Cargando…
Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial
Although continuous erythropoietin receptor activators (CERAs) are widely used erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for correcting renal anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), few reports have examined weekly CERA administration. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14171 |
_version_ | 1784616366423146496 |
---|---|
author | Kawai, Yuki Toya, Yoshiyuki Wakui, Hiromichi Fujikawa, Tetsuya Ueda, Eiko Azushima, Kengo Mitsuhashi, Hiroshi Kawano, Tomoyuki Kuji, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ohnishi, Toshimasa Tamura, Kouichi |
author_facet | Kawai, Yuki Toya, Yoshiyuki Wakui, Hiromichi Fujikawa, Tetsuya Ueda, Eiko Azushima, Kengo Mitsuhashi, Hiroshi Kawano, Tomoyuki Kuji, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ohnishi, Toshimasa Tamura, Kouichi |
author_sort | Kawai, Yuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although continuous erythropoietin receptor activators (CERAs) are widely used erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for correcting renal anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), few reports have examined weekly CERA administration. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and changes in the parameters of iron metabolism and erythropoiesis between weekly and biweekly CERA administration. In total, 120 patients undergoing maintenance HD were randomized to the weekly or biweekly group. The primary end point was the total CERA dose needed to maintain the target hemoglobin (Hb) levels during a 12‐week evaluation period. There was no significant difference in the total dose between the weekly and biweekly groups (median 175.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 93.8–337.5] µg/12 weeks vs. 300.0 [IQR 125.0–375.0] µg/12 weeks, P = .18). The mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were 10.9 ± 0.8 g/dL in the weekly group and 10.7 ± 0.8 g/dL in the biweekly group (P = .25). Weekly CERA administration was well tolerated. Weekly CERA administration similarly managed anemia as biweekly administration in patients undergoing HD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8678717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86787172021-12-23 Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial Kawai, Yuki Toya, Yoshiyuki Wakui, Hiromichi Fujikawa, Tetsuya Ueda, Eiko Azushima, Kengo Mitsuhashi, Hiroshi Kawano, Tomoyuki Kuji, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ohnishi, Toshimasa Tamura, Kouichi J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Erythropoietin Although continuous erythropoietin receptor activators (CERAs) are widely used erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents for correcting renal anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), few reports have examined weekly CERA administration. In this randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and changes in the parameters of iron metabolism and erythropoiesis between weekly and biweekly CERA administration. In total, 120 patients undergoing maintenance HD were randomized to the weekly or biweekly group. The primary end point was the total CERA dose needed to maintain the target hemoglobin (Hb) levels during a 12‐week evaluation period. There was no significant difference in the total dose between the weekly and biweekly groups (median 175.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 93.8–337.5] µg/12 weeks vs. 300.0 [IQR 125.0–375.0] µg/12 weeks, P = .18). The mean Hb levels during the evaluation period were 10.9 ± 0.8 g/dL in the weekly group and 10.7 ± 0.8 g/dL in the biweekly group (P = .25). Weekly CERA administration was well tolerated. Weekly CERA administration similarly managed anemia as biweekly administration in patients undergoing HD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8678717/ /pubmed/33481341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14171 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Erythropoietin Kawai, Yuki Toya, Yoshiyuki Wakui, Hiromichi Fujikawa, Tetsuya Ueda, Eiko Azushima, Kengo Mitsuhashi, Hiroshi Kawano, Tomoyuki Kuji, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Satoshi Ohnishi, Toshimasa Tamura, Kouichi Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous CERA administration on erythropoiesis: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of the effects of weekly and biweekly intravenous cera administration on erythropoiesis: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Erythropoietin |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8678717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33481341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jch.14171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kawaiyuki comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT toyayoshiyuki comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wakuihiromichi comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fujikawatetsuya comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT uedaeiko comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT azushimakengo comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mitsuhashihiroshi comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kawanotomoyuki comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kujitadashi comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamaguchisatoshi comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ohnishitoshimasa comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tamurakouichi comparisonoftheeffectsofweeklyandbiweeklyintravenousceraadministrationonerythropoiesisarandomizedcontrolledtrial |