept and ranibizumab for the treatment of AMD, DME, and PM from the perspective of Chinese payers. Methods: A Markov chain model was constructed based on the visual conditions of the patient indicated by the number of letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We conducted models based on real-world scenario to calculate the cost per the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. A 1-year cycle length and a 10-year simulation treatment were applied and the number of injections of conbercept and ranibizumab was assumed to the average number within 10 years. Transition probabilities, costs, utility data, and other parameters were obtained from literature searches. A 3.5% discounting rate was applied for both the costs and utilities. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were more favorable for conbercept than ranibizumab in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM, with associated ICER of 66,669 renminbi (RMB), −258,813 RMB, and −373,185 RMB per QALY gained. Compared with ranibizumab, the incremental effectiveness of conbercept in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM was −0.665 QALYs, 0.215 QALYs, and 0.029 QALYs, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed the same findings, although the ICER is sensitive to the costs of this program. Conclusion: Under the current Chinese healthcare setting, conbercept is suitable and cost-effective in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM compared with ranibizumab.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8676057
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86760572021-12-17 Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model Cui, Zhuang Zhou, Wei Chang, Qinxue Zhang, Tiantian Wang, Hui Meng, Xiangda Liu, Yuanyuan Yan, Hua Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: With the advent of aging society of China, fundus diseases related to pathological neovascularization, including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and pathological myopia (PM), have become an increasingly serious medical and health problems. As effective drugs of the treatment, conbercept and ranibizumab have been commonly used and covered by the national basic medical insurance in China. However, the pharmacoeconomic evaluation of conbercept vs. ranibizumab for DME and PM remains lacking. This study would assess the cost-effectiveness of conbercept and ranibizumab for the treatment of AMD, DME, and PM from the perspective of Chinese payers. Methods: A Markov chain model was constructed based on the visual conditions of the patient indicated by the number of letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). We conducted models based on real-world scenario to calculate the cost per the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. A 1-year cycle length and a 10-year simulation treatment were applied and the number of injections of conbercept and ranibizumab was assumed to the average number within 10 years. Transition probabilities, costs, utility data, and other parameters were obtained from literature searches. A 3.5% discounting rate was applied for both the costs and utilities. Results: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were more favorable for conbercept than ranibizumab in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM, with associated ICER of 66,669 renminbi (RMB), −258,813 RMB, and −373,185 RMB per QALY gained. Compared with ranibizumab, the incremental effectiveness of conbercept in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM was −0.665 QALYs, 0.215 QALYs, and 0.029 QALYs, respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed the same findings, although the ICER is sensitive to the costs of this program. Conclusion: Under the current Chinese healthcare setting, conbercept is suitable and cost-effective in treatment of AMD, DME, and PM compared with ranibizumab. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8676057/ /pubmed/34926500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.750132 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cui, Zhou, Chang, Zhang, Wang, Meng, Liu and Yan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Cui, Zhuang
Zhou, Wei
Chang, Qinxue
Zhang, Tiantian
Wang, Hui
Meng, Xiangda
Liu, Yuanyuan
Yan, Hua
Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model
title_sort cost-effectiveness of conbercept vs. ranibizumab for age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and pathological myopia: population-based cohort study and markov model
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676057/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.750132
work_keys_str_mv AT cuizhuang costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT zhouwei costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT changqinxue costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT zhangtiantian costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT wanghui costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT mengxiangda costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT liuyuanyuan costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel
AT yanhua costeffectivenessofconberceptvsranibizumabforagerelatedmaculardegenerationdiabeticmacularedemaandpathologicalmyopiapopulationbasedcohortstudyandmarkovmodel