Cargando…
Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172 |
_version_ | 1784616148295221248 |
---|---|
author | Kirkman, Scott Hollingsworth, Bruce Lake, Amelia Hinke, Stephanie Sorrell, Stewart Burgoine, Thomas Brown, Heather |
author_facet | Kirkman, Scott Hollingsworth, Bruce Lake, Amelia Hinke, Stephanie Sorrell, Stewart Burgoine, Thomas Brown, Heather |
author_sort | Kirkman, Scott |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. RESULTS: In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and <100 m for 77% of outlets. CONCLUSIONS: After an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8677439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86774392021-12-17 Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England Kirkman, Scott Hollingsworth, Bruce Lake, Amelia Hinke, Stephanie Sorrell, Stewart Burgoine, Thomas Brown, Heather J Public Health (Oxf) Editorial BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and spatial accuracy of the Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating online data through a field audit. METHODS: A field audit was conducted in five Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in the North East of England. LSOAs were purposively selected from the top and bottom quintiles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation and from urban and rural areas. The FHRS data validity against the field data was measured as Positive Predictive Values (PPV) and sensitivity. Spatial accuracy was evaluated via mean difference in straight line distances between the FHRS coordinates and the field coordinates. RESULTS: In all, 182 premises were present in the field, of which 162 were in the FHRS data giving a sensitivity of 89%. Eight outlets recorded in the FHRS data were absent in the field, giving a PPV of 95%.The mean difference in the geographical coordinates of the field audit compared to the FHRS was 110 m, and <100 m for 77% of outlets. CONCLUSIONS: After an evaluation of the validity and spatial accuracy of the FHRS data, the results suggest that it is a useful dataset for surveillance of the food environment and for intervention evaluation. Oxford University Press 2020-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8677439/ /pubmed/32970123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Kirkman, Scott Hollingsworth, Bruce Lake, Amelia Hinke, Stephanie Sorrell, Stewart Burgoine, Thomas Brown, Heather Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title | Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title_full | Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title_fullStr | Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title_full_unstemmed | Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title_short | Field validity and spatial accuracy of Food Standards Agency Food Hygiene Rating scheme data for England |
title_sort | field validity and spatial accuracy of food standards agency food hygiene rating scheme data for england |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkmanscott fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT hollingsworthbruce fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT lakeamelia fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT hinkestephanie fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT sorrellstewart fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT burgoinethomas fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland AT brownheather fieldvalidityandspatialaccuracyoffoodstandardsagencyfoodhygieneratingschemedataforengland |