Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults
BACKGROUND: Self-report screening instruments are frequently used as scalable methods to detect common mental disorders (CMDs), but their validity across cultural and linguistic groups is unclear. We summarized the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires on symptoms of depression, anxiety and po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.39 |
_version_ | 1784616612440047616 |
---|---|
author | de Graaff, Anne M. Cuijpers, Pim Leeflang, Mariska Sferra, Irene Uppendahl, Jana R. de Vries, Ralph Sijbrandij, Marit |
author_facet | de Graaff, Anne M. Cuijpers, Pim Leeflang, Mariska Sferra, Irene Uppendahl, Jana R. de Vries, Ralph Sijbrandij, Marit |
author_sort | de Graaff, Anne M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-report screening instruments are frequently used as scalable methods to detect common mental disorders (CMDs), but their validity across cultural and linguistic groups is unclear. We summarized the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires on symptoms of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Arabic-speaking adults. METHODS: Five databases were searched from inception to 22 January 2021 (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645). Studies were included when diagnostic accuracy of brief (maximally 25 items) psychological questionnaires was assessed in Arabic-speaking populations and the reference standard was a clinical interview. Data on sensitivity/specificity, area under the curve, and data to generate 2 × 2 tables at various thresholds were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using the diagmeta package in R. Quality of studies was assessed with QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (N(participants) = 4042) reporting on 17 questionnaires with 5–25 items targeting depression/anxiety (n = 14), general distress (n = 2), and PTSD (n = 1) were included. Seventeen studies (53%) scored high risk on at least two QUADAS-2 domains. The meta-analysis identified an optimal threshold of 11 (sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%) for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (n(studies) = 7, n(participants) = 711), 7 (sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%) for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale and 6 (sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%) for the depression subscale (n(studies) = 4, n(participants) = 492), and 8 (sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%) for the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) (n(studies) = 4, n(participants) = 459). CONCLUSION: We present optimal thresholds to screen for perinatal depression with the EPDS, anxiety/depression with the HADS, and CMDs with the SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8679833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86798332021-12-28 A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults de Graaff, Anne M. Cuijpers, Pim Leeflang, Mariska Sferra, Irene Uppendahl, Jana R. de Vries, Ralph Sijbrandij, Marit Glob Ment Health (Camb) Review BACKGROUND: Self-report screening instruments are frequently used as scalable methods to detect common mental disorders (CMDs), but their validity across cultural and linguistic groups is unclear. We summarized the diagnostic accuracy of brief questionnaires on symptoms of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Arabic-speaking adults. METHODS: Five databases were searched from inception to 22 January 2021 (PROSPERO: CRD42018070645). Studies were included when diagnostic accuracy of brief (maximally 25 items) psychological questionnaires was assessed in Arabic-speaking populations and the reference standard was a clinical interview. Data on sensitivity/specificity, area under the curve, and data to generate 2 × 2 tables at various thresholds were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using the diagmeta package in R. Quality of studies was assessed with QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (N(participants) = 4042) reporting on 17 questionnaires with 5–25 items targeting depression/anxiety (n = 14), general distress (n = 2), and PTSD (n = 1) were included. Seventeen studies (53%) scored high risk on at least two QUADAS-2 domains. The meta-analysis identified an optimal threshold of 11 (sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 85.1%) for the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (n(studies) = 7, n(participants) = 711), 7 (sensitivity 81.9%, specificity 87.6%) for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety subscale and 6 (sensitivity 73.0%, specificity 88.6%) for the depression subscale (n(studies) = 4, n(participants) = 492), and 8 (sensitivity 86.0%, specificity 83.9%) for the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) (n(studies) = 4, n(participants) = 459). CONCLUSION: We present optimal thresholds to screen for perinatal depression with the EPDS, anxiety/depression with the HADS, and CMDs with the SRQ-20. More research on Arabic-language questionnaires, especially those targeting PTSD, is needed. Cambridge University Press 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8679833/ /pubmed/34966543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.39 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review de Graaff, Anne M. Cuijpers, Pim Leeflang, Mariska Sferra, Irene Uppendahl, Jana R. de Vries, Ralph Sijbrandij, Marit A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in Arabic-speaking adults |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies of self-report screening instruments for common mental disorders in arabic-speaking adults |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degraaffannem asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT cuijperspim asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT leeflangmariska asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sferrairene asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT uppendahljanar asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT devriesralph asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sijbrandijmarit asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT degraaffannem systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT cuijperspim systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT leeflangmariska systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sferrairene systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT uppendahljanar systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT devriesralph systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults AT sijbrandijmarit systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracystudiesofselfreportscreeninginstrumentsforcommonmentaldisordersinarabicspeakingadults |