Cargando…
Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study
Our findings show that non-Dutch background, lower maternal education, and lower net household income level may be new risk factors for myopia development in the Netherlands. Newly introduced physical activity spaces may not be effective enough in increasing outdoor exposure in children to reduce ey...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001809 |
_version_ | 1784616174600847360 |
---|---|
author | Enthoven, Clair A. Mölenberg, Famke J. M. Tideman, J. Willem L. Polling, Jan Roelof Labrecque, Jeremy A. Raat, Hein van Lenthe, Frank J. Klaver, Caroline C. W. |
author_facet | Enthoven, Clair A. Mölenberg, Famke J. M. Tideman, J. Willem L. Polling, Jan Roelof Labrecque, Jeremy A. Raat, Hein van Lenthe, Frank J. Klaver, Caroline C. W. |
author_sort | Enthoven, Clair A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our findings show that non-Dutch background, lower maternal education, and lower net household income level may be new risk factors for myopia development in the Netherlands. Newly introduced physical activity spaces may not be effective enough in increasing outdoor exposure in children to reduce eye growth. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, outdoor exposure, and computer use and to investigate if newly introduced physical activity spaces can reduce eye growth in school-aged children. METHODS: Participants (N = 2643) from the Dutch population–based birth cohort Generation R were examined at ages 6 and 9 years. Socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, and lifestyle were determined using regression analyses. Information on physical activity spaces located in Rotterdam was obtained. Differences in eye growth between those who became exposed to new physical activity spaces (n = 230) and those nonexposed (n = 1866) were evaluated with individual-level fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Myopia prevalence was 2.2% at age 6 years and 12.2% at age 9 years. Outdoor exposure was 11.4 h/wk at age 6 years and 7.4 h/wk at age 9 years. Computer use was 2.1 h/wk at age 6 years and 5.2 h/wk at age 9 years. Myopia incidence was higher in children with non-Dutch background, and families with lower household income and lower maternal education (odds ratio [OR], 1.081 [95% confidence interval, 1.052 to 1.112]; OR, 1.035 [95% confidence interval, 1.008 to 1.063]; OR, 1.028 [95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.055], respectively). Children living <600 m of a physical activity space did not have increased outdoor exposure, except those from families with lower maternal education (β = 1.33 h/wk; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 2.51 h/wk). Newly introduced physical activity spaces were not associated with reduction of eye growth. CONCLUSIONS: Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families became more often myopic than those from socioeconomically advantaged families. We did not find evidence that physical activity spaces protect against myopia for the population at large, but subgroups may benefit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8677612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86776122021-12-23 Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study Enthoven, Clair A. Mölenberg, Famke J. M. Tideman, J. Willem L. Polling, Jan Roelof Labrecque, Jeremy A. Raat, Hein van Lenthe, Frank J. Klaver, Caroline C. W. Optom Vis Sci Original Investigations Our findings show that non-Dutch background, lower maternal education, and lower net household income level may be new risk factors for myopia development in the Netherlands. Newly introduced physical activity spaces may not be effective enough in increasing outdoor exposure in children to reduce eye growth. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to evaluate socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, outdoor exposure, and computer use and to investigate if newly introduced physical activity spaces can reduce eye growth in school-aged children. METHODS: Participants (N = 2643) from the Dutch population–based birth cohort Generation R were examined at ages 6 and 9 years. Socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence, eye growth, and lifestyle were determined using regression analyses. Information on physical activity spaces located in Rotterdam was obtained. Differences in eye growth between those who became exposed to new physical activity spaces (n = 230) and those nonexposed (n = 1866) were evaluated with individual-level fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Myopia prevalence was 2.2% at age 6 years and 12.2% at age 9 years. Outdoor exposure was 11.4 h/wk at age 6 years and 7.4 h/wk at age 9 years. Computer use was 2.1 h/wk at age 6 years and 5.2 h/wk at age 9 years. Myopia incidence was higher in children with non-Dutch background, and families with lower household income and lower maternal education (odds ratio [OR], 1.081 [95% confidence interval, 1.052 to 1.112]; OR, 1.035 [95% confidence interval, 1.008 to 1.063]; OR, 1.028 [95% confidence interval, 1.001 to 1.055], respectively). Children living <600 m of a physical activity space did not have increased outdoor exposure, except those from families with lower maternal education (β = 1.33 h/wk; 95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 2.51 h/wk). Newly introduced physical activity spaces were not associated with reduction of eye growth. CONCLUSIONS: Children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families became more often myopic than those from socioeconomically advantaged families. We did not find evidence that physical activity spaces protect against myopia for the population at large, but subgroups may benefit. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8677612/ /pubmed/34759237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001809 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigations Enthoven, Clair A. Mölenberg, Famke J. M. Tideman, J. Willem L. Polling, Jan Roelof Labrecque, Jeremy A. Raat, Hein van Lenthe, Frank J. Klaver, Caroline C. W. Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title | Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title_full | Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title_fullStr | Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title_short | Physical Activity Spaces Not Effective against Socioeconomic Inequalities in Myopia Incidence: The Generation R Study |
title_sort | physical activity spaces not effective against socioeconomic inequalities in myopia incidence: the generation r study |
topic | Original Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT enthovenclaira physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT molenbergfamkejm physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT tidemanjwilleml physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT pollingjanroelof physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT labrecquejeremya physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT raathein physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT vanlenthefrankj physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy AT klavercarolinecw physicalactivityspacesnoteffectiveagainstsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmyopiaincidencethegenerationrstudy |