Cargando…

Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)

As functional health declines, dependency on others increases along with the risk of neglect and its harmful consequences. In this paper, we use data collected during 2015-16 (Round 3) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) to identify older adults at risk of neglect and to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howe, Melissa, Pierce, Grey, Zhong, Selena, Piedra, Lissette, Choi, Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679502/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1058
_version_ 1784616537076793344
author Howe, Melissa
Pierce, Grey
Zhong, Selena
Piedra, Lissette
Choi, Won
author_facet Howe, Melissa
Pierce, Grey
Zhong, Selena
Piedra, Lissette
Choi, Won
author_sort Howe, Melissa
collection PubMed
description As functional health declines, dependency on others increases along with the risk of neglect and its harmful consequences. In this paper, we use data collected during 2015-16 (Round 3) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) to identify older adults at risk of neglect and to test the hypothesis that high neglect risk predicts poorer health. Specifically, we use NSHAP’s functional health survey module and follow-up care receiving “loop” to categorize respondents as having either “high” or “low” neglect risk. NSHAP’s functional health module assesses respondents’ difficulties with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Because ADLs and IADLs are integral to the maintenance of physical health, hygiene, and well-being, the unrequited desire for help with such activities could signal neglect. Accordingly, we assign “high neglect risk” to respondents who report either that they: (a) want but are not getting help with an ADL or IADL; or (b) are getting help with an ADL or IADL, but from a helper who is not very reliable. Motivated by current research that documents higher rates of morbidity and mortality among neglected older adults, we examine associations between neglect risk and other key NSHAP measures, including indicators of physical health, mental health, cognition, social support, social strain, and field interviewer assessed respondent hygiene. Results suggest that this method of risk assessment can be useful in identifying vulnerable populations of older adults. Follow-up interviews are needed to further confirm its utility as a risk assessment tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8679502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86795022021-12-17 Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016) Howe, Melissa Pierce, Grey Zhong, Selena Piedra, Lissette Choi, Won Innov Aging Abstracts As functional health declines, dependency on others increases along with the risk of neglect and its harmful consequences. In this paper, we use data collected during 2015-16 (Round 3) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) to identify older adults at risk of neglect and to test the hypothesis that high neglect risk predicts poorer health. Specifically, we use NSHAP’s functional health survey module and follow-up care receiving “loop” to categorize respondents as having either “high” or “low” neglect risk. NSHAP’s functional health module assesses respondents’ difficulties with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Because ADLs and IADLs are integral to the maintenance of physical health, hygiene, and well-being, the unrequited desire for help with such activities could signal neglect. Accordingly, we assign “high neglect risk” to respondents who report either that they: (a) want but are not getting help with an ADL or IADL; or (b) are getting help with an ADL or IADL, but from a helper who is not very reliable. Motivated by current research that documents higher rates of morbidity and mortality among neglected older adults, we examine associations between neglect risk and other key NSHAP measures, including indicators of physical health, mental health, cognition, social support, social strain, and field interviewer assessed respondent hygiene. Results suggest that this method of risk assessment can be useful in identifying vulnerable populations of older adults. Follow-up interviews are needed to further confirm its utility as a risk assessment tool. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8679502/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1058 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Howe, Melissa
Pierce, Grey
Zhong, Selena
Piedra, Lissette
Choi, Won
Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title_full Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title_fullStr Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title_short Evaluating Risk of Neglect Among Older Adults Using NSHAP Round 3 (2015-2016)
title_sort evaluating risk of neglect among older adults using nshap round 3 (2015-2016)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679502/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1058
work_keys_str_mv AT howemelissa evaluatingriskofneglectamongolderadultsusingnshapround320152016
AT piercegrey evaluatingriskofneglectamongolderadultsusingnshapround320152016
AT zhongselena evaluatingriskofneglectamongolderadultsusingnshapround320152016
AT piedralissette evaluatingriskofneglectamongolderadultsusingnshapround320152016
AT choiwon evaluatingriskofneglectamongolderadultsusingnshapround320152016