Cargando…
Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments
The spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) (White, 1845), is an invasive pest in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Understanding this pest’s dispersion patterns is fundamental for development of management and surveillance programs. To address this knowledge gap,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34555164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab104 |
_version_ | 1784616307443892224 |
---|---|
author | Calvin, D D Keller, J Rost, J Walsh, B Biddinger, D Hoover, K Treichler, B Johnson, A Roush, R T |
author_facet | Calvin, D D Keller, J Rost, J Walsh, B Biddinger, D Hoover, K Treichler, B Johnson, A Roush, R T |
author_sort | Calvin, D D |
collection | PubMed |
description | The spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) (White, 1845), is an invasive pest in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Understanding this pest’s dispersion patterns is fundamental for development of management and surveillance programs. To address this knowledge gap, we quantified spotted lanternfly nymph dispersion patterns by instar for rural and urban/suburban habitats, and we compared the number of sample units required for sticky traps and in situ visual counts to estimate population densities at several precisions. In addition, we assessed the ability of two experimental designs (completely random and randomized complete block) to detect management practices’ impacts in the field. All instars typically followed an aggregated dispersion pattern. Sample size and time requirements for checking and replacing sticky traps and for conducting in situ counts were similar, but in situ counts do not require purchasing traps, installation time, or delays before treatment, and do not remove insects. Although the cost for using in situ counts is likely less than for sticky traps, early instar spotted lanternfly nymph populations are harder to visually detect than later instars because of their small size, which may negate any cost advantage when treatments are applied early. In general, using a randomized complete block design resulted in higher statistical power than a completely random design, allowing detection of proportional population reductions of 10–20% less with equal replication. Studies aiming to evaluate treatments that reduce spotted lanternfly numbers by less than 60% will require researchers to evaluate the feasibility of using the required large sample sizes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8678449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86784492021-12-17 Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments Calvin, D D Keller, J Rost, J Walsh, B Biddinger, D Hoover, K Treichler, B Johnson, A Roush, R T Environ Entomol Population Ecology The spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) (White, 1845), is an invasive pest in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Understanding this pest’s dispersion patterns is fundamental for development of management and surveillance programs. To address this knowledge gap, we quantified spotted lanternfly nymph dispersion patterns by instar for rural and urban/suburban habitats, and we compared the number of sample units required for sticky traps and in situ visual counts to estimate population densities at several precisions. In addition, we assessed the ability of two experimental designs (completely random and randomized complete block) to detect management practices’ impacts in the field. All instars typically followed an aggregated dispersion pattern. Sample size and time requirements for checking and replacing sticky traps and for conducting in situ counts were similar, but in situ counts do not require purchasing traps, installation time, or delays before treatment, and do not remove insects. Although the cost for using in situ counts is likely less than for sticky traps, early instar spotted lanternfly nymph populations are harder to visually detect than later instars because of their small size, which may negate any cost advantage when treatments are applied early. In general, using a randomized complete block design resulted in higher statistical power than a completely random design, allowing detection of proportional population reductions of 10–20% less with equal replication. Studies aiming to evaluate treatments that reduce spotted lanternfly numbers by less than 60% will require researchers to evaluate the feasibility of using the required large sample sizes. Oxford University Press 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8678449/ /pubmed/34555164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab104 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Population Ecology Calvin, D D Keller, J Rost, J Walsh, B Biddinger, D Hoover, K Treichler, B Johnson, A Roush, R T Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title | Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title_full | Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title_fullStr | Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title_short | Spotted Lanternfly (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) Nymphal Dispersion Patterns and Their Influence on Field Experiments |
title_sort | spotted lanternfly (hemiptera: fulgoridae) nymphal dispersion patterns and their influence on field experiments |
topic | Population Ecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34555164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvab104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT calvindd spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT kellerj spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT rostj spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT walshb spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT biddingerd spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT hooverk spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT treichlerb spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT johnsona spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments AT roushrt spottedlanternflyhemipterafulgoridaenymphaldispersionpatternsandtheirinfluenceonfieldexperiments |