Cargando…

Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results

Background: The tool “Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory” (PELI) for Nursing Homes (NH) was developed in the USA. In our project PELI-D, the PELI was translated from English into German and piloted in three care settings: Nursing Home (NH), Home Care (HC) and Adult Day Care (AD). Objective: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bergmann, Johannes, Stacke, Tobias, Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike, Purwins, Daniel, Manietta, Christina, Stroebel, Armin, Roes, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679446/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1015
_version_ 1784616523758829568
author Bergmann, Johannes
Stacke, Tobias
Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike
Purwins, Daniel
Manietta, Christina
Stroebel, Armin
Roes, Martina
author_facet Bergmann, Johannes
Stacke, Tobias
Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike
Purwins, Daniel
Manietta, Christina
Stroebel, Armin
Roes, Martina
author_sort Bergmann, Johannes
collection PubMed
description Background: The tool “Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory” (PELI) for Nursing Homes (NH) was developed in the USA. In our project PELI-D, the PELI was translated from English into German and piloted in three care settings: Nursing Home (NH), Home Care (HC) and Adult Day Care (AD). Objective: The objective is to provide insights in preferences of importance of older adults in need of care in Germany. Methods: Data collection was carried out in 2019 on multiple measurement points: n=48 baseline (T0) and n=41 two-week follow-up (T1). Results: The results indicate that the importance of certain preferences distinguishes between the care settings: In NH preferences for body care and aspects of professional care are important. Additionally, in HC the aspects of social contact and eating/drinking are perceived as important. Comparing T0 and T1, importance of the item’s daily routines, social contact and aspects of privacy seem to be reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8679446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86794462021-12-17 Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results Bergmann, Johannes Stacke, Tobias Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike Purwins, Daniel Manietta, Christina Stroebel, Armin Roes, Martina Innov Aging Abstracts Background: The tool “Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory” (PELI) for Nursing Homes (NH) was developed in the USA. In our project PELI-D, the PELI was translated from English into German and piloted in three care settings: Nursing Home (NH), Home Care (HC) and Adult Day Care (AD). Objective: The objective is to provide insights in preferences of importance of older adults in need of care in Germany. Methods: Data collection was carried out in 2019 on multiple measurement points: n=48 baseline (T0) and n=41 two-week follow-up (T1). Results: The results indicate that the importance of certain preferences distinguishes between the care settings: In NH preferences for body care and aspects of professional care are important. Additionally, in HC the aspects of social contact and eating/drinking are perceived as important. Comparing T0 and T1, importance of the item’s daily routines, social contact and aspects of privacy seem to be reliable. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8679446/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1015 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bergmann, Johannes
Stacke, Tobias
Rommerskirch-Manietta, Mike
Purwins, Daniel
Manietta, Christina
Stroebel, Armin
Roes, Martina
Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title_full Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title_fullStr Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title_full_unstemmed Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title_short Testing a Preference Tool in Different Care Settings in Germany: Descriptive Results
title_sort testing a preference tool in different care settings in germany: descriptive results
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679446/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1015
work_keys_str_mv AT bergmannjohannes testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT stacketobias testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT rommerskirchmaniettamike testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT purwinsdaniel testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT maniettachristina testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT stroebelarmin testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults
AT roesmartina testingapreferencetoolindifferentcaresettingsingermanydescriptiveresults