Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male

This study investigated and compared the surgical outcomes of using endoscopic enucleation (thulium: YAG laser and bipolar plasma; ThuLEP) with robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) in the treatment of prostates larger than 80 cm(3). Records were obtained for the period from January 2014 to D...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Chen-Pang, Lin, Yu-Hsiang, Yang, Pei-Shan, Chang, Phei-Lang, Chen, Chien-lun, Lin, Kuo-Yen, Juang, Horng-Heng, Weng, Shu-Chuan, Tsui, Ke-Hung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15579883211064128
_version_ 1784616430713438208
author Hou, Chen-Pang
Lin, Yu-Hsiang
Yang, Pei-Shan
Chang, Phei-Lang
Chen, Chien-lun
Lin, Kuo-Yen
Juang, Horng-Heng
Weng, Shu-Chuan
Tsui, Ke-Hung
author_facet Hou, Chen-Pang
Lin, Yu-Hsiang
Yang, Pei-Shan
Chang, Phei-Lang
Chen, Chien-lun
Lin, Kuo-Yen
Juang, Horng-Heng
Weng, Shu-Chuan
Tsui, Ke-Hung
author_sort Hou, Chen-Pang
collection PubMed
description This study investigated and compared the surgical outcomes of using endoscopic enucleation (thulium: YAG laser and bipolar plasma; ThuLEP) with robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) in the treatment of prostates larger than 80 cm(3). Records were obtained for the period from January 2014 to December 2020 for selected patients with BPO who underwent RASP, ThuLEP, or bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP). Patients were excluded if they had active malignant disease, neurogenic bladder, lower urinary tract syndrome for reasons other than BPO, and a history of prostate surgery. Data of 396 patients who underwent B-TUEP, ThuLEP, and RASP were examined. A total of 112 patients met the including criteria, 85 of whom (B-TUEP: 29; ThuLEP: 41; RASP: 15) completed the final visit. The mean operation time and duration of postoperative hospital stays in the RASP group were significantly longer than those of the B-TUEP and ThuLEP groups. Only 1 patient in the RASP group required blood transfusion. The RASP group was superior to the other groups in voiding improvement including Qmax and IPSS voiding score. The pain score of the ThuLEP group after surgery was significantly lower than that of the other two groups during hospitalization, whereas the QoL scores were identical between the three groups at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post operation. The rates of returning to ER within the first postoperative month did not differ significantly between the three groups, and all the reasons for return involved minor complications that required no additional invasive treatment. These three surgical methods (B-TUEP, ThuLEP, and RASP) are all effective and safe for treating prostates larger than 80 cm3, with each having its particular advantages. B-TUEP requires the shortest operation time, ThuLEP causes the lowest postoperative pain, and RASP results in superior voiding function improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8679036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86790362021-12-18 Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male Hou, Chen-Pang Lin, Yu-Hsiang Yang, Pei-Shan Chang, Phei-Lang Chen, Chien-lun Lin, Kuo-Yen Juang, Horng-Heng Weng, Shu-Chuan Tsui, Ke-Hung Am J Mens Health Original Article This study investigated and compared the surgical outcomes of using endoscopic enucleation (thulium: YAG laser and bipolar plasma; ThuLEP) with robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) in the treatment of prostates larger than 80 cm(3). Records were obtained for the period from January 2014 to December 2020 for selected patients with BPO who underwent RASP, ThuLEP, or bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP). Patients were excluded if they had active malignant disease, neurogenic bladder, lower urinary tract syndrome for reasons other than BPO, and a history of prostate surgery. Data of 396 patients who underwent B-TUEP, ThuLEP, and RASP were examined. A total of 112 patients met the including criteria, 85 of whom (B-TUEP: 29; ThuLEP: 41; RASP: 15) completed the final visit. The mean operation time and duration of postoperative hospital stays in the RASP group were significantly longer than those of the B-TUEP and ThuLEP groups. Only 1 patient in the RASP group required blood transfusion. The RASP group was superior to the other groups in voiding improvement including Qmax and IPSS voiding score. The pain score of the ThuLEP group after surgery was significantly lower than that of the other two groups during hospitalization, whereas the QoL scores were identical between the three groups at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post operation. The rates of returning to ER within the first postoperative month did not differ significantly between the three groups, and all the reasons for return involved minor complications that required no additional invasive treatment. These three surgical methods (B-TUEP, ThuLEP, and RASP) are all effective and safe for treating prostates larger than 80 cm3, with each having its particular advantages. B-TUEP requires the shortest operation time, ThuLEP causes the lowest postoperative pain, and RASP results in superior voiding function improvement. SAGE Publications 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8679036/ /pubmed/34903071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15579883211064128 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hou, Chen-Pang
Lin, Yu-Hsiang
Yang, Pei-Shan
Chang, Phei-Lang
Chen, Chien-lun
Lin, Kuo-Yen
Juang, Horng-Heng
Weng, Shu-Chuan
Tsui, Ke-Hung
Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title_full Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title_short Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Compared With Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Prostates Larger Than 80 cm(3) in Aging Male
title_sort clinical outcome of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate compared with robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy for prostates larger than 80 cm(3) in aging male
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15579883211064128
work_keys_str_mv AT houchenpang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT linyuhsiang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT yangpeishan clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT changpheilang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT chenchienlun clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT linkuoyen clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT juanghorngheng clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT wengshuchuan clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale
AT tsuikehung clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicenucleationoftheprostatecomparedwithroboticassistedsimpleprostatectomyforprostateslargerthan80cm3inagingmale