Cargando…
Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children?
Background: Twinkle artifact, also known as color Doppler comet-tail artifact, occurs behind very strong, granular, and irregular reflecting interfaces such as crystals, stones, or calcification. This is visualized as a random mixture of red and blue pixels in the high-frequency shift spectrum locat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Exeley Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970438 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0048 |
_version_ | 1784616349465575424 |
---|---|
author | AlSaiady, Moath Alqatie, Ahmad Almushayqih, Musab |
author_facet | AlSaiady, Moath Alqatie, Ahmad Almushayqih, Musab |
author_sort | AlSaiady, Moath |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Twinkle artifact, also known as color Doppler comet-tail artifact, occurs behind very strong, granular, and irregular reflecting interfaces such as crystals, stones, or calcification. This is visualized as a random mixture of red and blue pixels in the high-frequency shift spectrum located deep to the interface. Study results have suggested that the sonographic twinkling artifact may aid in the detection of renal stones with a variety of reference standard imaging modalities, including abdominal radiography, excretory urography, gray-scale sonography, and CT. Material and methods: Our retrospective observational study included children who had undergone abdomen/renal ultrasound for kidneys stones in our radiology department between 2013 and 2019. Presence of the twinkle artifact, and stone numbers and sizes were documented. CT examinations done <3 months prior to or after US were retrospectively assessed to confirm the presence of kidney stones as a reference standard. Results: Thirty-three abdominal renal US scans of 33 patients (21 males, 12 females) fulfilled the entry criteria. The interval between the US and CT was <3 months for all patients. The median overall age of the patients was 4 years (IQR: 3.125, range: 1– 165 months), The median number of days between the US and CT was 13 (IQR: 26, range: 0–81 days). US detected 33 hyperechoic foci suspected to be stones; 26 were confirmed as true positive (i.e. showed the twinkle artifact and were seen in CT), 4 were false positive (showed the twinkle artifact but were not seen in CT), and 3 were false negative (did not show the twinkle artifact but were seen in CT). The overall median stone size was 2 mm in the right kidney, and 5 mm in the left kidney (IQR: 6,11 mm), respectively. Twinkle artifact sensitivity was found to be 89.7% (95% CI 39.574%–90%). The twinkle artifact was assessed in all true-positive stones, determining a relatively high PPV of 26/29 (86.7%) for the twinkle artifact. The twinkle artifact was not dependent on stone size. Specificity for the twinkle artifact could not be calculated due to a lack of true negatives. Conclusion: The twinkle artifact is a sensitive US tool for detecting pediatric kidney and ureter stones, but with a small risk of false positive findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8678643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Exeley Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86786432021-12-29 Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? AlSaiady, Moath Alqatie, Ahmad Almushayqih, Musab J Ultrason Medicine Background: Twinkle artifact, also known as color Doppler comet-tail artifact, occurs behind very strong, granular, and irregular reflecting interfaces such as crystals, stones, or calcification. This is visualized as a random mixture of red and blue pixels in the high-frequency shift spectrum located deep to the interface. Study results have suggested that the sonographic twinkling artifact may aid in the detection of renal stones with a variety of reference standard imaging modalities, including abdominal radiography, excretory urography, gray-scale sonography, and CT. Material and methods: Our retrospective observational study included children who had undergone abdomen/renal ultrasound for kidneys stones in our radiology department between 2013 and 2019. Presence of the twinkle artifact, and stone numbers and sizes were documented. CT examinations done <3 months prior to or after US were retrospectively assessed to confirm the presence of kidney stones as a reference standard. Results: Thirty-three abdominal renal US scans of 33 patients (21 males, 12 females) fulfilled the entry criteria. The interval between the US and CT was <3 months for all patients. The median overall age of the patients was 4 years (IQR: 3.125, range: 1– 165 months), The median number of days between the US and CT was 13 (IQR: 26, range: 0–81 days). US detected 33 hyperechoic foci suspected to be stones; 26 were confirmed as true positive (i.e. showed the twinkle artifact and were seen in CT), 4 were false positive (showed the twinkle artifact but were not seen in CT), and 3 were false negative (did not show the twinkle artifact but were seen in CT). The overall median stone size was 2 mm in the right kidney, and 5 mm in the left kidney (IQR: 6,11 mm), respectively. Twinkle artifact sensitivity was found to be 89.7% (95% CI 39.574%–90%). The twinkle artifact was assessed in all true-positive stones, determining a relatively high PPV of 26/29 (86.7%) for the twinkle artifact. The twinkle artifact was not dependent on stone size. Specificity for the twinkle artifact could not be calculated due to a lack of true negatives. Conclusion: The twinkle artifact is a sensitive US tool for detecting pediatric kidney and ureter stones, but with a small risk of false positive findings. Exeley Inc. 2021-11-29 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8678643/ /pubmed/34970438 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0048 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Medicine AlSaiady, Moath Alqatie, Ahmad Almushayqih, Musab Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title | Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title_full | Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title_fullStr | Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title_full_unstemmed | Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title_short | Twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
title_sort | twinkle artifact in renal ultrasound, is it a solid point for the diagnosis of renal stone in children? |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970438 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2021.0048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsaiadymoath twinkleartifactinrenalultrasoundisitasolidpointforthediagnosisofrenalstoneinchildren AT alqatieahmad twinkleartifactinrenalultrasoundisitasolidpointforthediagnosisofrenalstoneinchildren AT almushayqihmusab twinkleartifactinrenalultrasoundisitasolidpointforthediagnosisofrenalstoneinchildren |