Cargando…
Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial
BACKGROUND: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise ag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4 |
_version_ | 1784615984494018560 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Benjamin A Veenith, Tonny Slade, Daniel Gaskell, Charlotte Rowland, Matthew Whitehouse, Tony Scriven, James Parekh, Dhruv Balasubramaniam, Madhu S Cooke, Graham Morley, Nick Gabriel, Zoe Wise, Matthew P Porter, Joanna McShane, Helen Ho, Ling-Pei Newsome, Philip N Rowe, Anna Sharpe, Rowena Thickett, David R Bion, Julian Gates, Simon Richards, Duncan Kearns, Pamela |
author_facet | Fisher, Benjamin A Veenith, Tonny Slade, Daniel Gaskell, Charlotte Rowland, Matthew Whitehouse, Tony Scriven, James Parekh, Dhruv Balasubramaniam, Madhu S Cooke, Graham Morley, Nick Gabriel, Zoe Wise, Matthew P Porter, Joanna McShane, Helen Ho, Ling-Pei Newsome, Philip N Rowe, Anna Sharpe, Rowena Thickett, David R Bion, Julian Gates, Simon Richards, Duncan Kearns, Pamela |
author_sort | Fisher, Benjamin A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. FINDINGS: Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment–time interactions were –0·09 (95% CI –0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (–0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. INTERPRETATION: Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation—as measured by CRP concentration—in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. FUNDING: Medical Research Council. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8676420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86764202021-12-17 Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial Fisher, Benjamin A Veenith, Tonny Slade, Daniel Gaskell, Charlotte Rowland, Matthew Whitehouse, Tony Scriven, James Parekh, Dhruv Balasubramaniam, Madhu S Cooke, Graham Morley, Nick Gabriel, Zoe Wise, Matthew P Porter, Joanna McShane, Helen Ho, Ling-Pei Newsome, Philip N Rowe, Anna Sharpe, Rowena Thickett, David R Bion, Julian Gates, Simon Richards, Duncan Kearns, Pamela Lancet Respir Med Articles BACKGROUND: Dysregulated inflammation is associated with poor outcomes in COVID-19. We aimed to assess the efficacy of namilumab (a granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor inhibitor) and infliximab (a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, to prioritise agents for phase 3 trials. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, parallel-group, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial (CATALYST), we recruited patients (aged ≥16 years) admitted to hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations of 40 mg/L or greater, at nine hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned with equal probability to usual care or usual care plus a single intravenous dose of namilumab (150 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg). Randomisation was stratified by care location within the hospital (ward vs intensive care unit [ICU]). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was improvement in inflammation, measured by CRP concentration over time, analysed using Bayesian multilevel models. This trial is now complete and is registered with ISRCTN, 40580903. FINDINGS: Between June 15, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021, we screened 299 patients and 146 were enrolled and randomly assigned to usual care (n=54), namilumab (n=57), or infliximab (n=35). For the primary outcome, 45 patients in the usual care group were compared with 52 in the namilumab group, and 29 in the usual care group were compared with 28 in the infliximab group. The probabilities that the interventions were superior to usual care alone in reducing CRP concentration over time were 97% for namilumab and 15% for infliximab; the point estimates for treatment–time interactions were –0·09 (95% CI –0·19 to 0·00) for namilumab and 0·06 (–0·05 to 0·17) for infliximab. 134 adverse events occurred in 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the namilumab group compared with 145 in 29 (54%) of 54 in the usual care group. 102 adverse events occurred in 20 (69%) of 29 patients in the infliximab group compared with 112 in 17 (50%) of 34 in the usual care group. Death occurred in six (11%) patients in the namilumab group compared with ten (19%) in the usual care group, and in four (14%) in the infliximab group compared with five (15%) in the usual care group. INTERPRETATION: Namilumab, but not infliximab, showed proof-of-concept evidence for reduction in inflammation—as measured by CRP concentration—in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Namilumab should be prioritised for further investigation in COVID-19. FUNDING: Medical Research Council. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-03 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8676420/ /pubmed/34922649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Articles Fisher, Benjamin A Veenith, Tonny Slade, Daniel Gaskell, Charlotte Rowland, Matthew Whitehouse, Tony Scriven, James Parekh, Dhruv Balasubramaniam, Madhu S Cooke, Graham Morley, Nick Gabriel, Zoe Wise, Matthew P Porter, Joanna McShane, Helen Ho, Ling-Pei Newsome, Philip N Rowe, Anna Sharpe, Rowena Thickett, David R Bion, Julian Gates, Simon Richards, Duncan Kearns, Pamela Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title | Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title_full | Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title_fullStr | Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title_short | Namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
title_sort | namilumab or infliximab compared with standard of care in hospitalised patients with covid-19 (catalyst): a randomised, multicentre, multi-arm, multistage, open-label, adaptive, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34922649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00460-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fisherbenjamina namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT veenithtonny namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT sladedaniel namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT gaskellcharlotte namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT rowlandmatthew namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT whitehousetony namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT scrivenjames namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT parekhdhruv namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT balasubramaniammadhus namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT cookegraham namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT morleynick namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT gabrielzoe namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT wisematthewp namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT porterjoanna namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT mcshanehelen namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT holingpei namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT newsomephilipn namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT roweanna namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT sharperowena namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT thickettdavidr namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT bionjulian namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT gatessimon namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT richardsduncan namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT kearnspamela namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial AT namilumaborinfliximabcomparedwithstandardofcareinhospitalisedpatientswithcovid19catalystarandomisedmulticentremultiarmmultistageopenlabeladaptivephase2proofofconcepttrial |