Cargando…

Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status

Informal caregivers of aging older adults experience a high degree of burden and strain. These emotional experiences often stem from stressful tasks associated with caregiving. Caregiving supportive services that target the provision of support for stressful tasks are instrumental in alleviating car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Travers, Jasmine, Fabius, Chanee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679970/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1529
_version_ 1784616644984700928
author Travers, Jasmine
Fabius, Chanee
author_facet Travers, Jasmine
Fabius, Chanee
author_sort Travers, Jasmine
collection PubMed
description Informal caregivers of aging older adults experience a high degree of burden and strain. These emotional experiences often stem from stressful tasks associated with caregiving. Caregiving supportive services that target the provision of support for stressful tasks are instrumental in alleviating caregiving burden and strain. Research is limited on what types of caregiving supportive services caregivers are accessing by relationship status and their source of information. We sought to characterize caregiving supportive services use by caregiving relationship status. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Study of Caregiving limited to caregivers of older adults □65 years. Caregiver relationship status (i.e., spouse, child, other relative/non-relative) was the independent variable. Bivariate analyses were performed to examine the association with caregiver relationship status and 1) any use of supportive services, 2) type of supportive service used among users, and 3) source of information about supportive services. Our sample consisted of 1,871 informal caregivers, 30.7% reported using supportive services. By caregiver relationship status, children had the greatest use of supportive services compared to spouses and other relatives/non-relatives (33.3% vs. 22.5% vs. 22.1%, p=.02, respectively). Among users of services, there were no differences in type of services used. Spouses primarily received their information about services from a medical provider or social worker (73.8%, p=.004). Our findings highlight the need to ensure that other caregiving groups such as spouses have access to important supportive services such as financial support. Medical providers and/or social workers should be better leveraged and equipped to provide this information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8679970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86799702021-12-17 Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status Travers, Jasmine Fabius, Chanee Innov Aging Abstracts Informal caregivers of aging older adults experience a high degree of burden and strain. These emotional experiences often stem from stressful tasks associated with caregiving. Caregiving supportive services that target the provision of support for stressful tasks are instrumental in alleviating caregiving burden and strain. Research is limited on what types of caregiving supportive services caregivers are accessing by relationship status and their source of information. We sought to characterize caregiving supportive services use by caregiving relationship status. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2015 National Study of Caregiving limited to caregivers of older adults □65 years. Caregiver relationship status (i.e., spouse, child, other relative/non-relative) was the independent variable. Bivariate analyses were performed to examine the association with caregiver relationship status and 1) any use of supportive services, 2) type of supportive service used among users, and 3) source of information about supportive services. Our sample consisted of 1,871 informal caregivers, 30.7% reported using supportive services. By caregiver relationship status, children had the greatest use of supportive services compared to spouses and other relatives/non-relatives (33.3% vs. 22.5% vs. 22.1%, p=.02, respectively). Among users of services, there were no differences in type of services used. Spouses primarily received their information about services from a medical provider or social worker (73.8%, p=.004). Our findings highlight the need to ensure that other caregiving groups such as spouses have access to important supportive services such as financial support. Medical providers and/or social workers should be better leveraged and equipped to provide this information. Oxford University Press 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8679970/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1529 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Travers, Jasmine
Fabius, Chanee
Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title_full Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title_fullStr Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title_short Characterizing Supportive Services Use by Caregiving Relationship Status
title_sort characterizing supportive services use by caregiving relationship status
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8679970/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.1529
work_keys_str_mv AT traversjasmine characterizingsupportiveservicesusebycaregivingrelationshipstatus
AT fabiuschanee characterizingsupportiveservicesusebycaregivingrelationshipstatus