Cargando…

Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in the field of gynecology. Because the majority of women with EP are hemodynamically stable, non-surgical therapy is a viable option. The goal of this study was to determine the most effective non-surgical therapy for hemo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Chao, Shi, Qingquan, Cheng, Qijun, Xu, Jianli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027851
_version_ 1784616252126265344
author Xiao, Chao
Shi, Qingquan
Cheng, Qijun
Xu, Jianli
author_facet Xiao, Chao
Shi, Qingquan
Cheng, Qijun
Xu, Jianli
author_sort Xiao, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in the field of gynecology. Because the majority of women with EP are hemodynamically stable, non-surgical therapy is a viable option. The goal of this study was to determine the most effective non-surgical therapy for hemodynamically stable EP. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane library in May 2020, with no starting date restrictions.Studies were restricted to randomized controlled trials, which were included if the target population contained women with tubal EP and the intervention was non-surgical management. The primary outcome measure was treatment success defined by a decrease in serum hCG to a level ranging from five mIU/mL to 50 mIU/mL. Secondary outcome measures were side effects, time needed to treat, number of injections and operative rate. RESULTS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 15 studies that included 1573 women who were diagnosed with EP and managed non-surgically. There was no significant difference in treatment success in the matched groups; however, single-dose MTX was associated with fewer side effects than multiple-dose (relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.28–0.80, P = .006) and two-dose therapies (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55–1.00, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: We highly recommend that single-dose MTX without mifepristone be used first-line in patients who require conservative therapy due to the inherent negative effects of mifepristone. An EP woman with a low -hCG level that is falling or plateauing should receive expectant treatment to reduce adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8677977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86779772021-12-20 Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xiao, Chao Shi, Qingquan Cheng, Qijun Xu, Jianli Medicine (Baltimore) 5600 BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in the field of gynecology. Because the majority of women with EP are hemodynamically stable, non-surgical therapy is a viable option. The goal of this study was to determine the most effective non-surgical therapy for hemodynamically stable EP. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, LILACS, SciELO, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane library in May 2020, with no starting date restrictions.Studies were restricted to randomized controlled trials, which were included if the target population contained women with tubal EP and the intervention was non-surgical management. The primary outcome measure was treatment success defined by a decrease in serum hCG to a level ranging from five mIU/mL to 50 mIU/mL. Secondary outcome measures were side effects, time needed to treat, number of injections and operative rate. RESULTS: We conducted a meta-analysis of 15 studies that included 1573 women who were diagnosed with EP and managed non-surgically. There was no significant difference in treatment success in the matched groups; however, single-dose MTX was associated with fewer side effects than multiple-dose (relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.28–0.80, P = .006) and two-dose therapies (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55–1.00, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: We highly recommend that single-dose MTX without mifepristone be used first-line in patients who require conservative therapy due to the inherent negative effects of mifepristone. An EP woman with a low -hCG level that is falling or plateauing should receive expectant treatment to reduce adverse effects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8677977/ /pubmed/34918633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027851 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5600
Xiao, Chao
Shi, Qingquan
Cheng, Qijun
Xu, Jianli
Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5600
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027851
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaochao nonsurgicalmanagementoftubalectopicpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiqingquan nonsurgicalmanagementoftubalectopicpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengqijun nonsurgicalmanagementoftubalectopicpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xujianli nonsurgicalmanagementoftubalectopicpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis