Cargando…
Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive
In 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the ban on assisted suicide unconstitutional and invalid. The court derived a right to self-determined dying from the general right of personality. This right also includes the freedom to take one’s own life and to seek help from third parties for t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-021-03469-9 |
_version_ | 1784616664197758976 |
---|---|
author | Henking, Tanja |
author_facet | Henking, Tanja |
author_sort | Henking, Tanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the ban on assisted suicide unconstitutional and invalid. The court derived a right to self-determined dying from the general right of personality. This right also includes the freedom to take one’s own life and to seek help from third parties for this purpose and to make use of help if it is offered. In the meantime, there are several proposals for regulations and draft laws that pursue different concepts of a possible future regulation of assisted suicide. However, from the perspective of criminal law, the search for a new regulation should always be preceded by the question of the necessity of a new regulation. A new regulation must not be limited to certain groups of persons, such as persons with incurable, terminal illnesses, because otherwise the suicide motive would be assessed. This brings with it the particular challenge of finding a regulation that covers the different problem and need situations without assessing the suicide motive and also takes into account that the autonomy of the individual can be endangered in different ways. The article takes its starting point in the right to suicide, sheds light on different concepts, and discusses their advantages and disadvantages without explicitly highlighting individual legislative proposals. This is intended to enrich the further debate with individual aspects. At the same time, it advocates legislative restraint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8680052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86800522021-12-17 Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive Henking, Tanja Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Leitthema In 2020, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the ban on assisted suicide unconstitutional and invalid. The court derived a right to self-determined dying from the general right of personality. This right also includes the freedom to take one’s own life and to seek help from third parties for this purpose and to make use of help if it is offered. In the meantime, there are several proposals for regulations and draft laws that pursue different concepts of a possible future regulation of assisted suicide. However, from the perspective of criminal law, the search for a new regulation should always be preceded by the question of the necessity of a new regulation. A new regulation must not be limited to certain groups of persons, such as persons with incurable, terminal illnesses, because otherwise the suicide motive would be assessed. This brings with it the particular challenge of finding a regulation that covers the different problem and need situations without assessing the suicide motive and also takes into account that the autonomy of the individual can be endangered in different ways. The article takes its starting point in the right to suicide, sheds light on different concepts, and discusses their advantages and disadvantages without explicitly highlighting individual legislative proposals. This is intended to enrich the further debate with individual aspects. At the same time, it advocates legislative restraint. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8680052/ /pubmed/34919151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-021-03469-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Leitthema Henking, Tanja Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title | Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title_full | Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title_fullStr | Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title_full_unstemmed | Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title_short | Suizid und Suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer Perspektive |
title_sort | suizid und suizidbeihilfe aus rechtlicher und ethischer perspektive |
topic | Leitthema |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8680052/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34919151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-021-03469-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henkingtanja suizidundsuizidbeihilfeausrechtlicherundethischerperspektive |