Cargando…

Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritschel, Michaela, Kuske, Silke, Gnass, Irmela, Andrich, Silke, Moschinski, Kai, Borgmann, Sandra Olivia, Herrmann-Frank, Annegret, Metzendorf, Maria-Inti, Wittgens, Charlotte, Flohé, Sascha, Sturm, Johannes, Windolf, Joachim, Icks, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050168
_version_ 1784616436102070272
author Ritschel, Michaela
Kuske, Silke
Gnass, Irmela
Andrich, Silke
Moschinski, Kai
Borgmann, Sandra Olivia
Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
Wittgens, Charlotte
Flohé, Sascha
Sturm, Johannes
Windolf, Joachim
Icks, Andrea
author_facet Ritschel, Michaela
Kuske, Silke
Gnass, Irmela
Andrich, Silke
Moschinski, Kai
Borgmann, Sandra Olivia
Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
Wittgens, Charlotte
Flohé, Sascha
Sturm, Johannes
Windolf, Joachim
Icks, Andrea
author_sort Ritschel, Michaela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies. DESIGN: Systematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18–75 years with an Injury Severity Score≥16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: The search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017060825.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8679059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86790592022-01-04 Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review Ritschel, Michaela Kuske, Silke Gnass, Irmela Andrich, Silke Moschinski, Kai Borgmann, Sandra Olivia Herrmann-Frank, Annegret Metzendorf, Maria-Inti Wittgens, Charlotte Flohé, Sascha Sturm, Johannes Windolf, Joachim Icks, Andrea BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: We (1) collected instruments that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), activities of daily living (ADL) and social participation during follow-up after polytrauma, (2) described their use and (3) investigated other relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in the studies. DESIGN: Systematic Review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, as well as the trials registers ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched from January 2005 to April 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All original empirical research published in English or German including PROs of patients aged 18–75 years with an Injury Severity Score≥16 and/or an Abbreviated Injury Scale≥3. Studies with defined injuries or diseases (e.g. low-energy injuries) and some text types (e.g. grey literature and books) were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded, but references screened for appropriate studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction, narrative content analysis and a critical appraisal (e.g. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were performed by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: The search yielded 3496 hits; 54 publications were included. Predominantly, HRQoL was assessed, with Short Form-36 Health Survey applied most frequently. ADL and (social) participation were rarely assessed. The methods most used were postal surveys and single assessments of PROs, with a follow-up period of one to one and a half years. Other relevant PRO areas reported were function, mental disorders and pain. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation in the assessment of PROs after polytrauma, impairing comparability of outcomes. First efforts to standardise the collection of PROs have been initiated, but require further harmonisation between central players. Additional knowledge on rarely reported PRO areas (e.g. (social) participation, social networks) may lead to their consideration in health services provision. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017060825. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8679059/ /pubmed/34916311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050168 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Ritschel, Michaela
Kuske, Silke
Gnass, Irmela
Andrich, Silke
Moschinski, Kai
Borgmann, Sandra Olivia
Herrmann-Frank, Annegret
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti
Wittgens, Charlotte
Flohé, Sascha
Sturm, Johannes
Windolf, Joachim
Icks, Andrea
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title_full Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title_short Assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
title_sort assessment of patient-reported outcomes after polytrauma – instruments and methods: a systematic review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34916311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050168
work_keys_str_mv AT ritschelmichaela assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT kuskesilke assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT gnassirmela assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT andrichsilke assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT moschinskikai assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT borgmannsandraolivia assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT herrmannfrankannegret assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT metzendorfmariainti assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT wittgenscharlotte assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT flohesascha assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT sturmjohannes assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT windolfjoachim assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview
AT icksandrea assessmentofpatientreportedoutcomesafterpolytraumainstrumentsandmethodsasystematicreview