Cargando…
Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: Resection margin status is considered one of the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal pancreatectomy (DP). Thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6 |
_version_ | 1784616179715801088 |
---|---|
author | Sahakyan, Mushegh A. Verbeke, Caroline S. Tholfsen, Tore Ignjatovic, Dejan Kleive, Dyre Buanes, Trond Lassen, Kristoffer Røsok, Bård I. Labori, Knut Jørgen Edwin, Bjørn |
author_facet | Sahakyan, Mushegh A. Verbeke, Caroline S. Tholfsen, Tore Ignjatovic, Dejan Kleive, Dyre Buanes, Trond Lassen, Kristoffer Røsok, Bård I. Labori, Knut Jørgen Edwin, Bjørn |
author_sort | Sahakyan, Mushegh A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Resection margin status is considered one of the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal pancreatectomy (DP). This study aimed to investigate resection margins in DP for PDAC. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP for PDAC between October 2004 and February 2020 were included (n = 124). Resection margins and associated parameters were studied in two consecutive time periods during which different pathology examination protocols were used: non-standardized (period 1: 2004–2014) and standardized (period 2: 2015–2020). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was defined as ≤1 mm clearance. RESULTS: Laparoscopic and open resections were performed in 117 (94.4%) and 7 (5.6%) patients, respectively. The R1 rate for the entire cohort was 73.4%, increasing from 60.4% in period 1 to 83.1% in period 2 (p = 0.005). A significantly higher R1 rate was observed for the posterior margin (35.8 vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001) and anterior pancreatic surface (based on a 0 mm clearance; 18.9 vs. 35.4%, p = 0.045). Pathology examination period, poorly differentiated PDAC, and vascular invasion were associated with R1 in the multivariable model. Extended DP, positive anterior pancreatic surface, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not R1, were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Pathology examination is a key determinant of resection margin status following DP for PDAC. A high R1 rate is to be expected when pathology examination is meticulous and standardized. Involvement of the anterior pancreatic surface affects prognosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8677636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86776362022-01-04 Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma Sahakyan, Mushegh A. Verbeke, Caroline S. Tholfsen, Tore Ignjatovic, Dejan Kleive, Dyre Buanes, Trond Lassen, Kristoffer Røsok, Bård I. Labori, Knut Jørgen Edwin, Bjørn Ann Surg Oncol Pancreatic Tumors BACKGROUND: Resection margin status is considered one of the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal pancreatectomy (DP). This study aimed to investigate resection margins in DP for PDAC. METHODS: Patients who underwent DP for PDAC between October 2004 and February 2020 were included (n = 124). Resection margins and associated parameters were studied in two consecutive time periods during which different pathology examination protocols were used: non-standardized (period 1: 2004–2014) and standardized (period 2: 2015–2020). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was defined as ≤1 mm clearance. RESULTS: Laparoscopic and open resections were performed in 117 (94.4%) and 7 (5.6%) patients, respectively. The R1 rate for the entire cohort was 73.4%, increasing from 60.4% in period 1 to 83.1% in period 2 (p = 0.005). A significantly higher R1 rate was observed for the posterior margin (35.8 vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001) and anterior pancreatic surface (based on a 0 mm clearance; 18.9 vs. 35.4%, p = 0.045). Pathology examination period, poorly differentiated PDAC, and vascular invasion were associated with R1 in the multivariable model. Extended DP, positive anterior pancreatic surface, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not R1, were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Pathology examination is a key determinant of resection margin status following DP for PDAC. A high R1 rate is to be expected when pathology examination is meticulous and standardized. Involvement of the anterior pancreatic surface affects prognosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8677636/ /pubmed/34296358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Pancreatic Tumors Sahakyan, Mushegh A. Verbeke, Caroline S. Tholfsen, Tore Ignjatovic, Dejan Kleive, Dyre Buanes, Trond Lassen, Kristoffer Røsok, Bård I. Labori, Knut Jørgen Edwin, Bjørn Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | prognostic impact of resection margin status in distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Pancreatic Tumors |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34296358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sahakyanmushegha prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT verbekecarolines prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT tholfsentore prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT ignjatovicdejan prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT kleivedyre prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT buanestrond prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT lassenkristoffer prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT røsokbardi prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT laboriknutjørgen prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma AT edwinbjørn prognosticimpactofresectionmarginstatusindistalpancreatectomyforductaladenocarcinoma |