Cargando…

Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkman, Scott, Hollingsworth, Bruce, Lake, Amelia, Hinke, Stephanie, Sorrell, Stewart, Burgoine, Thomas, Brown, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172
_version_ 1784616148295221248
author Kirkman, Scott
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Lake, Amelia
Hinke, Stephanie
Sorrell, Stewart
Burgoine, Thomas
Brown, Heather
author_facet Kirkman, Scott
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Lake, Amelia
Hinke, Stephanie
Sorrell, Stewart
Burgoine, Thomas
Brown, Heather
author_sort Kirkman, Scott
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. RESULTS: In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and <100 m for 77% of outlets. CONCLUSIONS: After an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8677439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86774392021-12-17 Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England Kirkman, Scott Hollingsworth, Bruce Lake, Amelia Hinke, Stephanie Sorrell, Stewart Burgoine, Thomas Brown, Heather J Public Health (Oxf) Editorial BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. RESULTS: In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and <100 m for 77% of outlets. CONCLUSIONS: After an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation. Oxford University Press 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8677439/ /pubmed/32970123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
Kirkman, Scott
Hollingsworth, Bruce
Lake, Amelia
Hinke, Stephanie
Sorrell, Stewart
Burgoine, Thomas
Brown, Heather
Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title_full Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title_fullStr Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title_full_unstemmed Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title_short Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
title_sort field validity and spatial accuracy of food standards agency food hygiene rating scheme data for england
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkmanscott fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT hollingsworthbruce fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT lakeamelia fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT hinkestephanie fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT sorrellstewart fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT burgoinethomas fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland
AT brownheather fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland