Cargando…

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease

Purpose: The Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease has recently been proposed and has been found useful for diagnosis and treatment. So far, however, there has been little in-depth evaluation of its reliability. Thus, this study aimed to assess the reproducibility and reliabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Chi, Xu, Guangyu, Zhang, Yuxuan, Cui, Zhongyi, Liu, Dayong, Yang, Yong, Wang, Xiandi, Ma, Xiaosheng, Lu, Feizhou, Jiang, Jianyuan, Wang, Hongli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.779438
_version_ 1784616223114264576
author Sun, Chi
Xu, Guangyu
Zhang, Yuxuan
Cui, Zhongyi
Liu, Dayong
Yang, Yong
Wang, Xiandi
Ma, Xiaosheng
Lu, Feizhou
Jiang, Jianyuan
Wang, Hongli
author_facet Sun, Chi
Xu, Guangyu
Zhang, Yuxuan
Cui, Zhongyi
Liu, Dayong
Yang, Yong
Wang, Xiandi
Ma, Xiaosheng
Lu, Feizhou
Jiang, Jianyuan
Wang, Hongli
author_sort Sun, Chi
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease has recently been proposed and has been found useful for diagnosis and treatment. So far, however, there has been little in-depth evaluation of its reliability. Thus, this study aimed to assess the reproducibility and reliability of the system. Methods: Patients diagnosed with Hirayama disease between 2019 and 2020 were recruited. Seven spine surgeons from four different institutions, including an experienced group of three and an inexperienced group of four, were trained as observers of the Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease, and these surgeons classified the recruited patients using the system. Then, 2 months later, they repeated the classification on the same patients in a different order. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement between the results was analyzed using percentage agreement and weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the analysis. For all the observers, experienced observers, and inexperienced observers, the agreement percentages were, respectively, 78.5% (κ = 0.76), 80.0% (κ = 0.78), and 78.9% (κ = 0.77), indicating substantial interobserver reproducibility. For distinguishing typical (Types I and II) and atypical (Type III) Hirayama disease among the different groups of observers, the percentage agreement ranged from 95.6 to 98.9% (κ = 0.74–0.92), indicating substantial to nearly perfect reproducibility. For suggesting conservative treatment (Types I and III) or surgery (Type II), the percentage agreement ranged from 93.3 to 96.4% (κ = 0.81–0.90), indicating nearly perfect reproducibility. As for intraobserver agreement, the percentage agreement ranged from 68.3 to 81.7% (κ = 0.65–0.79), indicating substantial reliability. Conclusion: The Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease was easy to learn and apply in a clinical environment, showing excellent reproducibility and reliability. Therefore, it would be promising to apply and promote this system for the precise and individualized future treatment of Hirayama disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8677822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86778222021-12-18 Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease Sun, Chi Xu, Guangyu Zhang, Yuxuan Cui, Zhongyi Liu, Dayong Yang, Yong Wang, Xiandi Ma, Xiaosheng Lu, Feizhou Jiang, Jianyuan Wang, Hongli Front Neurol Neurology Purpose: The Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease has recently been proposed and has been found useful for diagnosis and treatment. So far, however, there has been little in-depth evaluation of its reliability. Thus, this study aimed to assess the reproducibility and reliability of the system. Methods: Patients diagnosed with Hirayama disease between 2019 and 2020 were recruited. Seven spine surgeons from four different institutions, including an experienced group of three and an inexperienced group of four, were trained as observers of the Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease, and these surgeons classified the recruited patients using the system. Then, 2 months later, they repeated the classification on the same patients in a different order. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement between the results was analyzed using percentage agreement and weighted kappa (κ) statistics. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the analysis. For all the observers, experienced observers, and inexperienced observers, the agreement percentages were, respectively, 78.5% (κ = 0.76), 80.0% (κ = 0.78), and 78.9% (κ = 0.77), indicating substantial interobserver reproducibility. For distinguishing typical (Types I and II) and atypical (Type III) Hirayama disease among the different groups of observers, the percentage agreement ranged from 95.6 to 98.9% (κ = 0.74–0.92), indicating substantial to nearly perfect reproducibility. For suggesting conservative treatment (Types I and III) or surgery (Type II), the percentage agreement ranged from 93.3 to 96.4% (κ = 0.81–0.90), indicating nearly perfect reproducibility. As for intraobserver agreement, the percentage agreement ranged from 68.3 to 81.7% (κ = 0.65–0.79), indicating substantial reliability. Conclusion: The Huashan clinical classification system for Hirayama disease was easy to learn and apply in a clinical environment, showing excellent reproducibility and reliability. Therefore, it would be promising to apply and promote this system for the precise and individualized future treatment of Hirayama disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8677822/ /pubmed/34925218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.779438 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sun, Xu, Zhang, Cui, Liu, Yang, Wang, Ma, Lu, Jiang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Sun, Chi
Xu, Guangyu
Zhang, Yuxuan
Cui, Zhongyi
Liu, Dayong
Yang, Yong
Wang, Xiandi
Ma, Xiaosheng
Lu, Feizhou
Jiang, Jianyuan
Wang, Hongli
Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title_full Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title_fullStr Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title_short Interobserver and Intraobserver Reproducibility and Reliability of the Huashan Clinical Classification System for Hirayama Disease
title_sort interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and reliability of the huashan clinical classification system for hirayama disease
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34925218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.779438
work_keys_str_mv AT sunchi interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT xuguangyu interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT zhangyuxuan interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT cuizhongyi interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT liudayong interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT yangyong interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT wangxiandi interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT maxiaosheng interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT lufeizhou interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT jiangjianyuan interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease
AT wanghongli interobserverandintraobserverreproducibilityandreliabilityofthehuashanclinicalclassificationsystemforhirayamadisease